Advertisement

Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 393–402 | Cite as

Thermoresponsive and Biodegradable Amphiphilic Block Copolymers with Pendant Functional Groups

  • Bo Keun Lee
  • Jung Hyun Noh
  • Ji Hoon Park
  • Seung Hun Park
  • Jae Ho Kim
  • Se Heang Oh
  • Moon Suk Kim
Original Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To develop the biodegradability and thermoresponsive hydrogel, in this work we designed a pendant-functionalized, thermoresponsive, amphiphilic block copolymer.

METHODS:

Methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (MPEG)-b-[poly(ε-caprolactone)-ran-poly(ε-caprolactone-3-one)-ran-polylactic acid] (MCL) and (MPEG-b-[PCL-ran-POD-ran-PLA]) [MCL-(CO)] block copolymers were prepared by ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone, OD and lactide monomers. The subsequent derivatization of MCL-(CO) provided MPEG-b-[PCL-ran-poly(ε-caprolactone-3-COOH)-ran-PLA] [MCL-(COOH)] with COOH pendant groups and MPEG-b-[PCL-ran-poly(ε-caprolactone-3-NH2)-ran-PLA] [MCL-(NH2)] with NH2 pendant groups.

RESULTS:

The measured segment ratios of MCL-(CO), MCL-(COOH), and MCL-(NH2) agreed well with the target ratios. The abundances of the COOH and NH2 groups in the MCL-(COOH) and MCL-(NH2) copolymers were determined by 1H- and 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and agreed well with the target abundances. MCL-(CO), MCL-(COOH), and MCL-(NH2) formed homogeneous, white, opaque emulsions at room temperature. Rheological analysis of the block copolymer suspensions indicated a solution-to-hydrogel phase transition as a function of temperature. The solution-to-hydrogel phase transitions and the biodegradation of MCL-(CO), MCL-(COOH), and MCL-(NH2) were affected by varying the type (ketone, COOH, or NH2) and abundance of the pendant groups.

CONCLUSION:

MCL-(CO), MCL-(COOH), and MCL-(NH2) with ketone, COOH, and NH2 pendant groups showed solution-to-hydrogel phase transitions and biodegradation behaviors that depended on both the type and number of pendant groups.

Keywords

Thermoresponsive Amphiphilic block copolymers Pendant group Solution-to-hydrogel phase transitions Biodegradation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from a Basic Science Research Program (2016R1A2B3007448) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Ethical statement

There are no animal experiments carried out for this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Basu A, Kunduru KR, Doppalapudi S, Domb AJ, Khan W. Poly(lactic acid) based hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:192–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim DY, Kwon DY, Kwon JS, Kim JH, Min BH, Kim MS. Stimuli-responsive injectable in situ-forming hydrogels for regenerative medicines. Polym Rev. 2015;55:407–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramin MA, Latxague L, Sindhu KR, Chassande O, Barthélémy P. Low molecular weight hydrogels derived from urea based-bolaamphiphiles as new injectable biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2017;145:72–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang M, Li H, Ke W, Li J, Zhao C, Ge Z. Finely tuned thermo-responsive block copolymer micelles for photothermal effect-triggered efficient cellular internalization. Macromol Biosci. 2016;16:1265–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou T, Li X, Li G, Tian T, Lin S, Shi S, et al. Injectable and thermosensitive TGF-β1-loaded PCEC hydrogel system for in vivo cartilage repair. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10553.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Song WY, Liu GM, Li J, Luo YG. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 sustained delivery by hydrogels with microspheres repairs rabbit mandibular defects. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:750–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rijal G, Li W. 3D scaffolds in breast cancer research. Biomaterials. 2016;81:135–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shimojo AAM, Galdames SEM, Perez AGM, Ito TH, Luzo ACM, Santana MHA. In vitro performance of injectable chitosan-tripolyphosphate scaffolds combined with platelet-rich plasma. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsieh FY, Tao L, Wei Y, Hsu SH. A novel biodegradable self-healing hydrogel to induce blood capillary formation. NPG Asia Mater. 2017;9:e363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim SK, Cho TH, Han JJ, Kim IS, Park Y, Hwang SJ. Comparative study of BMP-2 alone and combined with VEGF carried by hydrogel for maxillary alveolar bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kang YM, Lee SH, Lee JY, Son JS, Kim BS, Lee B, et al. A biodegradable, injectable, gel system based on MPEG-b-(PCL-ran-PLLA) diblock copolymers with an adjustable therapeutic window. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2453–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jang JY, Park SH, Park JH, Lee BK, Yun JH, Lee B, et al. In vivo osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells embedded in an injectable in vivo-forming hydrogel. Macromol Biosci. 2016;16:1158–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwon JS, Kim SW, Kwon DY, Park SH, Son AR, Kim JH, et al. In vivo osteogenic differentiation of human turbinate mesenchymal stem cells in an injectable in situ-forming hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2014;35:5337–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim JI, Kim DY, Kwon DY, Kang HJ, Kim JH, Min BH, et al. An injectable biodegradable temperature-responsive gel with an adjustable persistence window. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2823–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shim SW, Kwon DY, Park JH, Kim JH, Chun HJ, Koh YJ, et al. Preparation of zwitterionic sulfobetaine end-functionalized poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(caprolactone) diblock copolymers and examination of their thermogelling properties. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2014;52:2185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee BK, Park JH, Park SH, Kim JH, Oh SH, Lee SJ, et al. Preparation of pendant group-functionalized diblock copolymers with adjustable thermogelling behavior. Polymers. 2017;9:239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park SH, Kwon JS, Lee BS, Park JH, Lee BK, Yun JH, et al. BMP2-immobilized injectable hydrogel for osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee HY, Park SH, Kim JH, Kim MS. Temperature-responsive hydrogels via electrostatic interaction of amphiphilic diblock copolymers with pendant-ion groups. Polym Chem. 2017;8:6606–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park JH, Park SH, Lee HY, Lee JW, Lee BK, Lee BY, et al. An injectable, electrostatically interacting drug depot for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Biomaterials. 2018;154:86–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Timbart L, Amsden BG. Functionalizable biodegradable photocrosslinked elastomers based on 2-oxepane-1,5-dione. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2008;46:8191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Science and TechnologyAjou UniversityYeongtong-gu, SuwonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Nanobiomedical ScienceDankook UniversityCheonan-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations