Abstract
In Brazil and in many other developing countries, the collection and treatment of domestic sewage is not universal. A solution to this problem would be the implementation of decentralized systems. However, there is a lack of studies that can contribute to the decision-making process on the best system to be adopted: onsite or cluster. Thus, this study evaluated the implementation costs of sewer main line and wastewater treatment system, aiming to determine when the onsite system (septic tank + seepage pit) is more economically viable than the cluster system (septic tank + anaerobic filter). The design calculation for each technology was conducted based on the Brazilian's standards and the number of inhabitants was variable between 4 people for one single residence, up to 1,000 inhabitants for cluster system. Then, an analysis evaluated the system's cost for implementation. The results pointed out three distinct scenarios, showing the interference of distance between households in the total cost of the system. In distances up to 18 m, the cluster system is economically more viable than the onsite system; between 19 and 75 m, the cluster system is more viable than the onsite from a minimum number of contributors; from 76 m on, the onsite system will always be the most economically viable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas - ABNT (1993) Projeto, construção e operação de sistemas de tanques sépticos. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas.
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas - ABNT (1997) Tanques sépticos – Unidades de tratamento complementar e disposição final dos efluentes lı́quidos–Projeto, construção e operação. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas
Andrade Neto CO, Além Sobrinho P, Melo HNS, Aisse MM (1999a) Decanto-digestores, pages 117–138. ABES
Andrade Neto CO, Campos JR, Além Sobrinho P, Chernicharo CAL, Nour EA (1999b) Filtros anaeróbios, pages 139–154. ABES
Bieker S, Cornel P, Wagner M (2010) Semicentralised supply and treatment systems: integrated infrastructure solutions for fast growing urban areas. Water Sci Technol 61(11):2905–2913. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.189
Brasil (2012). Law n. 12.651. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm. Online; accessed 11 jun. 2019.
Brasil (2019). Programa Nacional de Saneamento Rural – PNSR. Ministério da Saúde. http://www.funasa.gov.br/documents/20182/38564/MNL_PNSR_2019.pdf/08d94216-fb09-468e-ac98-afb4ed0483eb. Online; accessed 11 jun. 2019
Chernicharo CAL (2010) Reatores anaeróbios: princı́pios do tratamento biológico de águas residuárias. UFMG
de Oliveira Cruz LM, Gomes BGLA, Tonetti AL, Figueiredo ICS (2019) Using coconut husks in a full-scale decentralized wastewater treatment system: the influence of an anaerobic filter on maintenance and operational conditions of a sand filter. Ecol Eng 127:454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.021
De Oliveira Cruz LM, Stefanutti R, Filho BC, Tonetti AL (2013) Coconut shells as filling material for anaerobic filters. Springerplus 2(1):655. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-655
De Oliveira Cruz LM, Tonetti AL, Gomes BGLA (2018) Association of septic tank and sand filter for wastewater treatment: full-scale feasibility for decentralized sanitation. J Water Sanitation Hygiene Dev 8(2):268–277. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2018.094
Gikas P, Tchobanoglous G (2009) The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management. J Environ Manag 90(1):144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.016
Harman J, Robertson WD, Cherry JA, Zanini L (1996) Impacts on a sand aquifer from an old septic system: nitrate and phosphate. Groundwater 34(6):1105–1114
Hong SW, Choi YS, Kim SJ, Kwon G (2005) Pilot-testing an alternative on-site wastewater treatment system for small communities and its automatic control. Water Sci Technol 51(10):101–108. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0356
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE (2017) Pesquisa Nacional de Saneamento Básico. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/multidominio/meio-ambiente/9073-pesquisa-nacional-de-saneamento-basico.html?=&t=o-que-e. Online; accessed 05 dec. 2018
[Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística] IBGE (2010) Censo Nacional 2010. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/populacao/9662-censo-demografico-2010.html?edicao=10503&t=resultados. Online; accessed 05 dec. 2018
Jantrania AR, Gross MA (2006) Advanced onsite wastewater systems technologies. CRC Press
Jung YT, Narayanan N, Cheng YL (2018) Cost comparison of centralized and decentralized wastewater management systems using optimization model. J Environ Manag 213:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.081
Landau EC, Moura L (2016) Variação geográfica do saneamento básico no Brasil em 2010: domicı́lios urbanos e rurais. Embrapa Milho e Soja
Lens P, Zeeman G, Lettinga G (2001) Decentralised sanitation and reuse. IWA publishing, London
Libralato G, Ghirardini AV, Avezzù F, (2012) To centralise or to decentralise: an overview of the most recent trends in wastewater treatment management. J Environ Manag 94(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.010
Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 90(1):652–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001
Mbuligwe SE (2004) Comparative effectiveness of engineered wetland systems in the treatment of anaerobically pre-treated domestic wastewater. Ecol Eng 23(4–5):269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.09.009
Moussavi G, Kazembeigi F, Farzadkia M (2010) Performance of a pilot scale up-flow septic tank for on-site decentralized treatment of residential wastewater. Process Saf Environ Prot 88(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2009.10.001
Parkinson J, Tayler K (2003) Decentralized wastewater management in peri-urban areas in low-income countries. Environ Urban 15(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780301500119
Silva JCP, Tonetti AL, Leonel LP, Costa A (2015) Denitrification on upflow-anaerobic filter filled with coconut shells (cocos nucifera). Ecol Eng 82:474–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.007
SINAPI (2018) Índices da Construção Civil. http://www.caixa.gov.br/poder-publico/apoio-poder-publico/sinapi/Paginas/default.aspx. Online; accessed 08 apr. 2018.
Tonetti AL, Brasil AL, Lillo MFJP, Figueiredo ICS, Schneider J, Cruz LMO, Duarte NC, Fernandes PM, Coasaca RL, Garcia RS, Magalhães TM (2018a) Tratamento de esgotos domésticos em comunidades isoladas: referencial para a escolha de soluções. Biblioteca UNICAMP
Tonetti AL, Duarte NC, Figueiredo ICS, Brasil AL (2018) Alternativas para o gerenciamento de lodo de sistemas descentralizados de tratamento de esgotos de áreas rurais. Labor e Engenho 12(1):145–152
United States Environmental Protection Agency - USEPA (1997) Response to congress on use of decentralized wastewater treatment systems. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water
United States Environmental Protection Agency - USEPA (2004) Primer for municipal wastewater treatment systems. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water
United Nations Children's Fund - UNICEF (2015) Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2015 update and SDG baselines. World Health Organization
United Nations Children's Fund - UNICEF (2017) Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines. World Health Organization
Wakida FT, Lerner DN (2005) Nonagricultural sources of groundwater nitrate: a review and case study. Water Res 39(1):3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.026
Whelan B (1988) Disposal of septic tank effluent in calcareous sands. J Environ Qual 17(2):272–277
Wilderer P, Schreff D (2000) Decentralized and centralized wastewater management: a challenge for technology developers. Water Sci Technol 41(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0001
Wu S, Tang SW, Thibault S, Zhao X, Zhao L (2011) Comparison and analysis of the design calculation methods of septic tank at home and aboard. Advan Mater Res 374–377:712–716
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Case No. 471833/2011-8) and Konrad Adenauer Foundation for the scholarships granted, as well as FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation, Process No. 2017/07490-4). The authors also thank the services provided by Espaço da Escrita/General Coordination of UNICAMP in helping translate the original manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tonetti, A.L., Figueiredo, I.C.S., Madrid, F.J.P.L. et al. Cost confrontation study for decentralized wastewater treatment: When to adopt a cluster or onsite system?. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 3529–3538 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03327-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03327-w