Abstract
Selection of sewage treatment systems for protecting water resources within a watershed is a complex problem. It involves environmental, technological, operational and social aspects joint analysis associated with the treatment systems, in addition to raw or treated sewage final disposal receiving watercourses support capacities assessments. The present work proposes a methodology that could help the sewage treatment systems selection process through the combined application of water quality mathematical model, metaheuristic optimization technique (genetic algorithm) and multicriteria analysis method (theory of multi-attribute utility). The study area is the hydrographic basin Benevente River, an important watercourse located in the Espírito Santo state South region, in Brazil. Minimum efficiencies for removing organic matter and nutrients were considered in the sewage treatment systems pre-selection. For the most populous districts, such as Jabaquara, Alfredo Chaves and Alto Pongal, the ordering process, supported by multicriterial analysis, led to the selection of mechanized technologies—activated sludge processes. For all other locations, stabilization pond systems were selected. The methodology described in this work can be generally applied to the planning of wastewater treatment and final disposal in watersheds and subsidize effluents discharge and dilution in watercourses environmental licensing and granting processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral KGC, Aisse MM, Possetti GRC (2019) Sustainability assessment of sludge and biogas management in wastewater treatment plants using the LCA technique. Revista Ambiente & Água 14(5):1–14
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.433, de 8 de janeiro de 1997. Institui a Política Nacional de Recursos Hídricos, cria o Sistema Nacional de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos, regulamenta o inciso XIX do art. 21 da Constituição Federal e altera o art. 1º da Lei nº 8.001, de 13 de março de 1990, que modificou a Lei nº 7.990, de 28 de dezembro de 1989. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF.
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA nº 357, de 17 de marçoo de 2005. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 2005.
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA nº 430, de 13 de maio de 2011. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 2011.
Bringer LM, Reis JAT, dos Mendonça ASF (2018) Wastewater treatment systems selection inside watersheds by using multiobjective analysis. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, v 23
Burn DH, Yulianti JS (2001) Waste-load allocation using genetic algorithms. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(2):121–129
Brunner N, Starkl M, Kazmi AA, Real A, Jain N, Mishra V (2018) Affordability of decentralized wastewater systems: a case study in integrated planning from INDIA. Water 10:1–27
Castillo A, Vall P, Garrido-Baserba M, Comas J, Poch M (2017) Selection of industrial (food, drink and milk sector) wastewater treatment technologies: a multi-criteria assessment. J Clean Prod 143:180–190
Cordeiro netto OM, Souza MAA, Lopes Júnior RP (2001) Retrospectiva e prospecti-va da análise tecnológica das alternativas para pós-tratamento de efluentes de reato-res anaeróbios. In: Carlos Augusto de Lemos Chernicharo. (Org.). Pós- tratamento de Efluentes de Reatores Anaeróbios—Coletânea de Trabalhos Técnicos—Volume 2. 1 ed. Belo Horizonte: PROSAB—Programa de Pesquisa em Saneamento Básico / FINEP—Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos., 2, 253–272
Cornelli R (2014) Análise e seleção de alternativas sustentáveis de esgotamento sanitário. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção)
Chrispim MC, Scholz M, Nolasco MA (2020) A framework for resource recovery from wastewater treatment plants in megacities of developing countries. Environ Res 188:1–14
Dong X, Zeng S, Chen J (2012) A spatial multi-objective optimization model for sustainable urban wastewater system layout planning. Water Sci Tech 267–274
Fantin LLD, Reis JAT, Mendonça ASF (2017) Proposal of a methodology for pre-selection of sewage treatment systems within watersheds. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, v 22
Frank AG, Souza DVSD, Ribeiro JLD, Echeveste ME (2013) A Framework for decision-making in investment alternatives selection. Int J Produc Res 51(19):5866–5883. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.802393
Frank AG, Molle ND, Gerstlberger W, Bernardi JAB, Pedrini DC (2016) An integrative environmental performance index for benchmarking in oil and gas industry. J Clean Prod 133:1190–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.064
Garrido-Baserba M, Reif R, Molinos-Senante M, Larrea L, Castillo A, Verdaguer M, Poch M (2016) Application of a multi-criteria decision model to select of design choices for WWTPs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18(4):1097–1109
Goffi AS, Trojan F, Lima JD, Lizot M, Thesari SS (2018) Economic feasibility for selecting wastewater treatment systems. Water Sci Tech 2518–2531
Harris-Lovett S, Lienert J, Sedlak D (2018) Towards a new paradigm of urban water infrastructure: identifying goals and strategies to support multi-benefit municipal wastewater treatment. Water 10:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091127
Hoffmann R (2010) Desigualdade da renda e das despesas per capita no Brasil em 2002–2003 e 2008–2009 e avaliação do grau de progressividade ou regressividade de parcelas da renda familiar. Economia e Sociedade 19(3):647–661
Horne A, Szemis JM, Kaur S, Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Costa A, Boland N (2016) Optimization tools for environmental water decisions: a review of strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities to improve adoption. Environ Modell Softw 84:326–338
Instituto Estadual and de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos. As Bacias Hidrográficas do Estado do Espírito Santo.2013.Disponível em:http:, , www.iema.es.gov.br: Acesso em 10 de maio.2020. , 2013 IEMA. Instituto Estadual de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos. As Bacias Hidrográficas do Estado do Espírito Santo. 2013. Disponível em:<http://www.iema.es.gov.br:.> Acesso em 10 de maio. 2020.
Iqbal Z, Abbas F, Ibrahim M, Mahmood A, Gul M, Imran Qureshi T (2021) Ecological risk assessment of soils under different wastewater irrigation farming system in Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Environ Sci Tech https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03237-x.
Jordão EP, Pessoa CA (2005) Tratamento de esgotos domésticos. ABES, Rio de Janeiro
Jordão EP, Pessoa CA (2014) Tratamento de esgotos domésticos. ABES, Rio de Janeiro
Karimi AR, Mehrdadi N, Hashemian SJ, Nabi BGR, Tavakkoli MR (2011) Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. Int J Environ Sci Tech 8(2):267–280
Latif EF, Elmolla ES, Mahmoud UF, Saleh MM (2020) Intermittent cycle extended aeration system pilot scale (ICEAS-PS) for wastewater treatment: experimental results and process simulation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:3261–3270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02653-9
Li YP, Tang CY, Yu ZB, Acharya K (2013) Correlations between algae and water quality: factors driving eutrophication in Lake Taihu, China. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0436-4
LUME Estratégia Ambiental Ltda (2013)Enquadramento dos Corpos de Água e Plano de Recursos Hídricos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Benevente – REA—Relatório da Etapa A: Diagnóstico e Prognóstico
LUME Estratégia Ambiental Ltda (2015) Enquadramento dos Corpos de Água e Plano de Recursos Hídricos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Benevente – RS—Relatórios Síntese
Markov Z, Jovanoski I, Domitroviski D (2017) Multi-criteria analysis approach for selection of the most appropriate technology for municipal wastewater treatment. J Environ Prot Ecol 18(1):289–303
Marsh MT, Schilling DA (1994) Equity measurement in facility location analysis: a review and Framework. Eur J Oper Res 74:1–17
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Regional (BR) (2020) SNIS - Sistema nacional de informações sobre saneamento. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Regional, Brasília. Disponível em: http://www.snis.gov.br
Molinos M, Caballero R, Sala-Garrido R, Núñes TG, Hernández-Sancho F (2015) Assessment of wastewater treatment alternatives for small com-munities: an analytic network process approach. Sci Total Environ 532:676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.059
Mulligan GF (1991) Equality measures and facility location. Reg Sci 70(4):345–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434593
Musiyarira H, Reynders CC, Marjanovic P (2012) Decision making support in wastewater management: comparative analysis of techniques and tools used in centralized and decentralized system layouts UDK 628.2. J Econ Develop 1(1):71–90
Nguyen TT, Keupers I, Willems P (2018) Conceptual river water quality model with flexible model structure. Environ Model Softw 104:102–117
Never B, Stepping K (2018) Comparing urban wastewater systems in India and Brazil: options for energy efficiency and wastewater reuse. Water Policy 20:1129–1144
Plakas KV, Georgiadis AA, Karabelas AJ (2016) Sustainability assessment of tertiary wastewater treatment technologies: a multi-criteria analysis. Water Sci Tech 1532–1540
REIS AOP (2018) Sistemática para seleção de tecnologias de tratamento de efluentes: uma análise multicriterial aplicada à bacia hidrográfica. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção)—Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre
Reis JAT, Valory JLP, Mendonça ASF (2015) Seleção de eficiências de tratamento de esgotos a partir da manutenção de equidade entre sistemas de tratamento - uma aborda-gem para o gerenciamento de bacias hidrográficas. Revista Brasileira De Recursos Hídricos 20(4):862–871
Ren J, Liang H (2017) Multi-criteria group decision-making based sustainability measurement of wastewater treatment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev 65:91–99
Rodrigues DBB, Gomes A, Ide CN, Oliveira PTS, Cavazzana G (2009) Análise da qualidade da água de Rio Anhanduí – MS utilizando o modelo QUAL-UFMG. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE RECURSOS HÍDRICOS. Anais eletrônicos. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul
Rodrigues MB (2018) Emprego de curvas de Permanência de Qualidade como Subsídio ao Processo de Enquadramento de Cursos D’Água. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental) – Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES). Vitória
Sá GLN, Reis JATD, Mendonça ASF, Silva FGB (2019) Methodology for minimum nitrogen compounds removal efficiencies estimation and wastewater treatment systems pre-selection: a watershed approach. Revista Brasileira De Recursos Hídricos 24:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.241920180173
Santoro MC, Reis JATD, Mendonça ASF (2016) Performance evaluation of optimization models in the determination of wastewater treatment efficiencies inside watersheds. Revista Brasileira De Recursos Hídricos 21(4):694–706. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.011616031
Souza MAA (1992) Methodology for Selection of Wastewater Treatment Processes. PhD Thesis. The University of Birmingham. Birmingham.
Sun T, Zhang H, Wang Y, Meng X, Wang C (2010) The application of environmental Gini coefficient (EGC) in allocating wastewater discharge permit: The case study of watershed total mass control in Tianjin, China. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:601–608
Sun Y, Chen Z, Wu G, Wu Q, Zhang F, Niu Z, Hu H (2016) Characteristics of water quality of municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: implications for resources utilization and management. J Clean Prod 131:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.068
Tavakoly Sany SB, Monazami G, Rezayi M, Tajfard M, Borgheipour H (2018) Application of water quality indices for evaluating water quality and anthropogenic impact assessment. Int J Environ Sci Tech 16:3001–3012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1894-5
Tecle A, Fogel M, Duckstein L (1988) Multicriterion Selection of wastewater management alternatives. J Water Res Plann Manage Div Proceedings of ASCE 114(4), 383–398
Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL (1991) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal and reuse. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA
United Nations (2003) Waste-water treatment technologies: a general review. New York, Uni-ted Nations. p 122
Valory JPL, Reis JAT dos, Mendonça ASF (2016) Combining Genetic Algorithms with a Water Quality Model to Determine Efficiencies of Sewage Treatment Systems in Watersheds. Journal of Environmental Engineering (New York, N.Y.), v. 142, p 04015080–04015080–
Vervloet RJ, Ross JLS (2013) Associação Entre Fatos Geomórficos e os Dobramentos de Fundo na Evolução de uma Rede de Drenagem na Margem Atlântica do Planalto Brasileiro: O Caso da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Benevente–ES. GEOUSP: Espaço e Tempo (Online) 35, 174–191
Von Sperling M (2005) Princípios de Tratamento Biológico de Águas Residuárias: Introdução à qualidade das águas e ao tratamento de esgotos. Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 240 p
Von Sperling M (2007) Princípios do tratamento biológico de águas residuárias. Volume 7. Estudos e modelagem da qualidade da água de rios. Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental – UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 588 p
Von Sperling M (2014) Introdução à qualidade das águas e ao tratamento de esgotos. Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 472 p
Zeferino JA, Cunha MC, Antunes AP (2017) Adapted optimization model for planning regional wastewater systems: case study. Water Sci Tech 1196–1205
Wondim TT, Dzwairo B (2018) A scenario-based multiple attribute decision-making approach for site selection of a wastewater treatment plant: Bahir Dar City (Ethiopia) case study. Water SA 44(4):782–794. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v44i4.26
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Jing Chen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Almeida, K.N., dos Reis, J.A.T., Mendonça, A.S.F. et al. Methodology to support the planning of sewage treatment systems within river basins. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 3741–3756 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03387-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03387-y