Skip to main content
Log in

Intra-Articular Atelocollagen Injection for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects in Rabbit Model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Background:

Atelocollagen is widely recognized as a biomaterial for regenerative medicine because of its good compatibility and low antigenicity. Injury of the outermost layer of articular cartilage, known as the lamina splendens, can lead to osteoarthritis (OA) and eventually full-thickness cartilage loss. The intra-articular injection of atelocollagen has been designed to restore the cartilage layer and cartilage defects in OA joints. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of atelocollagen as a cartilage supplement for joint defects.

Methods:

In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of atelocollagen in animals with cartilage defects. Femoral groove defects were artificially created in 12 male New Zealand white rabbits, which were treated with intra-articular injection of either atelocollagen (experimental) or normal saline (control). The results were observed 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks following macroscopic and histological evaluations.

Results:

At 3 weeks, cartilage tissue was restored in the experimental group, whereas the control group did not show signs of restoration. At 12 weeks, defects in both groups were filled with regenerated tissue, but the experimental group displayed a morphologically better appearance. Histologically, the regenerated tissue in the experimental group showed statistically significant improvement compared to the control group, with a structure similar to that of normal articular cartilage.

Conclusion:

The results showed that the intra-articular injection of atelocollagen enhanced cartilage regeneration following rabbit patellar groove defects. Therefore, intra-articular injection of atelocollagen can be used as an effective supplement for joint defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glowacki J, Mizuno S. Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biopolymers. 2008;89:338–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornwell KG, Landsman A, James KS. Extracellular matrix biomaterials for soft tissue repair. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009;26:507–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Owen RJ, Nation PN, Polakowski R, Biliske JA, Tiege PB, Griffith IJ. A preclinical study of the safety and efficacy of occlusin 500 artificial embolization device in sheep. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:636–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes LC, Archer CW, ap Gwynn I. The ultrastructure of mouse articular cartilage: collagen orientation and implications for tissue functionality. A polarised light and scanning electron microscope Studt and review. Eur Cell Mater. 2005;9:68–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Poole CA, Flint MH, Beaumont BW. Morphological and functional interrelationships of articular cartilage matrices. J Anat. 1984;138:113–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. 2009;1:461–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujioka R, Aoyama T, Takakuwa T. The layered structure of the articular surface. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1092–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Teshima R, Otsuka T, Takasu N, Yamagata N, Yamamoto K. Structure of the most superficial layer of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:460-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wardale RJ, Duance VC. Quantification and immunolocalisation of porcine articular and growth plate cartilage collagens. J Cell Sci. 1993;105:975–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffery AK, Blunn GW, Archer CW, Bentley G. Three-dimensional collagen architecture in bovine articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:795–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Polacek M. The secretome of cartilage, chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors: implications for cell transplantation strategies. 2011. https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/3010/thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

  12. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, Osteoarthritis: new insights Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:635–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:487–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maldonado M, Nam J. The role of changes in extracellular matrix of cartilage in the presence of inflammation on the pathology of osteoarthritis. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:284873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu JP, Kirk TB, Zheng MH. Study of the collagen structure in the superficial zone and physiological state of articular cartilage using a 3D confocal imaging technique. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chevalier X. Intra-articular treatments for osteoarthritis: new perspectives. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11:546–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang CT, Lin J, Chang CJ, Lin YT, Hou SM. Therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid on osteoarthritis of the kneeA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:538-45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alford JW, Cole BJ. Cartilage restoration, Part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abe T, Yamada H, Nakajima H, Kikuchi T, Takaishi H, Tadakuma T, et al. Repair of full-thickness cartilage defects using liposomal transforming growth factor-β1. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8:92-101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hurtig M, Chubinskaya S, Dickey J, Rueger D. BMP-7 protects against progression of cartilage degeneration after impact injury. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:602-11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Driscoll SW, Keeley FW, Salter RB. Durability of regenerated articular cartilage produced by free autogenous periosteal grafts in major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion A follow-up report at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Driscoll SW, Keeley FW, Salter RB. The chondrogenic potential of free autogenous periosteal grafts for biological resurfacing of major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion an experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1017–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pineda S, Pollack A, Stevenson S, Goldberg V, Caplan A. A semiquantitative scale for histologic grading of articular cartilage repair. Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;143:335–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rutgers M, van Pelt MJ, Dhert WJ, Creemers LB, Saris DB. Evaluation of histological scoring systems for tissue-engineered, repaired and osteoarthritic cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:12–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wakitani S, Goto T, Pineda SJ, Young RG, Mansour JM, Caplan AI, et al. 1994 Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:579–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buckwalter JA. Sports, joint injury, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:578–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunziker EB. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress a review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:432–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hay ED. Extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:205s–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamaguchi Y, Mann DM, Ruoslahti E. Negative regulation of transforming growth factor-β by the proteoglycan decorin. Nature. 1990;346:281–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Sam Suh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the ethics committee [Sewon Cellontech Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)] for animal experimentation and followed all institutional guidelines for the care and treatment of experimental animals (IACUC No. SC-IACUC-12–005).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suh, D.S., Yoo, J.C., Woo, S.H. et al. Intra-Articular Atelocollagen Injection for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects in Rabbit Model. Tissue Eng Regen Med 18, 663–670 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-021-00337-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-021-00337-0

Keywords

Navigation