Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stenting hat auch langfristig keine Vorteile gegenüber der konservativen Therapie

Schlaganfallprävention bei symptomatischen intrakraniellen Stenosen

  • journal club
  • Published:
InFo Neurologie & Psychiatrie Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ et al; for the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial Investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet 2013; [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland

    Hans-Christoph Diener (Direktor)

Authors
  1. Hans-Christoph Diener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Christoph Diener.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diener, HC. Stenting hat auch langfristig keine Vorteile gegenüber der konservativen Therapie. InFo Neurologie 16, 11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15005-014-0010-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15005-014-0010-8

Search

Navigation