Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The sustainable development goals and policy capacity: a case study of performance-based budgeting implementation in Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The realization of the goals of sustainable development (SDGs) presupposes administrative policy capacity. The NPM implementation is related to that capacity. Empirical research on this relationship has been conducted rarely in developing countries. To fill this gap, this research aims to study the impact of the policy capacity on the implementation of one of the NMP themes as well as a method to achieve SDGs, namely, performance-based budgeting (PBB) and the impact of PBB on increasing the policy capacity. Iran has been selected for a case study and the data from interviews as well as documents, news, and related scientific papers have been analyzed by a qualitative method. The results showed that 1) one of the requirements for realizing the SDGs is administrative policy capacity. 2) the lack of that capacity caused many problems for the implementation of the PBB by preventing the formulation of the budgeting system change plan and the appropriate annual plan. And, 3) the implementation of PBB did not increase the policy capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agaei Hashjin AA, Kringos DS, Manoochehri J, Aryankhesal A, Klazinga NS (2014) Development and Impact of the Iranian Hospital Performance Measurement Program. BMC Health Serv Res 14(1):448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajam T, Fourie DJ (2016) Public financial management reform in South African provincial basic education departments. Public Admin Dev Public 36(4):263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JM, Clifton J, Díaz-Fuentes D (2011) Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on publics sector size, Cocops Working Paper No. 4, Available: http://www.cocops.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2011/12/COCOPS_workingpaper_No4.pdf

  • Andrews R, Beynon MJ, McDermott A (2019) Configurations of new public management reforms and the efficiency, effectiveness and equity of public healthcare systems: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Pub Manag Rev 21(8):1236–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antwi A, Analoui KB, Nana-Agyekum D (2008) Public sector reform in Sub-Saharan Africa: What can be learnt from the civil service performance improvement programme in Ghana? Pub Adm Dev 28(4):253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar A, Zahedi S, Amirkhani T (2010) Designing a performance-based budgeting model based on system dynamics approach. Iran J Manag Sci 5(18):29–53 (in persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Babajani J, Osta S (2015) A comparative study of performance-based budgeting in Iran and developed countries (A case study of: Canada). Gov Acc 2(3):7–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert G, Loretan R, Troupin S (2016) Public Administration and the Sustainable Development Goals. Written Statement by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Submitted to the 15th session of the United Nations Committee of Experts in Public Administration

  • Brinkerhoff DW, Brinkerhoff JM (2015) Public sector management reform in developing countries: perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Pub Adm Dev 35(4):222–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson D, Wellstead A (2015) Government with a cast of dozens: policy capacity risks and policy work in the Northern Territory. Aust J Public Adm 74(2):162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T (2012) Global ideas and modern public sector reforms: a theoretical elaboration and empirical discussion of a neoinstitutional theory. Am Rev Pub Adm 42(6):635–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirkaya Y (2015) Strategic planning in the Turkish public sector. Transylvanian Rev Adm Sci 2015:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror Y (2001) The capacity to govern: a report to the club of Rome. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards L (2009) Testing the discourse of declining policy capacity: rail policy and the department of transport. Aust J Pub Admin 68(3):288–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng N (2016) Decentralization in Cambodia: New wine in old bottles. Public Adm Dev 36:250–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahmand MA, Etemadzadeh AH (2008) Strategies for deveploying a performance-based budgeting system. Paper Presented at the First International Operational Budget Conference. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-IPBBC01-IPBBC01_002.html. Accessed 18 June 2018

  • Farazmand A (2009) Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: a modest prescription for the twenty-first century. Pub Adm Rev 69(6):1007–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljević T, Novak GL (2020) Integration of migrants through a prism of specific sustainable development goals: a perspective of public administration. Sustain Dev 28(4):1002–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson D, Legge D, O’Neill D, Pfeffer M (2011) Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: comparative lessons to be drawn. J Comp Policy Anal Res Pract 13(3):237–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head B, Ferguson M, Cherney A, Boreham P (2014) Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy Soc 33(2):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y, Lunsford RS, Sides KC, Jones KA (2011) State performance-based budgeting in boom and bust years: an analytical framework and survey of the states. Pub Adm Rev 71(3):370–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M (2011) Designing public policy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeanyibe OM (2016) New public management and administrative reforms in Nigeria. Int J Pub Adm 39(7):563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islamic Parliament Research Center (2007) The problems of budgeting in Iran (A Summary of the Opinions of Budgeting Process Practitioners). Report: Office of Planning and Budget Studies, Subject Code: 230, Serial No. 8862. Available at https://rc.majlis.ir/en

