Abstract
Forward osmosis (FO) is the most promising upcoming desalination technique which requires more detailed researches to reduce its challenges like low pure water flux and high reverse solute flux. This paper represents the fabrication of thin-film nanocomposite polyethersulfone membrane with 0.005 wt% of silica nanoparticle (SiNPs) loading and analysis of FO performance of the fabricated TFN membrane. The nanoparticle was incorporated into the polyamide active rejection layer by interfacial polymerization. Membrane characterizations like ATR-FTIR, SEM, and wettability analysis were done. Successful nanoparticle incorporation was confirmed by ATR-FTIR analysis. Rise in hydrophilicity of TFN membrane was confirmed surface wettability measurements. The effect on draw solution concentration as well as cross-flow rate on membrane performance was analyzed. Comparison of forward osmosis performance with various inorganic draw solutes was also tested. The draw solutes considered were KCl, NaCl, and CaCl2 due to its various applications in fertigation and desalination. The filtration parameters of the fabricated membranes are analyzed and enlisted. The membrane FO performance under AL-FS and AL-DS modes of operation was tested. Results show that fabricated TFN membrane obtains a maximum flux of 23.93LMH in AL-DS mode, and salt rejection was 91%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Pure water permeability
- AL-FS:
-
Active layer facing feed side
- AL-DS:
-
Active layer facing draw side
- B :
-
Salt permeability
- CNF:
-
Carbon nanofibre
- CTA:
-
Cellulose triacetate
- DI:
-
Deionized
- DS:
-
Draw solution
- FO:
-
Forward osmosis
- FTIR:
-
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
- FS:
-
Feed solution
- IP:
-
Interfacial polymerization
- J w :
-
Pure water flux
- J S :
-
Reverse solute flux
- MOFs:
-
Metal–organic frameworks
- MPD:
-
m-phenylenediamine
- NIPS:
-
Non-solvent induced phase separation
- NF:
-
Nanofiltration
- PA:
-
Polyamide
- PDA:
-
Polydopamine
- PVP:
-
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
- PES:
-
Polyethersulfone
- PEG:
-
Polyethylene glycol
- ppm:
-
Parts per million
- R :
-
Salt rejection
- RO:
-
Reverse osmosis
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
- SiNPs:
-
Silica nanoparticles
- S :
-
Structural parameter
- TDS:
-
Total dissolved solids
- TFC:
-
Thin-film composite
- TFN:
-
Thin-film nanocomposite
- WCA:
-
Water contact angle
References
Achilli A, Cath TY, Childress AE (2010) Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.010
Ahmed M, Kumar R, Al-Wazzan Y, Garudachari B, Thomas JP (2018) Assessment of performance of inorganic draw solutions tested in forward osmosis process for desalinating arabian gulf seawater. Arab J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3394-9
Amini M, Seifi M, Akbari A, Hosseinifard M (2020) Polyamide-zinc oxide-based thin film nanocomposite membranes: towards improved performance for forward osmosis. Polyhedron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2020.114362
Berbar Y, Amara M, Ammi-said A, Yuan S (2017) New method for silica embedding on a PES membrane surface via in situ sol gel process and immobilization in a polyamide thin film composite. J Environ Chem Eng 5(4):3604–3615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.008
Chanukya BS, Patil S, Rastogi NK (2013) Influence of concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis during desalination using ammonium bicarbonate. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.018
Chiao YH, Sengupta A, Chen ST, Hung WS, Lai JY, Upadhyaya L, Qian X, Wickramasinghe SR (2020) Novel thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane using polyethylenimine and its impact on membrane performance. Sep Sci Technol (Philadelphia). https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2019.1567552
Daer S, Akther N, Wei Q, Shon HK, Hasan SW (2020) Influence of silica nanoparticles on the desalination performance of forward osmosis polybenzimidazole membranes. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114441
Duarte AP, Cidade MT, Bordado JC (2006) Cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membranes: optimization of the composition. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23237
Dutta S, Dave P, Nath K (2020) Performance of low pressure nanofiltration membrane in forward osmosis using magnesium chloride as draw solute. J Water Process Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101092
Ghaffour N, Missimer TM, Amy GL (2013) Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability. Desalination 309:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.015
Ghanbari M, Emadzadeh D, Lau WJ, Riazi H, Almasi D, Ismail AF (2016) Minimizing structural parameter of thin film composite forward osmosis membranes using polysulfone/halloysite nanotubes as membrane substrates. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.019
Hancock NT, Cath TY (2009) Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901132x
He M, Wang L, Lv Y, Wang X, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Liu T (2020) Novel polydopamine/metal organic framework thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane for salt rejection and heavy metal removal. Chem Eng J 389:124452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124452
Huang Y, Jin H, Yu P, Luo Y (2016) Polyamide thin-film composite membrane based on nano-silica modified polysulfone microporous support layer for forward osmosis. Desalin Water Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1108874
Lau WJ, Gray S, Matsuura T, Emadzadeh D, Paul Chen J, Ismail AF (2015) A review on polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes: history, applications, challenges and approaches. Water Res 80:306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.037
Lee WJ, Goh PS, Lau WJ, Ong CS, Ismail AF (2019) Antifouling zwitterion embedded forward osmosis thin film composite membrane for highly concentrated oily wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.009
