Schulterendoprothesen werden bereits seit den 1980er-Jahren erfolgreich eingebaut. Nach einer rasanten Entwicklung dieser künstlichen Schultergelenke in den letzten zehn Jahren stehen mittlerweile unzählige verschiedene Typen zur individuellen Versorgung zur Verfügung. Dieser Beitrag stellt die Unterschiede der immer häufiger eingesetzten inversen Schulterendoprothesen heraus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Seebauer L et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of defect arthropathy. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2005;17(1):1–24
Boileau P et al. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14(1):147–61
Grammont PM et al. Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 1993;16(1):65–8
Zumstein MA et al. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:146–57
Ladermann A et al. Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position an range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int. Orthop 2015;39:2205–13
Ladermann A. et al. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2018;42:1339–46
Virani NA et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty components and surgical techniques that restore glenohumeral motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:179–87
Frankle M et al. The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1697–705
Cuff D et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1996–2000
Churchill JL et al. Current controversies in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2016;4(6) https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00070
Boileau P et al. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder anthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:2133–42
Athwal GS et al. Does bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty decrease scapular notching?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:468–73
Ballas R et al. Results of a stemless reverse shoulder prosthesis at more than 58 months mean without loosening. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22(9):1–6
Berth A et al. Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis: a comparison of the functional outcome after a minimum of two years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol 2012;14(1):31–7
Huguet D et al. Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis; radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:847–52
Kadum B et al. Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study. Int Orthop 2014;38(5):1001–6
von Engelhardt LV et al. Short-term results of the reverse Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS) in cuff tear arthropathy and revision arthroplasty cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015;135(7):897–904
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jerosch, J., von Engelhardt, L.V.B. Große Vielfalt an inversen Schulterendoprothesen. Orthop. Rheuma 22, 26–32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15002-019-1671-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15002-019-1671-y