Abstract
This study aims to prioritize effective factors in training environmental concepts based on teaching models in higher education of Iran. In this descriptive-survey study, opinions of 17 education experts were studied to prioritize effective factors in training environmental concepts in higher education of Iran. Moreover, 20 education experts who were professional in teaching models were studied to determine the best teaching model for teaching environmental concepts in a purposeful way in the academic year 2020–21. The assessment tools were a pairwise comparison questionnaire for the environmental concepts of higher education and a pairwise comparison questionnaire to select the best teaching model. The data of the first questionnaire related to the environmental factors of higher education were used by DEMATEL technique (Excel software), and Fuzzy TOPSIS method was used for the second questionnaire related to teaching models. In this study, according to experts of environmental concepts in Higher education, the factors of socio-cultural commitments about the environment, professors and political decisions affecting the environment were ranked as the first to third in terms of effectiveness, respectively. The evaluation of environmental knowledge, familiarity of higher education staff with the environment, and the structure of the organization were ranked as the first to third in terms of influential factors. Individual teaching models were estimated as the best one for successful teaching according to the factors of environmental concepts in higher education, and traditional teaching models were considered as the worst one.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abun D, Racoma AP (2017) Environmental attitude and environmental behavior of catholic colleges’ employees in ilocos sur, Philippines. Texila Int J Acad Res 4(1). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28802.32966
Ansari Rad P, Safari A, Bashiri Oskooi F (2020) Needs assessment of environmental education for students of the second year of elementary school in the 16th district of Tehran. Educ Scholast Stud 9(4):109–127
Chankseliani M, McCowan T (2021) Higher education and the sustainable development goals. High Educ 81(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w
Cleveland DA, Jay JA (2021) Integrating climate and food policies in higher education: a case study of the University of California. Clim Policy 21(1):16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1787939
Firoozfar I, Faqihi A, Erfani N (2020) Formulating a model of environmental ethics based on caring thinking through critical thinking of second year high school students in Hamadan. Q J Environ Educ Sustain Dev 9(1):25–40. https://doi.org/10.30473/ee.2020.7225
Ghasemi F, Shobiri M, Larijani M, Rad ShF (2017) Presenting a fuzzy multi-criteria decision model to select environmental education methods in technical and vocational schools. J Environ Educ Sustain Dev 5(3):53–73
Joyce B, Will M, Calhoun E (2015) Teaching patterns, translated by Mohammad Reza Behrangi. Kamal Tarbiat Press, Tehran
Kaarsen N (2014) Cross-country differences in the quality of schooling. J Dev Econ 107:215–224
Mohadesi H, Feizi A, Salem Safee R (2012) Comparison of indicators of effective teaching from the perspective of faculty members and students of Oromye University of Medical Sciences, 2 Monthly of Nursing and Midwifery School. Department of Oromye, http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-634-fa.html
Mohammadi N, Babaei F, Mohammadi A, Hayat Ghaib D (2020) Investigating the status of environmental education in environmental NGOs in Iran. Environ Sci Technol Q 22(1):391–402. https://doi.org/10.22034/jest.2020.27922.3689
Mousavi N, Sharifian Thani M, Sanaye Gildouz S, Quaidamini Harouni G, Darvishi A, Qamarzad Shishvan F (2018) The effectiveness of environmental education courses on the level of environmental knowledge, attitudes and skills: students of the University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences. Environ Sci Q 17(2):139–154. https://doi.org/10.29252/envs.17.2.139
Naderi N, Norouzi, Siadat A (2016) Policy in education. Yar Mana publication, Isfahan, IRAN
Olive R, Enright E (2021) Sustainability in the Australian Health and Physical Education Curriculum: an ecofeminist analysis. Sport Educ Soc 26(4):389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1888709
Ou J, Wong IA, Prentice C, Liu MT (2020) Customer engagement and its outcomes: the cross-level effect of service environment and brand equity. J Hosp Tour Res 44(2):377–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019897360
Sari A, Firat A, Karaduman A (2016) Quality assurance issues in higher education sectors of developing countries; case of northern cyprus. Soc Behav Sci 229:326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.143
Shabani H (2007) Teaching methods and techniques. Samt, Tehran
Shabiri S, Shamsi S (2014) An analysis of the interdisciplinary curriculum of environmental education in higher education. Q J Interdiscip Stud Humanit 7(3):127–145. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2015.27.005
Shateri P, Salehi S, Mohseni R, Sharifi M (2021) Environmental NGOs and methods of attracting members’ participation (Study of Tehran NGOs with a fundamental theory approach). Appl Sociol 32(2):91–128
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Climate change indicators in the United States, 2016. Fourth edition. EPA 430-R-16-004. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators
Tiong CS, Lean QY, Ming LC, Abdullah AHB, Mahalingam SR, Arshad K, Hock LS (2021) Knowledge, perceptions of risks, attitudes and practices of environmental health among university students in northern Malaysia. Int J Health Promot Educ 59(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2019.1708776
Torkzadeh J, Mohtram M (2014) The validation of student's academic satisfaction scale. High Educ Lett 7(26):155–176
Yilmaz HH, Kesik A (2010) Administrative structure and financial issues in higher education, a proposed model for improving managerial effectiveness in higher education in Turkey. J Finance (158):126–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.143
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant fnancial or non-fnancial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rezghi Shirsavar, H., Salami, N. Prioritizing effective factors in training environmental concepts based on teaching models in higher education of Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 5945–5956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04859-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04859-z