Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of chitosan composites on the immobilization of chromium in soil and marigold (Calendula officinalis) growth

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the effectiveness of various chitosan composites on the stabilization of Cr6+ in contaminated soils and growth characteristics of the marigold plant, a factorial pot trial with completely randomized design and three replications was performed in controlled conditions. The experimental treatments were: the contamination levels of soil to Cr (0, 20, 60 and 180 mg/kg) and adsorbent types (pure chitosan, biochar, zeolite and manganese dioxide, composites of chitosan–biochar, chitosan–zeolite, chitosan–manganese dioxide and control). The results showed that increasing the concentration of Cr in the soil interfered with the processes of nutrient uptake by the marigold and led to a significant reduction in growth characteristics. But the addition of adsorbents to the soil by immobilizing some of the available Cr reduced marigold uptake of Cr and thus reduced its toxic effects. By adding adsorbents to the soil, marigold uptake of nutrients such as phosphorus, potassium and iron was improved, and growth indices increased. Among the adsorbents used in this experiment, the chitosan–manganese dioxide composite had a higher efficiency in the immobilization of Cr in the soil. By applying the chitosan–manganese dioxide composite to the soil at the rate of 0.5% W/W, the concentration of Cr in the shoot of the marigold plant decreased about 87.61% when compared to the control treatment. But the shoot height and shoot dry weight increased by 48.38 and 59.28%, and the concentration of phosphorus, potassium and iron in plant tissues increased by 100.00, 129.62 and 320.33%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal P, Choudhary KK, Singh AK, Chakraborty D (2006) Variation in soil strength and rooting characteristics of wheat in relation to soil management. Geoderma 136:353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Ahmed S, Swami BL, Ikram S (2015) Adsorption of heavy metal ions: role of chitosan and cellulose for water treatment. Int J Pharmacogn 2:280–289

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arabyarmohammadi H, Darban AK, Abdollahy M, Yong R, Ayati B, Zirakjou A, van der Zee SE (2018) Utilization of a novel chitosan/clay/biochar nanobiocomposite for immobilization of heavy metals in acid soil environment. J Polym Environ 26:2107–2119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf MA, Maah MJ, Yusoff I (2014) Soil contamination, risk assessment and remediation. Environmental Risk Assessment of Soil Contamination 3–56.

  • Bower CA, Hatcher JT (1966) Simultaneous determination of surface area and cation-exchange capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:525–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-Total 1. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties 595–624.

  • Burk GA, Herath A, Crisler II GB, Bridges D, Patel S, Pittman Jr CU, Mlsna T (2020) Cadmium and copper removal from aqueous solutions using chitosan-coated gasifier biochar. Front Environ Sci 8.

  • Dinh VP, Nguyen MD, Nguyen QH, Do TTT, Luu TT, Luu AT, Tap TD, Ho TH, Phan TP, Nguyen DT, Tan LV (2020) Chitosan-MnO2 nanocomposite for effective removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution. Chemosphere 257:127–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dogo S, Razic S, Manojlović DD, Slavković LJ (2011) Analysis of the bioavailability of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) based on the determination of chromium in Mentha piperita by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. J Serbian Chem Soc 76:143–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Kafrawy AF, El-Saeed SM, Farag RK, El-Saied HAA, Abdel-Raouf MES (2017) Adsorbents based on natural polymers for removal of some heavy metals from aqueous solution. Egypt J Pet 26:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwakeel KZ, Elgarahy AM, Guibal E (2021) A biogenic tunable sorbent produced from upcycling of aquatic biota-based materials functionalized with methylene blue dye for the removal of chromium (VI) ions. J Environ Chem Eng 9:104767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elwakeel KZ, Shahat A, Al-Bogami AS, Wijesiri B, Goonetilleke A (2020) The synergistic effect of ultrasound power and magnetite incorporation on the sorption/desorption behavior of Cr (VI) and As (V) oxoanions in an aqueous system. J Colloid Interf Sci 569:76–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenti A, Chianese S, Iovino P, Musmarra D, Salvestrini S (2020) Cr (VI) Sorption from Aqueous Solution: A Review. Appl Sci 10:6477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparatos D (2013) Sequestration of heavy metals from soil with Fe–Mn concretions and nodules. Environ Chem Lett 11:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gbaruko BC, Friday OV (2007) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in some fauna and flora. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4:197–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-López ME, Pérez-Fonseca AA, Arellano M, Gómez C, Robledo-Ortíz JR (2020) Fixed-bed adsorption of Cr (VI) onto chitosan supported on highly porous composites. Environ Technol Innovat 19:100824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu S, Kang X, Wang L, Lichtfouse E, Wang C (2019) Clay mineral adsorbents for heavy metal removal from wastewater: a review. Environ Chem Lett 17:629–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Liu A, Lu J, Niu X, Jiang M, Ma Y, Liu X, Li M (2020) Adsorption Mechanism of Hexavalent Chromium on Biochar: Kinetic, Thermodynamic, and Characterization Studies. ACS Omega 5:27323–27331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helmke PH, Spark DL (1996) Potassium. In Sparks DL et al., Method of soil analysis. Published by: Soil Science Society of America, Inc. American Society of Agronomy. Inc. Madison. Wisconsin. USA 551–574.

