The extracellular matrix (ECM) is known to provide instructive cues for cell attachment, proliferation, differentiation, and ultimately tissue regeneration. The use of decellularized ECM scaffolds for regenerative-medicine approaches is rapidly expanding. In this study, cartilage acellular matrix (CAM)-based bioink was developed to fabricate functional biomolecule-containing scaffolds. The CAM provides an adequate cartilage tissue–favorable environment for chondrogenic differentiation of cells. Conventional manufacturing techniques such as salt leaching, solvent casting, gas forming, and freeze drying when applied to CAM-based scaffolds cannot precisely control the scaffold geometry for mimicking tissue shape. As an alternative to the scaffold fabrication methods, 3D printing was recently introduced in the field of tissue engineering. 3D printing may better control the internal microstructure and external appearance because of the computer-assisted construction process. Hence, applications of the 3D printing technology to tissue engineering are rapidly proliferating. Therefore, printable ECM-based bioink should be developed for 3D structure stratification. The aim of this study was to develop printable natural CAM bioink for 3D printing of a tissue of irregular shape. Silk fibroin was chosen to support the printing of the CAM powder because it can be physically cross-linked and its viscosity can be easily controlled. The newly developed CAM-silk bioink was evaluated regarding printability, cell viability, and tissue differentiation. Moreover, we successfully demonstrated 3D printing of a cartilage-shaped scaffold using only this CAM-silk bioink. Future studies should assess the efficacy of in vivo implantation of 3D-printed cartilage-shaped scaffolds.
Extracellular matrix bioink Cartilage matrix Silk fibroin 3D printing Trochlea
This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI14C2143 and HI14C0744).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
This research protocol was approved by the IACUC of Ajou University (IACUC no.2013-0045).
Bolland F, Korossis S, Wilshaw SP, Ingham E, Fisher J, Kearney JN, et al. Development and characterisation of a full-thickness acellular porcine bladder matrix for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1061–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Benders KE, van Weeren PR, Badylak SF, Saris DB, Dhert WJ, Malda J. Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:169–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Yang Q, Peng J, Guo Q, Huang J, Zhang L, Yao J, et al. A cartilage ECM-derived 3-D porous acellular matrix scaffold for in vivo cartilage tissue engineering with PKH26-labeled chondrogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2378–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Park JH, Jang J, Lee JS, Cho DW. Three-dimensional printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:612–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn SH, Lee J, Park SA, Kim WD. Three-dimensional bio-printing equipment technologies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:663–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park SH, Jung CS, Min BH. Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting for hard tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;6:622–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltola SM, Melchels FP, Grijpma DW, Kellomäki M. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med. 2008;40:268–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Shivalkar S, Singh S. Solid freeform techniques application in bone tissue engineering for scaffold fabrication. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14:187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim JH, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ. Three-dimensional cell-based bioprinting for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;6:647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobral JM, Caridade SG, Sousa RA, Mano JF, Reis RL. Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:1009–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, Won Kim S, Rhie JW, Shim JH, et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3935.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Combellack EJ, Jessop ZM, Naderi N, Griffin M, Dobbs T, Ibrahim A, et al. Adipose regeneration and implications for breast reconstruction: update and the future. Gland Surg. 2016;5:227–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Liu W, Li Z, Zheng L, Zhang X, Liu P, Yang T, et al. Electrospun fibrous silk fibroin/poly(L-lactic acid) scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13:516–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu B, Kurland NE, Bano S, Patra C, Engel FB, Yadavalli VK, et al. Silk proteins for biomedical applications: bioengineering perspectives. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39:251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floren M, Migliaresi C, Motta A. Processing techniques and applications of silk hydrogels in bioengineering. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7:E26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Park SH, Gil ES, Cho H, Mandal BB, Tien LW, Min BH, et al. Intervertebral disk tissue engineering using biphasic silk composite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:447–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Trachtenberg JE, Placone JK, Smith BT, Fisher JP, Mikos AG. Extrusion-based 3D printing of poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds with hydroxyapatite gradients. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2017;28:532–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Tallawi M, Rosellini E, Barbani N, Cascone MG, Rai R, Saint-Pierre G, et al. Strategies for the chemical and biological functionalization of scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: a review. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12:20150254.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Xia Y, Zhou P, Cheng X, Xie Y, Liang C, Li C, et al. Selective laser sintering fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:4197–213.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar