Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of Iran’s biosphere reserves based on representative criteria and proposal of new options

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Man and the Biosphere Program (MaB) was established by UNESCO in the early 1970s to resolve the conflict between humans and nature. The biogeography representative was determined by UNESCO/MaB as one of the main criteria for registering an area as a biosphere reserve (BR). Therefore, countries require selecting appropriate areas for BRs to complete the criterion of representativeness of the global biogeography protection network. This study aimed to analyze the study process of biogeography representatives at the global and national levels based on the research objectives. The results revealed the necessity of combining the map of Iran’s biogeography produced at the global level with the map of the macroecosystems of national production to identify the representative ecosystem units (REUs). The production of this map led to the identification of 112 REUs in the country. The compliance maps of BRs and REUs showed that 13 BRs of the country have covered only 23% of Iran’s REUs. The results of the studies of biogeography provenances, biological hot spots and ecoregions led to the definition of 5 quantitative indicators for screening and prioritizing the country’s REU. The description of this issue, which is very brief in the abstract, is given in the text of the article. A total of 18 REUs were specified with priority for selecting new BRs using identified indicators and Entropy Shannon VIKOR models. Based on the results, 27% of the REUs proposed can be covered by modifying existing BRs boundaries. All proposed BRs could select more than one REU. In addition, 15 REUs with about 17% of the country’s area may be covered with the registration of seven new priority BRs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. World Network of Biosphere Reserves (WNBR).

References

  • Alborzimanesh M, Imani J, Danehkar A, Robati M, Alambeigi A (2021) An analytical survey of the adaptation of biosphere reserve zoning with the zoning of protected areas in Iran. J Sus Dev Env 2(3):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Aycrigg JL, Davidson A, Svancara LK, Gergely KJ, McKerrow A, Scott JM (2013) Representation of ecological systems within the protected areas network of the continental United States. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi JM et al (2020) Anew ecosystem-based land classification of Iran for conservation goals. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8145-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi C, Capotorti G, Copiz R, Guida D, Mollo B, Smiraglia D, Zavattero L (2014) Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy. Plant Biosystems 3504:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.985756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi C, Capotorti G, AlósOrtí MM, Anzellotti I, Attorre F, Azzella MM, Caril E, Copiz R, Garfi V, Manes F, Marando F, Marchetti M, Mollo B, Zavattero L (2017) Ecosystem mapping for the implementation of the European biodiversity strategy at the national level: the case of Italy. Environ Sci Policy 78:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M, Lysenko I (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philos Trans Royal Soc Biol Sci 360(1454):443–455. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dasmann RF (1973) A system for defining and classifying natural regions for purpose of conservation. IUCN 1973:47p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasrnann RF (1972) Define the role, purpose, and conservation criteria for various protected areas llth general assembly of IUCN in Banff. Canada 1972:28p

    Google Scholar 

  • Deniz K, Frye C, Sayre R, Breyer S, Aniello P, Vaughan R, Wright D (2017) Modeling global Hammond landform regions from 250-m elevation data. Trans GIS 21(5):1040–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1975) The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol Cons 7:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E, Olson D et al (2017) An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67(6):534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djamali M, Akhani H, Khoshravesh R (2011) Application of the global bioclimatic classification to Iran: implications for understanding the modern vegetation and biogeography. Ecologia Mediterranean Année 2011(37–1):91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Shadie P, Stolton S (2013) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories IUCN publications services IUCN publications services. Best Pract Prot Area Guidel Series 21:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes TR, Rossiter D, Van Wambeke A. 1982. Guidelines for evaluating the adequacy of soil resource inventories. printing ed. SMSS Technical Monograph #4. 1982, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Department of Agronomy. 51.

  • Germany MaB-National Committee. 2007. Legal and administrative aspects of the UNESCO MaB Program in Germany

  • Goshtasb H, Bali A, Esteghamat M. 2018. Principles and Management of Biosphere Reserves, Definition, Strategies and Introduction of Biosphere Reserves in Iran. UNESCO/Persian National Committee. Publication of knowledge. 199p

  • Günter K (2013) 40 years of the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program in Austria – a success story of ecological basic research and flagship of transdisciplinary. Austrian MaB Report, Austrian Man and the Biosphere (MAB) research program

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbada D, González JH, Torres RM, Pinilla JS, Martín RH, Xqlwv J (2011) An environmental land classification of Spain. Fitosociologia 48(2):101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO/MEPC. 2005. Guideline for the Identification and design nation of particularly sensitive sea areas. Adopted on 1 December 2005. 13p

  • International coordinating council of the program on man and biosphere (MaB)- Paris 1984- MAB report series No. 58. report of Minsk.

  • IUCN. 1978. Categories Objectives and Criteria for Pas. 25p

  • IUCN. 1992. Parks for Life. report of the fourth World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas, 10–21 February 1992 Caracas. 134p

  • IUCN Secretariat. 1974. Biotic Provinces of the World. (IUCN, 1974, Occasional Paper No. 9).

  • IUCN/UNEP/WWF. 1980. World Conservation Strategy. 77p

  • Labourdette DR et al (2010) Zoning a protected area: proposal based on a multi-thematic approach and final decision. Environ Modeling Assess 15:531–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourival R, Watts M, Phillip H (2011) What is Missing in Biosphere Reserves Accountability? Braz J Nat Conserv 9(2):160–178. https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2011.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules C, Sarkar S (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margules C, Pressey RL, Williams PH (2002) Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J Biosci 27:309–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe et al (1995) Combining science and policy in conservation biology. Wildl Soc Bull 23:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Russel A, Mittermeier C, Mittermeier G, Gustav AB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton L. 2007. Collaborative land use planning: Zoning for Conservation and Development in Protected Areas. The University of Wisconsin-Madison. Land tenure center, no 4:1–16. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/22153

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, Amico D, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 11:933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips A, Kelleher G.1999.Guideline for marine protected areas. ISBN: 978-2-8317-0505-7. 2-8317-0505-3.

  • Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L et al (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salm R, Price A. 1995. Selection of Marine Protected Areas: Principles of Techniques for Managing. Edited by Susan Gubbay. Chapman Hall, London.232p

  • Saner HS, Yucesan M, Gul M (2022) A Bayesian BWM and VIKOR-based model for assessing hospital preparedness in the face of disasters. Nat Hazards 111:1603–1635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05108-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer R et al (2020) An assessment of the representation of ecosystems in global protected areas using new maps of world climate regions and world ecosystems. Global Ecol Conserv 21(2020):e00860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha UB, Shrestha S, Chaudhary P, Chaudhary RP (2010) How representative is the protected areas system of Nepal? Mt Res Dev 30(3):282–294. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-10-00019.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singers NJD, Rogers GM (2014) A classification of New Zealand’s terrestrial ecosystems. Sci Conserv 325:1–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Terborgh J (1999) Continental conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunarsih S et al (2020) Analysis of priority scale for watershed reforestation using Trapezo dal Fuzzy VIKOR method: a case study in Semarang Central Java Indonesia. Symmetry 12(4):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udvardy MDF (1975) A Classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Program Project No. 8.49p

  • UNESCO jointly UNEP. 1964. Task force on criteria and guidelines for the choice and establishment of biosphere reserves final report. http://npshistory.com/publications/mab/unesco-mab-report/22.pdf. 63p

  • UNESCO (1977) Man and his environment, an overview of UNESCO’s evolvement. UNESCO, Paris 1979:65

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1993) The biosphere conference 25 years later. UNESCO, Paris 1993:34p

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO.2020.Technical Guidelines for Biosphere Reserves (TGBR).Accesed:20.11.2020. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253591

  • UNESCO. 2022. History of biosphere reserves creation of the international biological program. https://en.unesco.org/mab/50years/history-2022

  • WCS (1980) World Conservation Strategy: living resource conservation for sustainable development / prepared by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. IUCN-UNEP-WWF, Gland, Switzerland, p 78

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas KE, Bausys R (2015) Multicriteria decision-making approach by VIKOR under interval neutrosophic set environment. Article in Econ Comput Econ Cybern Studies Res Acad Econ Studies 49(4):33–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    M. Alborzi Manesh

  2. Department of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    J. Imani Harsini & M. Robati

  3. Environment Department, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Agriculture and Natural Resources Campus, Tehran, Iran

    A. DanehKar

  4. Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, University of Tehran, Agriculture and Natural Resources Campus, Tehran, Iran

    A. Alambeigi

Authors
  1. M. Alborzi Manesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Imani Harsini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. DanehKar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Robati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Alambeigi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Imani Harsini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alborzi Manesh, M., Imani Harsini, J., DanehKar, A. et al. Analysis of Iran’s biosphere reserves based on representative criteria and proposal of new options. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 9465–9480 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04981-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04981-y

Keywords

search

Navigation