Skip to main content
Log in

Barriers to green procurement of the Iranian construction industry: an interpretive structural modeling approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green procurement (GP) is an essential aspect of the Iranian construction industry, exerting a significant impact on all parts of the construction supply chain. The adoption of GP is crucial for achieving sustainability dimensions based on economic, environmental, and social factors throughout the extensive procurement process in construction projects. This study examines the barriers to the adoption of GP in the Iranian construction industry, which has yet to embrace modern technologies and recent advances in this area. First of all, through a comprehensive literature review, common obstacles to GP implementation were identified globally. A questionnaire survey was designed to classify the most crucial barriers to GP implementation in the Iranian context. The results reveal that the lack of environmental preferences among external stakeholders, unavailability of green products in the local market, and inadequate governmental incentives are the most significant barriers impeding the adaptation of GP. To investigate and rank the interrelationships among these barriers, an interpretive structural modeling method has been established. The lack of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) perspectives, high costs of green products, incompatible products, and the lack of suppliers’ competency are the five most fundamental hurdles to the adoption of GP in the Iranian construction industry. Particularly, knowledge improvement should include LCA and LCC training. Suppliers’ competency should also be enhanced to minimize the green emissions of products and maximize their compatibility, representing the main finding to improve the efficiency of the construction supply chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi L, Kannangara M, Bensebaa F (2020) Cost-effectiveness of small scale biomass supply chain and bioenergy production systems in carbon credit markets: a life cycle perspective. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 37:100627

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan K, Rahman S (2017) Green public procurement implementation challenges in Australian public healthcare sector. J Clean Prod 152:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akadiri PO (2015) Understanding barriers affecting the selection of sustainable materials in building projects. J Build Eng 4:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaimi BK, Khan M (2019) Public-sector green procurement in the United Arab Emirates: innovation capability and commitment to change. J Clean Prod 233:482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez S, Rubio A (2015) Carbon footprint in green public procurement: a case study in the services sector. J Clean Prod 93:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banihashemi S, Hosseini MR, Golizadeh H, Sankaran S (2017) Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. Int J Project Manag 35:1103–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manag J 43:717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (2012) Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: the relevance of resource-based theory. J Supply Chain Manag 48:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohari AAM, Skitmore M, Xia B, Teo M (2017) Green oriented procurement for building projects: preliminary findings from Malaysia. J Clean Prod 148:690–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohari AAM, Skitmore M, Xia B, Teo M, Khalil N (2020) Key stakeholder values in encouraging green orientation of construction procurement. J Clean Prod 270:122246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braulio-Gonzalo M, Bovea MD (2020) Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings. Environ Impact Assess Rev 81:106310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt AA, Toller S, Birgisson B (2015) Life cycle assessment for the green procurement of roads: a way forward. J Clean Prod 90:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang R-D, Soebarto V, Zhao Z-Y, Zillante G (2016) Facilitating the transition to sustainable construction: China’s policies. J Clean Prod 131:534–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chini A, Nasri E (2010) Sustainable development, engineering education and Iranian academe: strategies and related issues. Univ Coll Eng 43:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Das P, Godbole S, Maxwell DW, Moehler R (2023) Exploring the role of industry 4.0 in the building industry: a case study of emerging business models in the Australian construction ecosystem. In: creative construction e-conference 2023, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, pp. 309–318

  • de Giacomo MR, Testa F, Iraldo F, Formentini M (2019) Does green public procurement lead to life cycle costing (LCC) adoption? J Purch Supply Manag 25:100500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira RA, Lopes J, Abreu MI (2021) Insights from a project procurement strategy through an action research. Proc Comput Sci 181:1002–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmonico D, Jabbour CJC, Pereira SCF, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Renwick DWS, Thomé AMT (2018) Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resour Conserv Recycl 134:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathollahi-Fard AM, Ahmadi A, Karimi B (2021) Multi-objective optimization of home healthcare with working-time balancing and care continuity. Sustainability 13:12431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathollahi-Fard AM, Tian G, Ke H, Fu Y, Wong KY (2023) Efficient multi-objective metaheuristic algorithm for sustainable harvest planning problem. Comput Oper Res 158:106304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayaz R, Kari BM (2009) Comparison of energy conservation building codes of Iran, Turkey, Germany, China, ISO 9164 and EN 832. Appl Energy 86:1949–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan X, Zuo J, Ye K, Skitmore M, Xiong B (2015) Why sustainable construction? Why not? An owner’s perspective. Habitat Int 47:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Doberstein B (2008) Greening government procurement in developing countries: building capacity in China. J Environ Manag 88:932–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghadami N, Gheibi M, Kian Z, Faramarz MG, Naghedi R, Eftekhari M, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Dulebenets MA, Tian G (2021) Implementation of solar energy in smart cities using an integration of artificial neural network, photovoltaic system and classical Delphi methods. Sustain Cities Soc 74:103149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Kaliyan M, Kannan D, Haq AN (2014) Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 147:555–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandia JJ, Kruyen PP (2020) Assessing the implementation of sustainable public procurement using quantitative text-analysis tools: a large-scale analysis of Belgian public procurement notices. J Purch Supply Manag 26:100627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakiminejad A, Fu C, Mohammadzadeh Titkanlou H (2015) A critical review of sustainable built environment development in Iran. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-engineering sustainability, Thomas Telford Ltd, pp. 105–119

  • Karji A, Namian M, Tafazzoli M (2020) Identifying the key barriers to promote sustainable construction in the United States: a principal component analysis. Sustainability 12:5088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kota S, Mishra RP, Jasti NVK, Kale S (2021) Sustainable production system critical success factors: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Proc CIRP 98:324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause DR, Vachon S, Klassen RD (2009) Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. J Supply Chain Manag 45:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen HS, Mosgaard MA, Remmen A (2021) Circular public procurement practices in Danish municipalities. J Clean Prod 281:124962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho W, Skouloudis A, Brandli LL, Salvia AL, Avila LV, Rayman-Bacchus L (2019) Sustainability and procurement practices in higher education institutions: barriers and drivers. J Clean Prod 231:1267–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindfors A, Ammenberg J (2021) Using national environmental objectives in green public procurement: method development and application on transport procurement in Sweden. J Clean Prod 280:124821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Xue J, Yang L, Shi B (2019) Enhancing green public procurement practices in local governments: Chinese evidence based on a new research framework. J Clean Prod 211:842–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Liu Y, Yang L (2020) Uncovering the influence mechanism between top management support and green procurement: the effect of green training. J Clean Prod 251:119674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Li Z, Teng Y, Dai L (2022) A dynamic simulation study on the sustainability of prefabricated buildings. Sustain Cities Soc 77:103551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar A, Sinha SK (2019) Analyzing the barriers of green textile supply chain management in Southeast Asia using interpretive structural modeling. Sustain Prod Consum 17:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy AP, Ahn Y, Pearce AR (2012) Towards establishing diffusion barriers for innovative green building products: a survey of SIPS builders. J Green Build 7:153–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray AJ, Islam MM, Siwar C, Fien J (2014) Sustainable procurement in Malaysian organizations: practices, barriers and opportunities. J Purch Supply Manag 20:195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon RR, Ravi V (2021) Analysis of barriers of sustainable supply chain management in electronics industry: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Clean Responsib Consum 3:100026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merotto D, Weber M, Aterido R (2018) Pathways to better jobs in IDA countries: findings from jobs diagnostics. World Bank

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen O, de Boer L (2009) Green procurement in Norway; a survey of practices at the municipal and county level. J Environ Manag 91:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoosavI J, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Dulebenets MA (2022) Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: recognizing potential disruption management strategies. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 75:102983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namini SB, Shakouri M, Tahmasebi MM, Preece C (2014) Managerial sustainability assessment tool for Iran’s buildings. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-engineering sustainability, Thomas Telford Ltd, pp. 12–23

  • Neij L (2001) Methods of evaluating market transformation programmes: experience in Sweden. Energy Policy 29:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissinen A, Parikka-Alhola K, Rita H (2009) Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005. Ecol Econ 68:1838–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojo E, Mbowa C, Akinlabi ET (2014) Barriers in implementing green supply chain management in construction industry. In: International conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Citeseer

