Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Schwerpunkt "Tumorrisikosyndrome"

Chancen von genetischer Beratung und Diagnostik

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
InFo Hämatologie + Onkologie Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Parens E, Appelbaum PS. On What We Have Learned and Still Need to Learn about the Psychosocial Impacts of Genetic Testing. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49 Suppl 1:S2-S9

  2. Sabatello M, Juengst E. Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49 Suppl 1:S10-S8.

  3. Godino L et al. Decision making and experiences of young adults undergoing presymptomatic genetic testing for familial cancer: a longitudinal grounded theory study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26(1):44-53

  4. Watson M et al. Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk? Genet Test. 2005;9(2):167-74

  5. Hirschberg AM et al. Psychiatric implications of cancer genetic testing. Cancer. 2015;121(3):341-60

  6. Godino L et al. Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing on young adults: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(4):496-503.

  7. Armstrong J et al. Utilization and Outcomes of BRCA Genetic Testing and Counseling in a National Commercially Insured Population: The ABOUT Study. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(9):1251-60

  8. Tercyak KP et al. Cancer genetic health communication in families tested for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk: a qualitative investigation of impact on children's genetic health literacy and psychosocial adjustment. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(3):493-503

  9. Aspinwall LG et al. Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcome. Psychooncology. 2013;22(2):276-89

  10. Heshka JT et al. A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genet Med. 2008;10(1):19-32

  11. Ringwald J et al. Psychological Distress, Anxiety, and Depression of Cancer-Affected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review. J Genet Couns. 2016;25(5):880-91

  12. Roberts JS. Assessing the Psychological Impact of Genetic Susceptibility Testing. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49 Suppl 1:S38-S43

  13. Wade CH. What Is the Psychosocial Impact of Providing Genetic and Genomic Health Information to Individuals? An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49 Suppl 1:S88-S96

  14. https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/psychoonkologie/abgerufen am 19. April 2021

  15. Bonadies DC, Brierley KL, Barnett RE, Baxter MD, Donenberg T, Ducaine WL, et al. Adverse events in cancer genetic testing: the third case series. Cancer J. 2014;20(4):246-53

  16. Jayaratne TE et al. The Perennial Debate: Nature, Nurture, or Choice? Black and White Americans' Explanations for Individual Differences. Rev Gen Psychol. 2009;13(1):24-33

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AG Genetische Beratung, Institut für Humangenetik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland

    Johanna Tecklenburg

Authors
  1. Johanna Tecklenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tecklenburg, J. Chancen von genetischer Beratung und Diagnostik. InFo Hämatol Onkol 24, 23–25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15004-021-8664-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15004-021-8664-0

Search

Navigation