Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Urolithiasis — Diagnostik und Therapie

Steinreich — bei dieser Erkrankung nicht unbedingt erstrebenswert

  • FORTBILDUNG_ÜBERSICHT
  • Published:
MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Harnsteine werden immer häufiger. Ursachen hierfür sind einerseits Veränderungen der Lebensgewohnheiten und des Ernährungsverhaltens und andererseits die Verbesserung der medizinischen Grundversorgung. Was im Verdachtsfall zu tun ist und wie Ihre Patienten Rezidive verhindern können, lesen Sie auf den folgenden Seiten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abbildung 3

Literatur

  1. Hesse A et al. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 2003;44(6):709–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Türk C, Petric A, Sarica K, Straub M, Seitz C. Guidelines on Urolithiasis, in EAU Guidelines, edition 2011, E.A.o. Urology, Editor. 2011, EAU: Arnhem, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang JH et al. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic. J Chin Med Assoc 2008;71(1):30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yilmaz S et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 1998;8(2):212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller OF et al. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology 1998;52(6):982–987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Niall O et al. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol 1999;161(2):534–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sourtzis S et al. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(6):1491–1494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jellison FC et al. Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. J Urol 2009;182(6):2762–2767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Poletti PA et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(4):927–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stumpp P et al. Performance of an Automatic Dose Control System for CT: Patient Studies. Rofo 2012;184:345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Strittmatter F et al. Imaging for diagnostics of urolithiasis including dual-energy CT. Urologe A 2013;52(4):541–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Knoll T. S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis: Part 1: Diagnostic and therapy. Urologe A 2009;48(8): 917–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller OF, Kane CJ. Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education. J Urol 1999;162(3 Pt 1):688–690; discussion 690–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Preminger G M et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 2007;178(6):2418–2434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Türk C et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis, E.A.o.U. Guidelines, Editor. 2012, http://www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines/.

  16. Arbeitskreis „Harnsteine“ der Akademie der Deutschen Urologen, Arbeitskreis „Endourologie und Steinerkrankung“ der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft für Urologie, Knoll T. S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis: Part 1: Diagnostic and therapy. Urologe A 2009;48(8): 917–924

  17. Sivula A, Lehtonen T. Spontaneous passage of artificial concretions applied in the rabbit ureter. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1967;1(3):259–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hollingsworth JM et al. Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;368(9542):1171–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye Z et al. A multicentre, prospective, randomized trial: comparative efficacy of tamsulosin and nifedipine in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones with renal colic. BJU Int 2011;108(2):276–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Porpiglia F et al. Nifedipine versus tamsulosin for the management of lower ureteral stones. J Urol 2004;172(2):568–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Losek R L, Mauro LS. Efficacy of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for passage of renal and ureteral calculi. Ann Pharmacother 2008;42(5):692–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tugcu V et al. Does stone dimension affect the effectiveness of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in distal ureteral stones? Int Urol Nephrol 2008;40(2):269–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tiselius HG. How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones? J Endourol 2008;22(2):249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuganti PE et al. Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy: analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies. Urology 2008;72(4): 770–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elashry OM et al. Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: a 15-year single-centre experience. BJU Int 2008;102(8): 1010–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bader MJ et al. Contemporary management of ureteral stones. Eur Urol 2012;61(4):764–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aboumarzouk OM et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2012;26(10):1257–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lingeman JE et al. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 1994;151(3):663–667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Albala DM et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 2001;166(6):2072–2080.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagele U et al. Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the minimally invasive percutaneous approach. J Endourol 2008;22(9):1851–1853; discussion 1857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pearle MS et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 2008;179(5 Suppl):S69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Arbeitskreis Harnsteine der Akademie der Deutschen Urologen, Arbeitskreis Endourologie und Steinerkrankung der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft für Urolgoie. S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis. Part 2: Metabolic diagnostic and metaphylaxis]. Urologe A 2009; 48(9):1084–1093

  33. Obligado SH, Goldfarb DS, The association of nephrolithiasis with hypertension and obesity: a review. Am J Hypertens 2008;21(3): 257–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Y et al. Kidney stones and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64(3):402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Borghi L et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 2002;346(2):77–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland

    Frank Strittmatter

  2. München, Deutschland

    Christian Gratzke &  Christian G. Stief

Authors
  1. Frank Strittmatter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Gratzke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian G. Stief
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Strittmatter.

Additional information

Interessenkonflikt

Die Autoren erklären, dass sie sich bei der Erstellung des Beitrages von keinen wirtschaftlichen Interessen leiten ließen. Sie legen folgende potenzielle Interessenkonflikte offen: keine

Der Verlag erklärt, dass die inhaltliche Qualität des Beitrags von zwei unabhängigen Gutachtern geprüft wurde. Werbung in dieser Zeitschriftenausgabe hat keinen Bezug zur CME-Fortbildung. Der Verlag garantiert, dass die CME-Fortbildung sowie die CME-Fragen frei sind von werblichen Aussagen und keinerlei Produktempfehlungen enthalten. Dies gilt insbesondere für Präparate, die zur Therapie des dargestellten Krankheitsbildes geeignet sind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strittmatter, F., Gratzke, C. & Stief, C.G. Steinreich — bei dieser Erkrankung nicht unbedingt erstrebenswert. MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin 157, 44–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15006-015-2543-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15006-015-2543-2

Keywords - Urolithiasis

Search

Navigation