  • Oluleye BI, Chan DW, Olawumi TO, Saka AB (2023) Assessment of symmetries and asymmetries on barriers to circular economy adoption in the construction industry towards zero waste: a survey of international experts. Build Environ 228:109885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasha J, Elmi Z, Purkayastha S, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Ge YE, Lau YY, Dulebenets MA (2022) The drone scheduling problem: a systematic state-of-the-art review. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 23(9):14224–14247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss L (2007) Buying into our future: sustainability initiatives in local government procurement. Bus Strateg Environ 16:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainville A (2017) Standards in green public procurement—a framework to enhance innovation. J Clean Prod 167:1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarabi S, Han Q, Romme AGL, de Vries B, Valkenburg R, den Ouden E (2020) Uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions: an analysis of barriers using interpretive structural modeling. J Environ Manage 270:110749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider L, Wallenburg CM (2012) Implementing sustainable sourcing—does purchasing need to change? J Purch Supply Manag 18:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahsavar MM, Akrami M, Kian Z, Gheibi M, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, Behzadian K (2022) Bio-recovery of municipal plastic waste management based on an integrated decision-making framework. J Ind Eng Chem 108:215–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shang M, Li H, Wang Y-P, Qin Y-Y, Liu Y, Tan Y (2021) Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different policies of government intervention. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 47:101283

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Zhang Z, Long Z (2017a) Significant barriers to green procurement in real estate development. Resour Conserv Recycl 116:160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Zhang Z, Zhang X (2017b) Key factors affecting green procurement in real estate development: a China study. J Clean Prod 153:372–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani H, Chhetri P, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Mirzapour AL-e-Hashem S, Shahparvari S (2022) Sustainable closed-loop supply chain with energy efficiency: Lagrangian relaxation, reformulations and heuristics. Ann Oper Res 318:531–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrevik M, Wangen HF, Fet AM, de Boer L (2018) Green public procurement—a case study of an innovative building project in Norway. J Clean Prod 188:879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner E (2002) ‘Green procurement’of buildings: a study of Swedish clients’ considerations. Constr Manag Econ 20:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Xu Z, Zheng H (2023) Green transformation of the building industry and the government policy effects: policy simulation based on the DSGE model. Energy 268:126721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taghavi E, Fallahpour A, Wong KY, Hoseini SA (2021) Identifying and prioritizing the effective factors in the implementation of green supply chain management in the construction industry. Sustain Oper Comput 2:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam VW, Hao JL, Zeng S (2012) What affects implementation of green buildings? An empirical study in Hong Kong. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 16:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamtam F, Tourabi A (2021) Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain leagility during COVID-19. IFAC-PapersOnLine 54:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa F, Iraldo F, Frey M, Daddi T (2012) What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Ecol Econ 82:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uttam K, Faith-Ell C, Balfors B (2012) EIA and green procurement: opportunities for strengthening their coordination. Environ Impact Assess Rev 33:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnäs A, Balfors B, Faith-Ell C (2009) Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry. J Clean Prod 17:1214–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vejaratnam N, Mohamad ZF, Chenayah S (2020) A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement. J Public Procure 20(4):451–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal R, Sánchez-Pantoja N (2019) Method based on life cycle assessment and TOPSIS to integrate environmental award criteria into green public procurement. Sustain Cities Soc 44:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker H, Brammer S (2009) Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Manag Int J 14(2):128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams K, Dair C (2007) What is stopping sustainable building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments. Sustain Dev 15:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong JKW, San Chan JK, Wadu MJ (2016) Facilitating effective green procurement in construction projects: an empirical study of the enablers. J Clean Prod 135:859–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani M, Kabirifar K, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Mojtahedi M (2021) Production scheduling of off-site prefabricated construction components considering sequence dependent due dates. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16285-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan G, Yang Y, Tian G, Fathollahi-Fard AM (2022) Capacitated multi-objective disassembly scheduling with fuzzy processing time via a fruit fly optimization algorithm. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18883-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi SAH, Mirza FM, Hou F, Ashraf RU (2019) Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: What factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan? Socioecon Plann Sci 68:100671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L, Skitmore M (2014) A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. Int J Proj Manag 32:66–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Geng Y (2013) Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers. J Clean Prod 40:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K-H (2008) Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int J Prod Econ 111:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our appreciation to Dr. Mohammed Aljuaid from King Saud University for his invaluable assistance in revising the presentation of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Fathollahi-Fard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and all the authors have read and agreed to this submission.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: S.Rangabhashiyam

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pourvaziri, M., Mahmoudkelayeh, S., Kamranfar, S. et al. Barriers to green procurement of the Iranian construction industry: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 3599–3616 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05346-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05346-1

Keywords

Navigation