  • Jain P, Jain P (2020) Are the sustainable development goals really sustainable? A policy perspective. Sustain Dev 28(6):1642–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karo E, Kattel R (2010) Coordination of innovation policies in the catching-up context: a historical perspective on Estonia and Brazil. Int J Technol Learn Innovation Dev 3(4):293–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd edn. Sage publication Inc, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Wang TH (2009) Assessing the impact of performance-based budgeting: a comparative analysis across the United States, Taiwan, and China. Pub Admn Review 69:560–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc., California

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y (2007) Performance Budgeting: The Perspective of State Agencies. Public Budgeting Finance 27(4):1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu EY, Mohr Z, Tat-Kei Ho A (2015) Taking stock: assessing and improving performance budgeting theory and practice. Pub Perform Manag Rev 38(3):426–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madi N, Joseph C, Rahma M (2017. Impediments of environment management system (EMS) implementation in malaysian local authorities- A Preliminary Finding. The 17th Annual Conference of the Asian Academic Accounting Association (2016 Four A Conference), 36:7. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173405001

  • Maor M (1999) The paradox of managerialism. Public Adm Rev 59(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey A (2019) Persistent public management reform: an egregore of liberal authoritarianism? Public Money Manag 39(1):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbanda V, Fourie W (2019) The 2030 agenda and coherent national development policy: in dialogue with South African policymakers on policy coherence for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 28(4):751–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melkers JE, Willoughby KG (2001) Budgeters’ views of state performance-budgeting systems: distinctions across branches. Public Adm Rev 61(1):54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghimi M, Pour Azzat AA, DanaeeFard H, Ahmadi H (2017) Describing elements of good governance in policy making of budgeting system in Iran. J Strateg Studies of Public Policy 6(21):31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortynsky S, Marshall J, Mou H (2021) Budget practices in Canada’s K-12 education sector: incremental, performance, or productivity budgeting? Can Pub Adm Adm Publique Du Canada 64(1):74–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal LA, Clark ID (2015) Making reform stick: Political acumen as an element of political capacity for policy change and innovation. Policy Soc 34(3–4):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakmaram A, Esgandari K, BabaeiKoshteli H, Khalili M (2012) Identifying and prioritizing effective factors in the performance based budgeting in telecommunications company with TOPSIS method. Afr J Bus Manage 6(24):7344–7353

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillary (2008) A cultural ecology of new public management soma pillay. Int Rev Adm Sci 74(3):373–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister Strategy Unit. (2004). Strategy Survival Guide, 208 Pages, Available: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk

  • Reddy P, Kauzya JM (2015) Local Government capacity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Region. Pub Policy Adm 14(3):200–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei M (2016) Operational budgeting requirements in Iran. Q J Pub Law 51(18):55–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW (1994) The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public service in Britain. Pol Q 65(1):138–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (2004) Managing development for results: a role for results-oriented public expenditure management. Dev Policy Rev 22(6):623–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel T, Vakkuri J (2015) Institutional change of quasi-market arrangements in local public transportation – Comparative Observations from Germany and Finland. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava 15(3):595–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezen S (2011) International versus domestic explanations of administrative reforms: the case of Turkey. Int Rev Adm Sci 77(2):322–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tat-Kei Ho A (2011) PBB in American local governments: it’s more than a management tool. Public Adm Rev 71(3):391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiernan A (2015) The dilemmas of organisational capacity. Policy Soc 34(3–4):209–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellstead AM, Stedman C (2010) Policy capacity and incapacity in Canada’s federal government: the intersection of policy analysis and street-level bureaucracy. Pub Manag Rev 12(6):893–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A (1961) Political implications of budgetary reform. Public Adm Rev 21(4):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Ramesh M, Howlett M (2015) Policy capacity: a conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy Soc 34(3–4):165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case study research, design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publication, Inc., California

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article has benefited from the input of some scholars. Several anonymous reviewers provided invaluable positive comments and suggestions on improving an earlier version; we are grateful to them. Additionally, we thank Prof. Head for his help in developing the interview questions, Prof. Frazmand for his help in improving the literature, and Dr. Rahmani for his help in translation and language editing. Our deep appreciation goes to all of them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor of Public Policy Making, University of Tehran, Farabi Campus, Qom, Iran

    A. Mirzamani

  2. Assistant Professor of Educational Management, University of Tehran, Farabi Campus, Qom, Iran

    N. Naderi–Beni

  3. Master of management from University of Tehran, Farabi Campus, Qom, Iran

    H. Mohammadian

Authors
  1. A. Mirzamani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Naderi–Beni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Mohammadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mirzamani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Z. Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirzamani, A., Naderi–Beni, N. & Mohammadian, H. The sustainable development goals and policy capacity: a case study of performance-based budgeting implementation in Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 5029–5038 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03709-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03709-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation