Abstract
Wetlands play an important role in the life of the planet. In order to preserve and revive the wetlands, decision-makers need to employ appropriate approaches and tools to identify the main driving forces and this could be an important step toward adopting effective strategies and making critical decisions. The current study used the combined analytic network process with driving forces-pressures-state-impacts-responses framework in mulino decision support system. The Parishan wetland, located in Iran, has been selected as the case study. After an initial study of the conditions of Parishan wetland and identifying the stakeholders, the opinions of experts and local residents were gathered to identify the most important parameters influencing the conditions of the wetland. The analytic network process model was used to improve and reduce the number of input parameters to mulino decision support system. Then, the most important and the best responses associated with the management of Parishan wetland were identified through questionnaires and imported into mulino decision support system along with other components. Finally, the mulino decision support system decision algorithm was run. The findings revealed that reduced precipitation, land-use change, competition of farmers in the wetland to use water resources, and increased temperature were the main driving forces. Moreover, water transfer from the Nargesi Dam was chosen as the most effective response. The results suggest that the driving forces-pressures-state-impacts-responses framework in mulino decision support system algorithm combined with analytic network process model can be used as an integrated tool to study and manage wetland socio-ecological ecosystems.










Similar content being viewed by others
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abbasspour M, Abedi Z, Ahmadian M, Zafari F (2013) Economic valuation of market oriented outputs for environmental sources in Arjan-Parishan Lake (with in emphasis aquatic species). J Environ Sci Technol 15:79–93
Ahmadi Mirghaed F, Mohammadzadeh M, Salmanmahiny A, Mirkarimi SH (2020) Assessing the interactions between landscape aesthetic quality and spatial indices in Gharasoo watershed, North of Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02342-2
Aliani H, BabaieKafaky S, Saffari A, Monavari SM (2017) Land evaluation for ecotourism development-an integrated approach based on FUZZY, WLC, and ANP methods. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1291-5
Atkins JP, Burdon D, Elliott M, Gregory AJ (2011) Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Mar Pollut Bull 62:215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.12.012
Azizi A, Malekmohammadi B, Jafari HR, Nasiri H, Parsa VA (2014) Land suitability assessment for wind power plant site selection using ANP-DEMATEL in a GIS environment: case study of Ardabil province. Iran Environ Monit Assess 186:6695–6709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3883-6
Banai R, Wakolbinger T (2011) A measure of regional influence with the analytic network process. Soc Econ Plan Sci 45:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2011.07.001
Benini L, Bandini V, Marazza D, Contin A (2010) Assessment of land use changes through an indicator-based approach: A case study from the Lamone river basin in Northern Italy. Ecol Indic 10:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.016
Bottero M, Ferretti V (2010) Integrating the analytic network process (ANP) and the driving force-pressure-state-impact- responses (DPSIR) model for the sustainability assessment of territorial transformations. Manag Environ Qual 21:618–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831011067926
Bournaski EG, Kirilov LM, Iliev RS, Diadovski I (2006) Decision support for water quality management. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer systems and technologies–CompSysTech, Vol. 6
Chaudhary P, Chhetri SK, Joshi KM, Shrestha BM, Kayastha P (2016) Application of an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in the GIS interface for suitable fire site selection: a case study from Kathmandu Metropolitan City. Nepal Soc Econ Plan Sci 53:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2015.10.001
Chuang YH, Yu RF, Chen WY, Chen HW, Su YT (2018) Sustainable planning for a coastal wetland system with an integrated ANP and DPSIR model for conflict resolution. Wetlands Ecol Manage 26:1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-018-9627-6
Davidson NC (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res 65:934–941. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14173
Dehghani A (2005) Ecosystem of Parishan lagoon. Naghsh-e- Mehr, Tehran
Dragoi M (2018) Joining or not joining non-industrial private forests into a single management unit: a case-study shaped as an analytic network process. For Policy Econ 89:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.001
Eskandari T, Malekmohammadi B, Zebardast L, Azizi A (2017) Integrated environmental assessment of groundwater depletion in Ardebil plain for management solutions. J Environ Stud 42:687–707
ESRI R (2011) ArcGIS desktop. Environmental systems research institute web. https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap. Accessed 12 June 2011
Everest T, Sungur A, Özcan H (2020) Determination of agricultural land suitability with a multiple-criteria decision-making method in Northwestern Turkey. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02869-9
Exelis Visual Information Solutions (2013) Environment for visualizing images (ENVI). https://www.l3harrisgeospatial.com/docs/tutorials.html. Accessed 02 June 2013
Fadul E, Masih I, De Fraiture C (2019) Adaptation strategies to cope with low, high and untimely floods: lessons from the Gash spate irrigation system. Sudan Agric Water Manag 217:212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.035
Fars Department of Environmental Protection (2009) Report on finding lake Parishan pollution resources. Fars Environment Provincial Office
Fassio A, Giupponi C, Hiederer R, Simota C (2005) A decision support tool for simulating the effects of alternative policies affecting water resources: an application at the European scale. J Hydrol 304:462–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.048
Finlayson CM (2012) Forty years of wetland conservation and wise use. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 22:139–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2233
Gari SR, Newton A, Icely JD (2015) A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coast Manag 103:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.013
Giupponi C (2007) Decision support systems for implementing the European water framework directive: the MULINO approach. Environ Model Softw 22:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.024
Giupponi C, Cojocaru G, Féas J, Mysiak J, Rosato P, Zucca A (2010) mDSS users guide- 5.12. http://www.netsymod.eu/mdss/mDSS5_Users_guide. Accessed 16 May 2010
Hossain MS, Szabo S (2017) Understanding the Social-ecological system of wetlands. In: Prusty B, Chandra R, Azeez P (eds) Wetland science. Springer, New Delhi, pp 285–300
Hossain MS, Hein L, Rip FI, Dearing JA (2015) Integrating ecosystem services and climate change responses in coastal wetlands development plans for Bangladesh. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 20:241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9489-4
Hu S, Niu Z, Chen Y, Li L, Zhang H (2017) Global wetlands: Potential distribution, wetland loss, and status. Sci Total Environ 586:319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.001
Huang L, Wang B, Niu X, Gao P, Song Q (2019) Changes in ecosystem services and an analysis of driving factors for China’s Natural Forest Conservation Program. Ecol Evol 9:3700–3716. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4925
Iran Water Resources Management Company (2009) National inventory of water resources. Office of Basic Water Resources Studies Ministry of Energy, Washington
Karim M, Maanan M, Maanan M, Rhinane H, Rueff H, Baidder L (2019) Assessment of water body change and sedimentation rate in Moulay Bousselham wetland, Morocco, using geospatial technologies. Int J Sediment Res 34:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.08.007
Khajeh M, Bazrafshan O, Vagharfard H, Esmaeelpoor Y (2015) An investigation on the quantity and quality of groundwater in the Parishan Plain. MJSP 18:71–96
Lami IM (2014) Analytical decision-making methods for evaluating sustainable transport in European corridors. Springer, Cham
Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001
Lin T, Xue XZ, Lu CY (2007a) Analysis of coastal wetland changes using the DPSIR model: a case study in Xiamen, China. Coast Manage 35:289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750601169592
Lin T, Xue XZ, Lu CY (2007b) Analysis of coastal wetland changes using the “DPSIR” model: a case study in Xiamen, China. Coast Manage 35:289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750601169592
Lotfi A (2011) Lake Parishan a concise baseline report. Conversion of Iranian Wetlands Project UNDP/GEF Fars Environment Provincial Office, Washington
Malekmohammadi B, Jahanishakib F (2017) Vulnerability assessment of wetland landscape ecosystem services using driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model. Ecol Indic 82:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.060
Mateus M, Almeida D, Simonson W, Felgueiras M, Banza P, Batty L (2016) Conflictive uses of coastal areas: a case study in a southern European coastal lagoon (Ria de Alvor, Portugal). Ocean Coast Manag 132:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.08.016
Mysiak J, Giupponi C, Fassio A (2002) Decision Support for Water resource management: an application example of the MULINO DSS. In: 1st international congress on environmental modelling and software - Lugano, Switzerland
Mysiak J, Giupponi C, Rosato P (2005) Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management. Environ Model Softw 20:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.019
Ordoo S, Owfi F (2012) Environmental analysis of the international wetland of Parishan on the basis of the SWOT management model. J Anim Biol 5:1–9
Pinto R, da Conceição CM, Roseta-Palma C, Marques JC (2014) Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system. Environ Process 1:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-014-0006-x
Rahman MA (2011) Decision support for managed aquifer recharge (MAR) project planning to mitigate water scarcity based on non-conventional water resources. dissertation, University of Göttingen
Saadati S, Motevallian SS, Rheinheimer DE, Najafi H (2013) Indicators for sustainable management of wetland ecosystems using a DPSIR approach: A case study in Iran. In 6th International perspective on water resources & the environment conference (IPWE).
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS, Pennsylvania
Saaty TL (2004) Decision making-the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
Safi M (2011) Management and multi-criteria decision modeling of water resources using the MULINO DSS. Environ Manag Plann 1(2):73–79
Satty TL (2001) The analytic network process: decision making with dependence and feedback. RWS, Pennsylvania
Shafiei M, Raeini Sarjaz M, Ramin F, Gholami MA (2012) The role of human factors in lowering the level of water in the Parishan Wetland. Int J Environ Sci Bioeng 00(53–54):41–44
Wantzen KM, Alves CBM, Badiane SD, Bala R, Blettler M, Callisto M et al (2019) Urban stream and wetland restoration in the global South-A DPSIR analysis. Sustainability 11:4975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184975
Wei JY, Zhao XY, Sun XS (2019) The evaluation model of the enterprise energy efficiency based on DPSR. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:16835–16846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9096-0
Wolfslehner B, Vacik H (2011) Mapping indicator models: from intuitive problem structuring to quantified decision-making in sustainable forest management. Ecol Indic 11:274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.05.004
Xue H, Li S, Chang J (2015) Combining ecosystem service relationships and DPSIR framework to manage multiple ecosystem services. Environ Monit Assess 187:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4303-2
Zhou J, Shen L, Song X, Zhang X (2015) Selection and modeling sustainable urbanization indicators: a responsibility-based method. Ecol Indic 56:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.024
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Fars Department of Environment for their cooperation. The authors would like to thank the four reviewers for their constructive comments on the correction and improvement of the manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by GZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GZ and BM, HJ, ARY and AN commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Ta Yeong Wu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zare, G., Malekmohammadi, B., Jafari, H. et al. Management of socio-ecological wetland systems using mulino decision support system and analytic network process. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 2559–2572 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03368-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03368-1


