Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models for some biologically active catechol structures using PC-LS-SVM and PC-ANFIS

  • Article
  • Published:
Applied Biological Chemistry Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring predictive QSAR models for dopamine catechol structures could be used in designing more potent ligands. In this study, efforts were taken to find out the most important molecular features responsible for the biological activity of catechol structures. All 2D descriptors of Dragon including constitutional, topological, molecular walk counts, BCUT descriptors, Galvez topological, 2D autocorrelations, functional groups, atom-centred fragments, empirical descriptors and properties were calculated for the structures. Two non-linear modelling methods (PC-LS-SVM and PC-ANFIS) were used and compared in this QSAR study. The results revealed the more predictive ability of PC-LS-SVM in the QSAR analysis of the compounds with catechol substructure. The roles of topological properties and number of hydrogen bond donors group as molecular features responsible for the activity of the compounds were discussed. The obtained QSAR models can be used in future studies of drug development for human dopamine D2 receptor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afiuni-Zadeh S, Azimi G (2010) A QSAR study for modeling of 8-azaadenine analogues proposed as A1 adenosine receptor antagonists using genetic algorithm coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) Analytical sciences: the international journal of the Japan Society for. Anal Chem 26:897–902

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ankishan H, Yilmaz D (2013) Comparison of SVM and ANFIS for snore related sounds classification by using the largest Lyapunov exponent and entropy. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:238937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabin RM, Lomakina EI (2011) Support vector machine regression (LS-SVM)–an alternative to artificial neural networks (ANNs) for the analysis of quantum chemistry data? Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:11710–11718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bento AP, Gaulton A, Hersey A, Bellis LJ, Chambers J, Davies M, Kruger FA, Light Y, Mak L, McGlinchey S, Nowotka M, Papadatos G, Santos R, Overington JP (2014) The ChEMBL bioactivity database: an update. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D1083–D1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buyukbingol E, Sisman A, Akyildiz M, Alparslan FN, Adejare A (2007) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS): a new approach to predictive modeling in QSAR applications: a study of neuro-fuzzy modeling of PCP-based NMDA receptor antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem 15:4265–4282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chirico N, Gramatica P (2012) Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection. J Chem Inf Model 52:2044–2058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dastorani MT, Moghadamnia A, Piri J, Rico-Ramirez M (2010) Application of ANN and ANFIS models for reconstructing missing flow data. Environ Monit Assess 166:421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzirasa K, Ribeiro S, Costa R, Santos LM, Lin SC, Grosmark A, Sotnikova TD, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG, Nicolelis MA (2006) Dopaminergic control of sleep-wake states. J Neurosci 26:10577–10589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi MH, Dorostkar F (2010) QSAR prediction of D2 receptor antagonistic activity of 6-methoxy benzamides. Eur J Med Chem 45:4856–4862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flisikowski K, Schwarzenbacher H, Wysocki M, Weigend S, Preisinger R, Kjaer JB, Fries R (2009) Variation in neighbouring genes of the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems affects feather pecking behaviour of laying hens. Anim Genet 40:192–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulton A, Bellis LJ, Bento AP, Chambers J, Davies M, Hersey A, Light Y, McGlinchey S, Michalovich D, Al-Lazikani B, Overington JP (2012) ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D1100–D1107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodarzi M, Freitas MP (2010) MIA–QSAR coupled to PCA–ANFIS for the modeling of the anti-HIV reverse transcriptase activities of TIBO derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 45:1352–1358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiralj R, Ferreira M (2009) Basic validation procedures for regression models in QSAR and QSPR studies: theory and application. J Braz Chem Soc 20:770–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levey AI, Hersch SM, Rye DB, Sunahara RK, Niznik HB, Kitt CA, Price DL, Maggio R, Brann MR, Ciliax BJ (1993) Localization of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in brain with subtype-specific antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8861–8865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Wang JX, Xing ZN, Shen G (2011) Influence of improved Kennard/Stone algorithm on the calibration transfer in near-infrared spectroscopy. Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi=Guang pu 31:362–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta K, Zhang Y, Xu D, Mizuta F, D’Ovidio F, Masaki E, Emala CW (2013) The dopamine D1 receptor is expressed and facilitates relaxation in airway smooth muscle. Respir Res 14:89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendran R, Mason NS, Paris J, Himes ML, Douaihy AB, Frankle WG (2014) Decreased prefrontal cortical dopamine transmission in alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 171:881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, Morley C, Vandermeersch T, Hutchison GR (2011) Open babel: an open chemical toolbox. J Cheminform 3:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plouffe B, Tiberi M (2013) Functional analysis of human D1 and D5 dopaminergic G protein-coupled receptors: lessons from mutagenesis of a conserved serine residue in the cytosolic end of transmembrane region 6. Methods Mol Biol 964:141–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pontiki EA, Hadjipavlou-Litina DJ, Demertzis AM, Hadjidakis I, Kovala-Demertzi D (2005) Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) of substituded (S)-phenylpiperidines as preferential dopamine autoreceptor antagonists. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 20:5–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • QSAR_Tools (2011) http://teqip.jdvu.ac.in/QSAR_Tools/

  • Sakhteman A, Lahtela-Kakkonen M, Poso A (2011) Studying the catechol binding cavity in comparative models of human dopamine D2 receptor. J Mol Graph Model 29:685–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spuhler IA, Hauri A (2013) Decoding the dopamine signal in macaque prefrontal cortex: a simulation study using the Cx3Dp simulator. PloS One 8:e71615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno M, Taniguchi T (2004) On improvement of stability conditions for continuous Mamdani-like fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet B 34:120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens JA, Vandewalle J, De Moor B (2001) Optimal control by least squares support vector machines. Neural Netw 14:23–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tetko IV, Sushko I, Pandey AK, Zhu H, Tropsha A, Papa E, Oberg T, Todeschini R, Fourches D, Varnek A (2008) Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection. J Chem Inf Model 48:1733–1746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley RB, Bye CR, Parish CL, Tziotis-Vais A, George S, Culvenor JG, Li QX, Masters CL, Finkelstein DI, Horne MK (2009) Dopamine D2 receptor knockout mice develop features of Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 66:472–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeagle PL, Albert AD (2007) G-protein coupled receptor structure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768:808–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Chai T, Wang H (2011) A nonlinear control method based on ANFIS and multiple models for a class of SISO nonlinear systems and its application. IEEE Trans Neural Netwo 22:1783–1795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was a report of research project (1579) performed at Shahid Sadoughi university of Medical Sciences,Yazd, Iran. The authors would like to aknowledge council of research at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for support. The authors would like to thank Nazanin Bagherzadeh for her kind contribution in language editing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhossein Sakhteman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoshneviszadeh, M., Sakhteman, A. Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models for some biologically active catechol structures using PC-LS-SVM and PC-ANFIS. Appl Biol Chem 59, 433–441 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-016-0180-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-016-0180-9

Keywords

Navigation