Skip to main content

Environmental impacts management of grain and sweet maize through life cycle assessment in São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Maize is the second most produced food commodity in the world. Brazil is the world’s third largest producer of maize, and the state of São Paulo is one of the major maize producers in Brazil. This study uses life cycle assessment to quantify and compare the environmental impacts to produce one ton of grain and sweet maize in the southwest of São Paulo state, from cradle-to-storage at seaport boundaries. The life cycle inventory was elaborated for the 2016–2017 harvest season. Environmental impacts were assessed using the CML 2015 impact assessment method. Three other methods were tested in sensitivity analysis. Results showed impacts of 203 kg CO2 eq. for global warming, 0.55 kg SO2 eq. for acidification, 0.53 kg PO4 eq. for eutrophication, 1197 MJ for abiotic depletion, and 962 kg DCB eq. for freshwater ecotoxicity, per ton of grain maize. A comparison of grain with sweet maize showed that the latter had lower environmental impacts if consumed at São Paulo megacity. Improvements are necessary for the systems and can be achieved by minimizing or substituting the most impactful flows (i.e., hotspots), which were fertilizers (for global warming and eutrophication), pesticides (for freshwater ecotoxicity), and transport activities (for abiotic depletion and acidification). Sensitivity analysis showed that a reduction of 20% in the transport process affected most the results. Transport activities can thus be an important opportunity to improve the environmental impacts of these systems and are also an incentive for producers to explore local market.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Availability of data and materials

The data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. Others generated data analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Funding

Authors thank for the financial support: CNPQ financial number 302722/2019-0; São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP—Grant Number 2019/03287-5); and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GG contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, visualization, and project administration; GFA contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, and supervision; MJFA contributed to methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft; LSG contributed to methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft; MTK performed validation and writing—review and editing; SND contributed to methodology, validation, and writing—review and editing; DALS contributed to methodology, validation, resources, writing—review and editing, and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Giusti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Babatunde Femi Bakare.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giusti, G., Almeida, G.F., Apresentação, M.J.F. et al. Environmental impacts management of grain and sweet maize through life cycle assessment in São Paulo, Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04418-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04418-y

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Environmental impacts management
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Maize production