Skip to main content

Comparison study of porous calcium phosphate blocks prepared by piston and screw type extruders for bone scaffold

Abstract

Piston and screw type extruders were used to prepare calcium phosphate blocks comprising macro-pores interconnected with micro-pores for bone substitutes and scaffolds. First, dicalcium phosphate dehydrate (DCPD, CaHPO4·2H2O), calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (CN, Ca(NO3)2·4H2O), hydroxyapatite (HAp, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2), and polymer (poly-methyl methactrylate PMMA, (C5O2H8)n) beads were mixed with lubricants and a plasticizer to make a paste using a table mixer. The paste prepared for the screw extruder was thicker than that prepared for the piston extruder. The pastes were kneaded more than three times and then extruded. The extruded rods were dried at 100°C for 24hrs and sintered at 1250°C for 5hrs in the air. The porosity increased with increasing amount of DCPD and CN in both systems. The porosity of the piston extruded rod was higher than that of the screw extruder rod for the same raw material composition, except for the pure HAp porous bodies. In contrast to the porosity, the compressive strength was decreased upon the addition of DCPD and CN. The screw extruded specimens showed higher compressive strength than piston extruded ones. The macro-pores generated from the PMMA polymer beads were interconnected by micro-pores generated by the reaction of DCPD and CN, which existed in the strut. The SEM images clearly showed that the piston extruder generated more micro-pores than the screw extruder. The reaction of DCPD and CN affects the porosity, compressive strength and pore structure of the porous blocks. Also, the extruding method affects the pore characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. R Langer, JP Vacanti, Tissue engineering, Science, 260, 920 (1993).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. LL Hench, JM Polak, Third-generation biomedical materials, Science, 295, 1014 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. NO Engin, AC Tas, Manufacture of macroporous calcium hydroxyapatite bioceramics, J E Ceram Soc, 19, 2569 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. IR Gibson, W Bonfield, Novel synthesis and characterization of an AB-type carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite, J BiomedMater Res, 59, 697 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. KF Leong, CM Cheah, CK Chua, Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs, Biomaterials, 24, 2363 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. AA Ignatius, CS, D Kaspar, et al., In vitro biocompatibility of resorbable experimental glass ceramics for bone substitutes, J Biomed Mater Res, 55, 285 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M Uo, M Mizuno, Y Kuboki, et al., Properties and cytotoxicity of water soluble Na2O-CaO-P2O5 glasses, Biomaterials, 19, 2277 (1998).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J Li, H Liao, X Wang, et al., Fractal perimeters of polishinginduced pull-outs polished cross sections of plasma-sprayed yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings, J Am Ceram. Soc, 86, 1906 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. NO Engin, AC Tas, Preparation of porous Ca10(P04)δ(OH)2 and Ca3(P04)2 biocera.mics, J Am Ceram Soc, 83, 1581 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. HX Peng, Z Fan, JRG Evans, et al., Microstructure of ceramic forms, J Eur Ceram Soc, 20, 807 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. SV Dorozhkin, “Bioceramics based on calcium orthophosphates (review)”, Biomaterials for medicine, 64, 442 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukyoung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

lim, S., Chun, S., Yang, D. et al. Comparison study of porous calcium phosphate blocks prepared by piston and screw type extruders for bone scaffold. Tissue Eng Regen Med 9, 51–55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-012-0051-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-012-0051-3

Key words

  • porous ceramics
  • extrusion
  • bone substitute
  • hydroxyapatite
  • PMMA