Skip to main content
Log in

Development of nanoparticulate formulation of coenzyme Q10 and comparison of plasma coenzyme Q10 response in a single supplementation with regular coenzyme Q10 using rats

  • Original Article
  • Food Science/Microbiology
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioavailability of a nanoparticulate formulation of coenzyme Q10 (NQ20), which has high stability in the water phase, was evaluated. The particle size was 188 nm, and the zeta potential value was between −38.8 and −44.8 mV at 4, 25, and 40°C in distilled water after eight weeks storage. Bioavailability of NQ20 was compared with a commercial coenzyme Q10 in oil and water phases as emulsified form using male Sprague-Dawley rats. After single oral administration of each coenzyme Q10 solution, the blood of rats was collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 12 h, and the concentrations of coenzyme Q10 were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography. The plasma coenzyme Q10 levels at 1, 2, and 12 h were significantly higher when the rats were administered NQ20 compared to coenzyme Q10 in oil. The maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for NQ20 were 1.10±0.18 and 5.92±1.11 mM·h/mL, whereas the Cmax and AUC of coenzyme Q10 in oil were 0.79±0.07 and 5.30±0.62 mM·h/mL, respectively (p >0.05). Due to high absorbability and small particle size, NQ20 was found to have similar bioavailability to commercial coenzyme Q10 in the oil phase. Results indicate applicability of NQ20 in the food industry, particularly in beverages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhagavan HN and Chora RK (2006) Coenzyme Q10: Absorption, tissue uptake, metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Free Radic Res 40, 445–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bihari P, Vippola M, Schultes S, Praetner M, Khandoga AG, Reichel CA et al. (2008) Optimized dispersion of nanoparticles for biological in vitro and in vivo studies. Part Fibre Toxicol 5, 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchemal K, Briançon S, Perrier E, and Fessi H (2004) Nano-emulsion formulation using spontaneous emulsification: solvent, oil and surfactant optimisation. Int J Pharm 280, 241–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra RK, Goldman R, Sinatra ST, and Bhagavan HN (1998) Relative bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 formulations in human subjects. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 68, 109–113.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanasekaran M and Ren J (2005) The emerging role of coenzyme Q-10 in aging, neurodegeneration, cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes mellitus. Curr Neurovasc Res 2, 447–459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dollo G, Le Corre P, Guérin A, Chevanne F, Burgot JL, and Leverge R (2003) Spray-dried redispersible oil-in-water emulsion to improve oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci 19, 273–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo V, Morales ME, Ruiz MA, and Delgado AV (2005) An experimental investigation of the stability of ethylcellulose latex: correlation between zeta potential and sedimentation. Eur J Pharm Sci 26, 170–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka J, Kimura Y, Lai-Fu Z, Onoue S, and Yamada S (2008) Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic characterization of water-soluble Coenzyme Q(10) formulations. Int J Pharm 363, 112–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Illés E and Tombácz E (2006) The effect of humic acid adsorption on pHdependent surface charging and aggregation of magnetite nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 295, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang DJ, Jeong EJ, Lee HM, Kim BC, Lim SJ, and Kim CK (2006) Improvement of bioavailability and photostability of amlodipine using redispersible dry emulsion. Eur J Pharm Sci 28, 405–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi SS, Sawant SV, Shedge A, and Halpner AD (2003) Comparative bioavailability of two novel coenzyme Q10 preparations in humans. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 41, 42–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaikkonen J, Nyyssönen K, Tuomainen TP, Ristonmaa U, and Salonen JT (1999) Determinants of plasma coenzyme Q10 in humans. FEBS Lett 443, 163–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaikkonen J, Tuomainen TP, Nyyssonen K, and Salonen JT (2002) Coenzyme Q10: absorption, antioxidative properties, determinants, and plasma levels. Free Radic Res 36, 389–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khandavilli S and Panchagnula R (2007) Nanoemulsions as versatile formulations for paclitaxel delivery: peroral and dermal delivery studies in rats. J Invest Dermatol 127, 154–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kommuru TR, Gurley B, Khan MA, and Reddy IK (2001) Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) of coenzyme Q10: formulation development and bioavailability assessment. Int J Pharm 212, 233–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurowska EM, Dresser G, Deutsch L, Bassoo E, and Freeman DJ (2003) Relative bioavailability and antioxidant potential of two coenzyme q10 preparations. Ann Nutr Metab 47, 16–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mady MM and Darwish MM (2010) Effect of chitosan coating on the characteristics of DPPC liposomes J Adv Res 1, 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles M, Horn P, Miles L, Tang P, Steele P, and DeGrauw T (2002) Bioequivalence of coenzyme Q10 from over-the-counter supplements. Nutr Res 22, 919–929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanraj VJ and Chen Y (2006) Nanoparticles-a review. Trop J Pharm Res 5, 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosqueira VC, Legrand P, Pinto-Alphandary H, Puisieux F, and Barratt G (2000) Poly(D,L-lactide) nanocapsules prepared by a solvent displacement process: influence of the composition on physicochemical and structural properties. J Pharm Sci 89, 614–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura A, Yanagawa H, Fujikawa N, Akiko K, and Nobuhito S (2009) Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Coenzyme Q10: Absorption of Three Different Oral Formulations in Rats. J Health Sci 55, 540–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nukui K, Yamagishi T, Miyawaki H, Kettawan A, Okamoto T, and Sato K (2007) Comparison of uptake between PureSorb-Q40 and regular hydrophobic coenzyme Q10 in rats and humans after single oral intake. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 53, 187–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prosek M, Butinar J, Lukanc B, Fir MM, Milivojevic L, Krizman M et al. (2008) Bioavailability of water-soluble CoQ10 in beagle dogs. J Pharm Biomed Anal 47, 918–922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Purchas RW, Busboom JR, and Wilkinson BH (2006) Changes in the forms of iron and in concentrations of taurine, carnosine, coenzyme Q(10), and creatine in beef longissimus muscle with cooking and simulated stomach and duodenal digestion. Meat Sci 74, 443–449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker DK (2005) Engineering of nanoemulsions for drug delivery. Curr Drug Deliv 2, 297–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz C, Obermüller-Jevic UC, Hasselwander O, Bernhardt J, and Biesalski HK (2006) Comparison of the relative bioavailability of different coenzyme Q10 formulations with a novel solubilizate (Solu Q10). Int J Food Sci Nutr 57, 546–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiq S, Shakeel F, Talegaonkar S, Ahmad FJ, Khar RK, and Ali M (2007) Development and bioavailability assessment of ramipril nanoemulsion formulation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 66, 227–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siekmann B and Westesen K (1995) Preparation and physicochemical characterization of aqueous dispersions of coenzyme Q10 nanoparticles. Pharm Res 12, 201–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KK and Vingkar SK (2008) Formulation, antimalarial activity and biodistribution of oral lipid nanoemulsion of primaquine. Int J Pharm 347, 136–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomono Y, Hasegawa J, Seki T, Motegi K, and Morishita N (1986) Pharmacokinetic study of deuterium-labelled coenzyme Q10 in man. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 24, 536–541.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vyas TK, Shahiwala A, and Amiji MM (2008) Improved oral bioavailability and brain transport of Saquinavir upon administration in novel nanoemulsion formulations. Int J Pharm 347, 93–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ji Yeon Kim or Oran Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ok, HM., Kim, SM., Park, JW. et al. Development of nanoparticulate formulation of coenzyme Q10 and comparison of plasma coenzyme Q10 response in a single supplementation with regular coenzyme Q10 using rats. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 55, 619–623 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-012-2037-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-012-2037-1

Keywords

Navigation