Lin J, Ye W, Zhong K, Shen J, Jullok N, Sotto A, van der Bruggen B (2016) Enhancement of polyethersulfone (PES) membrane doped by monodisperse Stöber silica for water treatment. Chem Eng Process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.03.011
Liu X, Ng HY (2015) Fabrication of layered silica-polysulfone mixed matrix substrate membrane for enhancing performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.012
Liu J, Chen P, Qin D, Jia S, Jia C, Li L, Bian H, Wei J, Shao Z (2020) Nanocomposites membranes from cellulose nanofibers, SiO2 and carboxymethyl cellulose with improved properties. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115818
Loeb S, Titelman L, Korngold E, Freiman J (1997) Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J Membr Sci 129(2):243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00354-7
Lutchmiah K, Verliefde ARD, Roest K, Rietveld LC, Cornelissen ER (2014) Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res 58:179–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.045
Machodi MJ, Daramola MO (2019) Synthesis and performance evaluation of PES/chitosan membranes coated with polyamide for acid mine drainage treatment. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53512-8
McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M (2006) Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049
Mohammadifakhr M, de Grooth J, Roesink HDW, Kemperman AJB (2020) Forward osmosis: a critical review. Processes 8(4):1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8040404
Nguyen HT, Nguyen NC, Chen SS, Ngo HH, Guo W, Li CW (2015) A new class of draw solutions for minimizing reverse salt flux to improve forward osmosis desalination. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.156
Niksefat N, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A (2014) The effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on morphology and performance of thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis application. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.031
Obaid M, Kang Y, Wang S, Yoon MH, Kim CM, Song JH, Kim IS (2018) Fabrication of highly permeable thin-film nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes: via the design of novel freestanding robust nanofiber substrates. J Mater Chem A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta11320j
Peyki A, Rahimpour A, Jahanshahi M (2015) Preparation and characterization of thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes incorporated with hydrophilic SiO2 nanoparticles. Desalination 368:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.025
Rastgar M, Shakeri A, Salehi H (2019) Study of polyamide thin film characteristics impact on permeability/selectivity performance and fouling behavior of forward osmosis membrane. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0043-x
Shen JN, Ruan HM, Wu LG, Gao CJ (2011) Preparation and characterization of PES-SiO2 organic-inorganic composite ultrafiltration membrane for raw water pretreatment. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.039
Subramani A, Jacangelo JG (2015) Emerging desalination technologies for water treatment: a critical review. Water Res 75:164–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.032
Suwaileh W, Pathak N, Shon H, Hilal N (2020) Forward osmosis membranes and processes: a comprehensive review of research trends and future outlook. Desalination 485(April):114455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114455
Tharayil JM, Manaf A, Nittin Johnson J (2020) Sustainable forward osmosis desalination: a review on polymeric membranes and flux parameters. Int J Environ Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1784414
Tian M, Wang YN, Wang R, Fane AG (2017) Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes supported by silica nanoparticle incorporated nanofibrous substrate. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.04.003
Valladares Linares R, Bucs SS, Li Z, AbuGhdeeb M, Amy G, Vrouwenvelder JS (2014) Impact of spacer thickness on biofouling in forward osmosis. Water Res 57:223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.046
Wei J, Qiu C, Tang CY, Wang R, Fane AG (2011) Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.013
Wen P, Chen Y, Hu X, Cheng B, Liu D, Zhang Y, Nair S (2017) Polyamide thin film composite nanofiltration membrane modified with acyl chlorided graphene oxide. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.043
Xie Y, Ma R, Xia S (2013) Preliminary studies of water treatment using forward osmosis. Desalin Water Treatment 51(4–6):800–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.714926
Xie M, Luo W, Guo H, Nghiem LD, Tang CY, Gray SR (2018) Trace organic contaminant rejection by aquaporin forward osmosis membrane: transport mechanisms and membrane stability. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.072
Yip NY, Tiraferri A, Phillip WA, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M (2010) High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1002555
Zhou Z, Lee JY, Chung TS (2014) Thin film composite forward-osmosis membranes with enhanced internal osmotic pressure for internal concentration polarization reduction. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.049
Acknowledgments
Likely to acknowledge UKFCET for permitting to do the work and STIC India for providing characterization results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest on work reported in this article.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tharayil, J.M., Manaf, A. Effect of different inorganic draw solutes on SiNPs-TFN membrane for forward osmosis desalination. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 289–298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03083-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03083-3