Skip to main content
Log in

Physicochemical properties of wastewater effluent from two selected wastewater treatment plants (Cape Town) for water quality improvement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is one of the main sources of pollution that seriously affect the physicochemical parameters in water bodies. This occurs particularly when partially treated or untreated effluent is released to various aquatic ecosystems. This constitutes a potential danger to the general environment. To safeguard the lives of human, aquatic and other living organisms, regular monitoring of wastewater effluent to ascertain their compliance with both national and international regulatory limits for water quality improvement is very crucial. This research work was carried out using standard methods to evaluate ten physicochemical parameters from the effluent of two WWTPs in Cape Town, South Africa. Our findings were: temperatures (16.90–25.33 °C), pH (5.85–7.85), EC (923.00–1294.17 µS/cm), TDS (590.72–828.27 mg/L), DO (1.30–5.50 mg/L), SO42− (3.23–163.18 mg/L), COD (23.70–898.58 mg/L), BOD (9.17–252.44 mg/L), Cl (48.17–378.48 mg/L) and PO43− (0.10–11.32 mg/L). Temperature, pH and SO42− levels in the two WWTPs were within the recommended limit for wastewater discharge by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF), South Africa and the United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). However, other parameters did not comply fully with both DWAF and USEPA standards. The result showed that effluents from these WWTPs are possible sources of pollution to the receiving water bodies and calls for enhancement of the WWTPs operations to ensure safe effluent discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott BW, Bishop K, Zarnetske JP, Minaudo C, Chapin FS, Krause S, Hannah DM et al (2019) Human domination of the global water cycle absent from depictions and perceptions. Nat Geosci 12(7):533–540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0374-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adewumi J, Ilemobade A, Van Zyl J (2010) Treated wastewater reuse in South Africa: overview, potential and challenges resources. Conserv Recycl 55:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agoro MA, Okoh OO, Adefisoye MA, Okoh AI (2018) Physicochemical properties of wastewater in three typical South African sewage works Polish. J Environ Stud 27:491–499. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/74156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aniyikaiye TE, Oluseyi T, Odiyo JO, Edokpayi JN (2019) Physico-chemical analysis of wastewater discharge from selected paint industries in Lagos. Nigeria 16(1235):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomain B (2020) Trump administration makes a Splash: the altered clean water act’s rippling effect on state and federal water regulation. Villanova Environ Law J 31(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-017-0176-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chigor VN, Sibanda T, Okoh AI (2013) Variations in the physicochemical characteristics of the Buffalo River in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Environ Monit Assess 185:8733–8747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3208-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DWAF W (2010) South African Water quality management series. Procedures to assess effluent discharge impacts. WRC Report No TT 64/94. Dept. Water Affairs For Water Res Commission, Pretoria, pp 1–42

  • Fatta-Kassinos D, Vasquez MI, Kümmerer K (2011) Transformation products of pharmaceuticals in surface waters and wastewater formed during photolysis and advanced oxidation processes–degradation, elucidation of byproducts and assessment of their biological potency. Chemosphere 85:693–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Srivastava V, Suorsa V, Sillanpää M (2018) Removal of Cd2+, Ni2+ and PO43− from aqueous solution by hydroxyapatite-bentonite clay-nanocellulose composite. Int J Biol Macromol 118:903–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iram S, Kanwal S, Ahmad I, Tabassam T, Suthar V, Mahmood-ul-Hassan M (2013) Assessment of physicochemical parameters of wastewater samples. Environ Monit Assess 185:2503–2515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2727-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kale S, Bandela N (2016) Study of physico-chemical parameters of waste water effluents from Waluj Industrial Area, Aurangabad. J Appl Chem 5:1307–1314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavitha R, Murthy VK, Makam R, Asith K (2012) Physico-chemical analysis of effluents from pharmaceutical industry and its efficiency study. Int J Eng Res Appl 2:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopaei NN, Abdollahi M (2017) Health risks associated with the pharmaceuticals in wastewater. J Pharm Sci 25:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-017-0176-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegel WW, Palmour III H (2012) Ceramics in severe environments. In: Proceedings of the Sixth University conference on ceramic science North Carolina State University at Raleigh, vol 5. Springer, pp 7–9

  • Lokhande RS, Singare PU, Pimple DS (2011) Study on Physico-chemical parameters of wastewater effluents from Taloja industrial area of Mumbai, India. Int J Ecosyst 1:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ije.20110101.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita RB, Fernandes SM, Rangel AO (2002) Turbidimetric determination of chloride in different types of water using a single sequential injection analysis system. J Environ Monit 4:458–461. https://doi.org/10.1039/b200456a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa SAB, Elferjani HS, Haroun FA, Abdelnabi FF (2009) Determination of available nitrate, phosphate and sulfate in soil samples. International Journal of PharmTech Research 1:598–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Olujimi O, Fatoki O, Odendaal J, Daso A (2012) Chemical monitoring and temporal variation in levels of endocrine disrupting chemicals (priority phenols and phthalate esters) from selected wastewater treatment plant and freshwater systems in Republic of South Africa. Microchem J 101:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.09.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osuolale O, Okoh A (2015) Assessment of the physicochemical qualities and prevalence of Escherichia coli and Vibrios in the final effluents of two wastewater treatment plants in South Africa: ecological and public health implications. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:13399–13412. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121013399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oyem H, Oyem I, Ezeweali D (2014) Temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids and chemical oxygen demand of groundwater in Boji-BojiAgbor/Owa area and immediate suburbs emperature Owa area and immediate suburbs. Res J Environ Sci 8:444–450. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2014.444.450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltahe A, Cornelius T, Wahabou A (2018) Study on physico-chemical parameters of wastewater effluents from cotton development plant of Maroua-Cameroon. J Pure Appl Chem Res 7(3):230–238. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpacr.2018.007.03.366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patil P, Sawant D, Deshmukh R (2012) Physico-chemical parameters for testing of water-A review. Int J Environ Sci 3(3):1194–1207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik P (2017) Handbook of environmental analysis: chemical pollutants in air, water, soil, and solid wastes. Crc Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan S, Pokhrel MR (2013) Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate in sugarcane juice, fertilizer, detergent and water samples by molybdenum blue method. Sci World 11:58–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasse C, Schlüsener MP, Schulz R, Ternes TA (2010) Antiviral drugs in wastewater and surface waters: a new class of pharmaceuticals of environmental relevance? Environ Sci Technol 44(5):1728–1735. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903216p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir I, Chhipa RC (2015) Comparative studies of some physicochemical characteristics of raw water and effluents of textile industries of Sitapura, Jaipur. Int J Adv Res 3(6):2444–2449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rana RS, Singh P, Kandari V, Singh R, Dobhal R, Sanjay G (2017) A review on characterization and bioremediation of pharmaceutical industries' wastewater: an Indian perspective. Appl Water Sci 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0225-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robins S (2019) ‘Day Zero’, hydraulic citizenship and the defence of the commons in Cape Town: A case study of the politics of water and its Infrastructures (2017–2018). J South Afr Stud 45(1):5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2019.1552424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusydi A (2018) Correlation between conductivity and total dissolved solid in various type of water: a review In IOP conference series. Earth Environ Sci 118:012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/118/1/012019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha AM, Neupane S, Bisht G (2017) An assessment of physicochemical parameters of selected industrial effluents in Nepal. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3659561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Dong HH (2016) Evaluation of the persistence of transformation products from ozonation of trace organic compounds—A critical review. Water Res 1(3):150–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikariha A, Sahu O (2014) Study of characteristics and treatments of dairy industry wastewater. J Appl Environ Microbiol 2:16–22. https://doi.org/10.12691/jaem-2-1-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah H, Khan N, Ali F, Khan A, Zeb I, Khan M (2018) Chemometric evaluation of heavy metals distribution in wastewater irrigated soil of peri-urban area. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:2519–2530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Drinking water regulations and health advisories, EPA 822-R-94–001

  • USEPA (1980) USEPA approved method for wastewater analyses (standard method 5220 D), vol 45

  • USEPA (2009) Sampling and analysis technical report for the targeted national sewage sludge survey Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (‘Technical Report’) 4301T: EPA-822-R-08–016

  • Veolia (2017) City of Cape Town. Bellville Wastewater Treatment Works, Western Cape. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood TP, Basson AE, Duvenage C, Rohwer ER (2016) The chlorination behaviour and environmental fate of the antiretroviral drug nevirapine in South African surface water. Water Res 104:349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabir A, Al Zaman M, Hossen MZ, Uddin MN, Biswas MJH, Asif AAl (2016) Impact of wastewater irrigation on major nutrient status in soil near Bhaluka industrial area of Bangladesh. Asian J Med Biol Res 2(1):131–137. https://doi.org/10.3329/ajmbr.v2i1.27578

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to appreciate the following establishments and institutions. Management and Staff of WWTPs 1 and 2 for permission to collect the samples. Department of Chemistry, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville Campus where the research is conducted and Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria for granting me the permission for the study at CPUT

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Somerset.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olabode, G.S., Olorundare, O.F. & Somerset, V.S. Physicochemical properties of wastewater effluent from two selected wastewater treatment plants (Cape Town) for water quality improvement. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 4745–4758 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02788-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02788-9

Keywords

Navigation