  • Ifthikar J, Wang J, Wang Q, Wang T, Wang H, Khan A, Jawad A, Sun T, Jiao X, Chen Z (2017) Highly efficient lead distribution by magnetic sewage sludge biochar: sorption mechanisms and bench applications. Bioresour Technol 238:399–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jan FA, Ishaq M, Khan S, Ihsanullah I, Ahmad I, Shakirullah M (2010) A comparative study of human health risks via consumption of food crops grown on wastewater irrigated soil (Peshawar) and relatively clean water irrigated soil (lower Dir). J Hazard Mater 179:612–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorfi S, Ahmadi MJ, Pourfadakari S, Jaafarzadeh N, Soltani RDC, Akbari H (2017) Adsorption of Cr (VI) by natural clinoptilolite zeolite from aqueous solutions: isotherms and kinetics. Polish J Chem Technol 19:106–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid S, Shahid M, Niazi NK, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Dumat C (2017) A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J Geochem Explor 182:247–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis, part 1 physical and mineralogical methods, Arnold Klute ed. Agronomy 9:1–1188.

  • Kulczycki G, Sacała E (2020) Sulfur application alleviates chromium stress in maize and wheat. Open Chem 18:1093–1104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1998) Soil quality and agricultural sustainability. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyva-Ramos R, Jacobo-Azuara A, Diaz-Flores PE, Guerrero-Coronado RM, Mendoza-Barron J, Berber-Mendoza MS (2008) Adsorption of chromium (VI) from an aqueous solution on a surfactant-modified zeolite. Colloids Surf, A Physicochem Eng Asp 330:35–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL, Norvel WA (1978) Development of a DTPA as a soil response investigation of Mn+2 complexation in natural and synthetic organics. Soil Sci Soc Am 46:1137–1143

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydakis-Simantiris N, Fabian M, Skoula M (2016) Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants in heavy metal contaminated soils. Glob Nest J 18:630–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margeta K, Logar NZ, Šiljeg M, Farkaš A (2013) Natural zeolites in water treatment–how effective is their use. Water Treat 5:81–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JAMES, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi Z, Golchin A, Alamdari P (2021) Comparison of the efficiency of different Chitosan composites in immobilisation of Chromium in contaminated soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 1–14.

  • Nelson RE (1982) Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Winsconsin, US: American Society of Agronomy 181–197.

  • Ngah WW, Teong LC, Toh RH, Hanafiah MAKM (2012) Utilization of chitosan–zeolite composite in the removal of Cu (II) from aqueous solution: adsorption, desorption and fixed bed column studies. Chem Eng J 209:46–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orhue ER, Uzu FO (2011) Residual Effect of Chromium on Early Growth of Fluted Pumpkin (Telfairia occidentalis Hook F) in an Ultisol. J Appl Sci Environ Manage 15:493–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey N, Sharma CP (2003) Chromium interference in iron nutrition and water relations of cabbage. Environ Exp Bot 49:195–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qu G, de Varennes A (2009) Use of hydrophilic insoluble polymers in the restoration of metal-contaminated soils. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2009.

  • Reis EDS, Gorza FD, Pedro GDC, Maciel BG, da Silva RJ, Ratkovski GP, de Melo CP (2021) (Maghemite/Chitosan/Polypyrrole) nanocomposites for the efficient removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous media. J Environ Chem Eng 9:104893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saifuddin MN, Kumaran P (2005) Removal of heavy metal from industrial wastewater using chitosan coated oil palm shell charcoal. J Biotechnol 8:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanita L, Fossati F, Musettim R, Mikerezi I, Favali MA (2002) Effects of hexavalent chromium on maize, tomato, and cauliflower plants. J Plant Nutr 25:701–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoccianti V, Crinelli R, Tirillini B, Mancinelli V, Speranza A (2006) Uptake and toxicity of Cr (III) in celery seedlings. Chemosphere 64:1695–1703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker AK (2004) Plasma membrane H+-ATPase and Fe (III) reductase: Key enzymes when engineering tolerance to chromium speciation stress in plants. In Biohorizon 6th National Symposium on Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, 12–13 March, 2004. Indian Institute of Technology.

  • Shanker AK, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S (2005) Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 31:739–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker AK, Pathmanabhan G (2004) Speciation dependant antioxidative response in roots and leaves of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench cv CO 27) under Cr (III) and Cr (VI) stress. Plant Soil 265:141–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Dubey RS (2005) Lead toxicity in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 17:35–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui F, Krishna SK, Tandon PK, Srivastava S (2013) Arsenic accumulation in Ocimum spp. and its effect on growth and oil constituents. Acta Physiol Plant 35:1071–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siedlecka A (1995) Some aspects of interactions between heavy metals and plant mineral nutrients. Acta Soc Bot Pol 64:265–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sposito G, Lund LJ, Chang AC (1982) Trace metal chemistry in arid-zone field soils amended with sewage sludge: I. Fractionation of Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in solid phases. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:260–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaramoorthy P, Chidambaram A, Ganesh KS, Unnikannan P, Baskaran L (2010) Chromium stress in paddy:(i) nutrient status of paddy under chromium stress;(ii) phytoremediation of chromium by aquatic and terrestrial weeds. C R Biol 333:597–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang T, Miller DM (1991) Growth and tissue composition of rice grown in soil treated with inorganic copper, nickel, and arsenic. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22:2037–2045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari KK, Singh NK, Patel MP, Tiwari MR, Rai UN (2011) Metal contamination of soil and translocation in vegetables growing under industrial wastewater irrigated agricultural field of Vadodara, Gujarat, India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:1670–1677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uluçinar Ş, Nur Onar A (2005) Effect of organic Cr (III) complexes on chromium speciation. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 17:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vajpayee P, Tripathi RD, Rai UN, Ali MB, Singh SN (2000) Chromium (VI) accumulation reduces chlorophyll biosynthesis, nitrate reductase activity and protein content in Nymphaea alba L. Chemosphere 41:1075–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace A, Soufi SM, Cha JW, Romney EM (1976) Some effects of chromium toxicity on bush bean plants grown in soil. Plant Soil 44:471–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Zhang X, Sun Y, Wu Z, Li T, Hu Y, Su D, Lv J, Li G, Zhang Z, Zheng L (2015) Transformation and immobilization of chromium by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as revealed by SEM–EDS, TEM–EDS and XAFS. Environ Sci Technol 49:14036–14047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Lan H, Wang H, Liu H, Qu J (2015) Comparing the adsorption behaviors of Cd, Cu and Pb from water onto Fe-Mn binary oxide, MnO 2 and FeOOH. Front Environ Sci Eng 9:385–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccheo P, Genevini PL, Cocucci SM (1982) Chromium ions toxicity on the membrane transport mechanism in segments of maize seedling roots. J Plant Nutr 5:1217–1227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Guan X, Yu B, Ding N, Liu X, Ma Q, Yang S, Yilihamu A, Yang ST (2019) Carboxylated graphene oxide-chitosan spheres immobilize Cu2+ in soil and reduce its bioaccumulation in wheat plants. Environ Int 133:105208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheljazkov V, Jekov D (1995) Heavy metal content in some essential oils and plant extracts. International Symposium on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 426:427–434

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Najafi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility Senthil Kumar Ponnusamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Najafi, Z., Golchin, A. & Naidu, R. The effects of chitosan composites on the immobilization of chromium in soil and marigold (Calendula officinalis) growth. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 6057–6070 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03780-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03780-7

Keywords

Navigation