Abstract
Sluice gates are commonly used to measure water discharge and to adjust the water level in open canals. Estimation of head loss (ΔE) and discharge coefficients (Cd) for a sluice gate is essential for the design of open canals. Depending on the downstream water level, free or submerged flow conditions may occur. Although there have been some investigations on Cd for sluice gates, a comprehensive literature review shows that there are no studies of ΔE (to the best knowledge of the authors). Knowledge of ΔE is necessary for the design of intakes and irrigation canal inverts. This study investigates ΔE and Cd using scaled experimentation. Results show that ΔE for free flow is greater than that for submerged flow conditions. Meanwhile, discharge coefficients in a free flow are greater than those under submerged flow conditions. Relative energy losses (ΔE) have a minimum value of 0.271 and a maximum value of 0.604. These high energy losses cannot be ignored in intake structures and canal-designing processes, and their impact on minor canal inverts receiving water from main canals should be considered. Application of multiple nonlinear regression (MNR) models is presented for predicting ΔE and Cd. The MNR method yields accurate predictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Q :
-
Sluice gate discharge (m3/s)
- a :
-
Sluice gate opening (m)
- b :
-
Width of gate (m)
- q :
-
Discharge per unit width of sluice gate (m2/s)
- h 0 :
-
Flow depth in upstream of the sluice gate (m)
- h 2 :
-
Tailwater or downstream water depth (m)
- g :
-
Gravitational acceleration (m/s2)
- C d :
-
Discharge coefficient of the slide gate (dimensionless)
- C c :
-
Contraction coefficient (dimensionless)
- E 0 :
-
Specific energy at the upstream of sluice gate (m)
- E 1 :
-
Specific energy at the downstream of sluice gate (m)
- ΔE :
-
Relative energy losses (dimensionless)
- V 0 :
-
Mean velocity at the upstream of sluice gate (m/s)
- V1 :
-
Mean velocity at the downstream of sluice gate (m/s)
References
Akbari M, Salmasi F, Arvanaghi H, Karbasi M, Farsadizadeh D (2019) Application of gaussian process regression model to predict discharge coefficient of gated piano key weir. Water Resour Manag 33:3929–3947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02343-3
Amaral do LGH, Righes AA, Souza Filho PDS, Dalla Costa R (2005) Automatic regulator for channel flow control on flooded rice. Agricultural Water Management, 75(3), 184-193, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.12.012
Belaud G, Cassan L, Baume JP (2009) Calculation of contraction coefficient under sluice gates and application to discharge measurement. J Hydraul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000122
Clemmens J, Strelkoff TS, Replogle JA (2003) Calibration of submerged radial gates. J Hydraul Eng 129(9):680–687. https://doi.org/10.1061/~ASCE!0733-9429~2003!129:9~680
Erdbrink CD, Krzhizhanovskaya VV, Sloot PMA (2014) Free-surface flow simulations for discharge-based operation of hydraulic structure gates. J Hydroinf 16(1):189–206. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2013.215
Ghosh MK, Dutta S, Sen D (2014) Sediment flush out from pond of river diversion barrages by gate operation. Water Resour Manage 28:5335–5356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0804-y
Habibzadeh A, Vatankhah AR, Rajaratnam N (2011) Role of energy loss on discharge characteristics of sluice gates. J Hydraul Eng 137(9):1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000406
Henry HR (1950) Discussion of diffusion of submerged jets by Albertson ML, Dai YB, Jensen RA and Rouse H. Trans. ASCE, 115, p. 687–694
Hoseini P, Vatankhah AR (2021) Stage-discharge relationship for slide gates installed in partially full pipes. Flow Meas Instrum 77:101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101838
Khalili Shayan H, Farhoudi J, Vatankhah AR (2021) Experimental and field verifications of radial gates as flow measurement structures. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.071
Li YK, He XL, Qiu LC, Chen J, Han Y (2018) Experimental investigation of discharge characteristics of float type sluice gate. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 191-012094. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/191/1/012094
Nasehi ON, Salmasi F (2012) Vertical sluice gate discharge coefficient. J Civil Eng Urban 2(3):108–114
Quang LX, Nakamura K, Hung T, Tinh NV, Matsuda S, Kadota K, Horino H, Hai PT, Komatsu H, Hasegawa K, Fukuda S, Hirata J, Oura N, Kishimoto-Mo AW, Yonemura S, Onishi T (2019) Effect of organizational paddy water management by a water user group on methane and nitrous oxide emissions and rice yield in the red river delta, vietnam. Agric Water Manag 217:179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.015
Rajaratnam N (1977) Free-flow immediately below sluice gates. J Hydraul Engg ASCE 103(HY4):345–351
Rajaratnam N, Subramanya K (1967) Flow equation for the sluice gate. J Irrig Drain Eng 93(3):167–186
Rajaratnam N, Subramanya K (1967) Flow immediately below a submerged sluice gate. J Hydraul Div 93(HY4):57–77
Ramamurthy AS, Submmanya K, Pani BS (1978) Sluice gates with high discharge coefficients. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 104(IR4):437–441
Salmasi F, Abraham J (2020) Prediction of discharge coefficients for sluice gates equipped with different geometric sills under the gate using multiple non-linear regression (MNLR). J Hydrol 597:125728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125728
Salmasi F, Abraham J (2020) Expert system for determining discharge coefficients for inclined slide gates using genetic programming. J Irrig Drain Eng 146(12):06020013–06020019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001520
Salmasi F, Abraham J (2020) Predicting seepage from unlined earthen channels using the finite element method and multi variable nonlinear regression. Agric Water Manag 234(2020):106148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106148
Salmasi F, Nouri M, Abraham J (2019) Laboratory study of the effect of sills on radial gate discharge coefficient. KSCE J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1114-y
Silva CO, Rijo M (2017) Flow rate measurements under sluice gates. J Irrig Drain Eng 143:06017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001177
Swamee PK (1992) Sluice-gate discharge equations. J Irrig Drain Eng 118(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1992)118:1(56)
Swamee PK, Pathak SK, Talib M, Ojaha CSP (2000) Discharge characteristics of skew sluice gates. J of Irrig Drain ASCE 126(5):328–334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:5(328)
Vatankhah AR, Hoseini P (2021) Discharge equation for round gates in turnout pipes: Dimensional analysis and theoretical approaches. J Irrig Drain Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001530
Yahyaee AR, Moridi A, Sarang A (2021) A new optimized model to control eutrophication in multi-purpose reservoirs. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03042-y
Acknowledgements
This paper is the outcome of a research project supported by the University of Tabriz research affairs office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salmasi, F., Abraham, J. Multiple nonlinear regression-based functional relationships of energy loss for sluice gates under free and submerged flow conditions. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 11829–11842 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04429-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04429-9