Advertisement

Full Thickness Skin Expansion ex vivo in a Newly Developed Reactor and Evaluation of Auto-Grafting Efficiency of the Expanded Skin Using Yucatan Pig Model

  • Man-Il Huh
  • Soo-Jin Yi
  • Kyung-Pil Lee
  • Hong Kyun Kim
  • Sang-Hyun An
  • Dan-Bi Kim
  • Rae-Hyung Ryu
  • Jun-Sik Kim
  • Jeong Ok Lim
Original Article

Abstract

Background:

Skin grafts are required in numerous clinical procedures, such as reconstruction after skin removal and correction of contracture or scarring after severe skin loss caused by burns, accidents, and trauma. The current standard for skin defect replacement procedures is the use of autologous skin grafts. However, donor-site tissue availability remains a major obstacle for the successful replacement of skin defects and often limits this option. The aim of this study is to effectively expand full thickness skin to clinically useful size using an automated skin reactor and evaluate auto grafting efficiency of the expanded skin using Yucatan female pigs.

Methods:

We developed an automated bioreactor system with the functions of real-time monitoring and remote-control, optimization of grip, and induction of skin porosity for effective tissue expansion. We evaluated the morphological, ultra-structural, and mechanical properties of the expanded skin before and after expansion using histology, immunohistochemistry, and tensile testing. We further carried out in vivo grafting study using Yucatan pigs to investigate the feasibility of this method in clinical application.

Results:

The results showed an average expansion rate of 180%. The histological findings indicated that external expansion stimulated cellular activity in the isolated skin and resulted in successful grafting to the transplanted site. Specifically, hyperplasia did not appear at the auto-grafted site, and grafted skin appeared similar to normal skin. Furthermore, mechanical stimuli resulted in an increase in COL1A2 expression in a suitable environment.

Conclusions:

These findings provided insight on the potential of this expansion system in promoting dermal extracellular matrix synthesis in vitro. Conclusively, this newly developed smart skin bioreactor enabled effective skin expansion ex vivo and successful grafting in vivo in a pig model.

Keywords

Animal model Skin transplantation Tissue expansion devices Skin bioreactor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by 2017 Medical Cluster R&D Support Project through Daegu Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Republic of Korea (HI16C2505), and ETRI R&D Program [15ZC3110, Local-based medical device/robot development and medical IT convergence for small and medium enterprises revitalization project].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethical statement

Animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at DGMIF (DGMIF-16100301-01, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu, Korea).

References

  1. 1.
    Cubo N, Garcia M, Del Cañizo JF, Velasco D, Jorcano JL. 3D bioprinting of functional human skin: production and in vivo analysis. Biofabrication. 2017;9:015006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreassi A, Bilenchi R, Biagioli M, D’Aniello C. Classification and pathophysiology of skin grafts. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23:332–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loss M, Wedler V, Künzi W, Meuli-Simmen C, Meyer VE. Artificial skin, split-thickness autograft and cultured autologous keratinocytes combined to treat a severe burn injury of 93% of TBSA. Burns. 2000;26:644–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheridan R. Closure of the excised burn wound: autografts, semipermanent skin substitutes, and permanent skin substitutes. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:643–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cai SJ, Li CW, Weihs D, Wang GJ. Control of cell proliferation by a porous chitosan scaffold with multiple releasing capabilities. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18:987–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mandal BB, Kundu SC. Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2956–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sadeghi-Avalshahr A, Nokhasteh S, Molavi AM, Khorsand-Ghayeni M, Mahdavi-Shahri M. Synthesis and characterization of collagen/PLGA biodegradable skin scaffold fibers. Regen Biomater. 2017;4:309–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vig K, Chaudhari A, Tripathi S, Dixit S, Sahu R, Pillai S, et al. Advances in skin regeneration using tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:E789.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Law JX, Liau LL, Saim A, Yang Y, Idrus R. Electrospun collagen nanofibers and their applications in skin tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14:699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park TH, Choi WY, Lee JH, Lee WJ. Micronized cross-linked human acellular dermal matrices: an effective scaffold for collagen synthesis and promising material for tissue augmentation. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14:517–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spence RJ. Clinical use of a tissue expander–enhanced transposition flap for face and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;21:58–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ladd MR, Lee SJ, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Bioreactor maintained living skin matrix. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:861–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huh MI, An SH, Kim HG, Song YJ, Choi EC, An SH, et al. Rapid expansion and auto-grafting efficiency of porcine full skin expanded by a skin bioreactor ex vivo. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vidmar J, Chingwaru C, Chingwaru W. Mammalian cell models to advance our understanding of wound healing: a review. J Surg Res. 2017;210:269–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89:219–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bullough WS, Laurence EB. The control of epidermal mitotic activity in the mouse. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1960;151:517–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lorber M, Milobsky SA. Stretching of the skin in vivo. A method of influencing cell division and migration in the rat epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1968;51:395–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mackenzie IC. The effects of frictional stimulation on mouse ear epidermis. II. Histologic appearance and cell counts. J Invest Dermatol. 1974;63:194–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Curtis AS, Seehar GM. The control of cell division by tension or diffusion. Nature. 1978;274:52–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vandenburgh HH. Mechanical forces and their second messengers in stimulating cell growth in vitro. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:R350–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lancerotto L, Orgill DP. Mechanoregulation of angiogenesis in wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014;3:626–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ingber DE. Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1397–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pietramaggiori G, Liu P, Scherer SS, Kaipainen A, Prsa MJ, Mayer H, et al. Tensile forces stimulate vascular remodeling and epidermal cell proliferation in living skin. Ann Surg. 2007;246:896–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jeong C, Chung HY, Lim HJ, Lee JW, Choi KY, Yang JD, et al. Applicability and safety of in vitro skin expansion using a skin bioreactor: a clinical trial. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41:661–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xue M, Jackson CJ. Extracellular Matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4:119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ghaffari A, Kilani RT, Ghahary A. Keratinocyte-conditioned media regulate collagen expression in dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:340–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Callaghan TM, Wilhelm KP. A review of ageing and an examination of clinical methods in the assessment of ageing skin. Part I: cellular and molecular perspectives of skin ageing. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008;30:313–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uehara E, Hokazono H, Hida M, Sasaki T, Yoshioka H, Matsuo N. GABA promotes elastin synthesis and elastin fiber formation in normal human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2017;81:1198–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mithieux SM, Weiss AS. Design of an elastin-layered dermal regeneration template. Acta Biomater. 2017;52:33–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kielty CM, Sherratt MJ, Shuttleworth CA. Elastic fibres. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:2817–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Man-Il Huh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Soo-Jin Yi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kyung-Pil Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hong Kyun Kim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sang-Hyun An
    • 3
  • Dan-Bi Kim
    • 3
  • Rae-Hyung Ryu
    • 3
  • Jun-Sik Kim
    • 3
  • Jeong Ok Lim
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Research Institute, Joint Institute for Regenerative Medicine, School of MedicineKyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University HospitalDaeguRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.School of MedicineKyungpook National UniversityDaeguRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation FoundationDaeguRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations