Abstract
The production of biochar is one of the new methods used in the recycling of organic wastes. The use of biochar may increase carbon storage in the soil for longer periods of time. In this study, carbon and nitrogen contents of different sizes of tomato harvest residue biochar (TB) produced at different temperatures and holding times were determined. TB produced at five different temperatures (300, 400, 500, 600, 700 °C) and three different durations (20, 40, and 80 min) was divided into three different grain size classes (< 0.5, 0.5–2, and 2–4 mm). Total carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) contents of each size class were examined. Production temperature significantly affected N contents of TB (p < 0.05) while changes in the C contents due to temperature were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, effect of TB size on C and N contents was statistically significant (p < 0.05). As TB grain size increases, BET surface area and total pore volume increased, while average pore radius decreased. The larger size of biochar (2–4 mm) demonstrated highly porous and honey-combed structures and contained both micro- and mesopores, which create a high specific surface area. It was suggested that the properties of biochar produced under the same conditions may vary according to their size and different sizes of biochar may be preferred according to the intended use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071
Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):202–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12037
Braida WJ, Pignatello JJ, Lu Y, Ravikovitch PI, Neimark AV, Xing B (2003) Sorption hysteresis of benzene in charcoal particles. Environ Sci Technol 37(2):409–417. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020660z
Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao X, Dugan B, Driver LE, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA (2014) New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenerg 66:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.059
Bruun EW, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ibrahim N, Egsgaard H, Ambus P, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K (2011) Influence of fast pyrolysis temperature on biochar labile fraction and short-term carbon loss in a loamy soil. Biomass Bioenerg 35(3):1182–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.008
Chia CH, Downie A, Munroe P (2015) Characteristics of biochar: physical and structural properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 121–142
Cybulak M, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P, Tomczyk A (2019) Influence of pH and grain size on physicochemical properties of biochar and released humic substances. Fuel 240:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.003
Das KC, Garcia-Perez M, Bibens B, Melear N (2008) Slow pyrolysis of poultry litter and pine woody biomass: impact of chars and bio-oils on microbial growth. J Environ Sci Health Part A 43(7):714–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520801959864
Demirbas A (2004) Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrol 72(2):243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2004.07.003
Di Blasi C, Tanzi V, Lanzetta M (1997) A study on the production of agricultural residues in Italy. Biomass Bioenerg 12(5):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(96)00073-6
Donne S (2011) Specific surface area and porosity measurements. In: Biochar: a guide to analysitical methods, pp 297–299
Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Routledge, pp 13–32
Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51(6):2061–2069. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25409
Głąb T, Palmowska J, Zaleski T, Gondek K (2016) Effect of biochar application on soil hydrological properties and physical quality of sandy soil. Geoderma 281:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.028
Guo Y, Rockstraw AD (2007) Physicochemical properties of carbons prepared from pecan shell by phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour Technol 98(8):1513–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.027
Guo Y, Yang S, Yu K, Zhao J, Wang Z, Xu H (2002) The preparation and mechanism studies of rice husk based porous carbon. Mater Chem Phys 74(3):320–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00473-4
He P, Liu Y, Shao L, Zhang H, Lü F (2018) Particle size dependence of the physicochemical properties of biochar. Chemosphere 212:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.106
He X, Yin H, Han L, Cui R, Fang C, Huang G (2019) Effects of biochar size and type on gaseous emissions during pig manure/wheat straw aerobic composting: insights into multivariate-microscale characterization and microbial mechanism. Biores Technol 271:375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.104
Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. J Environ Manag 92(1):223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.008
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (2014) Compendium of chemical terminology: gold book. http://goldbook.iupac.org/PDF/goldbook.pdf. Version 2.3.3
Jing F, Pan M, Chen J (2018) Kinetic and isothermal adsorption-desorption of PAEs on biochars: effect of biomass feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, and mechanism implication of desorption hysteresis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(12):11493–11504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1356-0
Kirsten WJ (1983) Organic elemental analysis. Academic Press, New York
Kołodyńska D, Wnętrzak R, Leahy JJ, Hayes MHB, Kwapiński W, Hubicki Z (2012) Kinetic and adsorptive characterization of biochar in metal ions removal. Chem Eng J 197:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.025
Lau AYT, Tsang DCW, Graham NJD, Ok YS, Yang X, Li X (2017) Surface-modified biochar in a bioretention system for Escherichia coli removal from stormwater. Chemosphere 169:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.048
Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) (2015) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge, Abingdon
Li Y, Zhang F, Yang M, Zhang J, Xie Y (2019) Impacts of biochar application rates and particle sizes on runoff and soil loss in small cultivated loess plots under simulated rainfall. Sci Total Environ 649:1403–1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.415
Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Barnes RT, Gallagher ME, Gonnermann H (2016) Impacts of biochar concentration and particle size on hydraulic conductivity and DOC leaching of biochar–sand mixtures. J Hydrol 533:461–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.007
Mašek O, Brownsort P, Cross A, Sohi S (2013) Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar. Fuel 103:151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.044
Memici (2018) Production of biochar from tomato harvest residues and determination of its effects on carbon dioxide emission in field condition. MSc thesis. Isparta University of Applied Sciences
Nartey OD, Zhao B (2014) Biochar preparation, characterization, and adsorptive capacity and its effect on bioavailability of contaminants: an overview. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/715398
Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Schomberg H (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 6:195–206
Peng XYLL, Ye LL, Wang CH, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature-and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res 112(2):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.01.002
Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Soil Res 48(7):516–525. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10058
Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 105. Academic Press, Berlin, pp 47–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9
Song W, Guo M (2012) Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrol 94:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.018
Trifunovic B, Gonzales HB, Ravi S, Sharratt BS, Mohanty SK (2018) Dynamic effects of biochar concentration and particle size on hydraulic properties of sand. Land Degrad Dev 29(4):884–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2906
Tsai WT, Liu SC, Chen HR, Chang YM, Tsai YL (2012) Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere 89(2):198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.085
TUIK (2018) Turkish Statistical Institute. Accessed 23 May 2018
Wang T, Stewart CE, Sun C, Wang Y, Zheng J (2018) Effects of biochar addition on evaporation in the five typical Loess Plateau soils. CATENA 162:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.013
Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Biores Technol 102(3):3488–3497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.018
Zhang J, Qun CHEN, Changfu YOU (2016) Biochar effect on water evaporation and hydraulic conductivity in sandy soil. Pedosphere 26(2):265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60041-8
Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1295–1301. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903140c
Acknowledgements
BET and SEM analyses were carried out at Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Science and Technology Application and Research Center (ÇOBİLTUM). This research was supported in part by a Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Suleyman Demirel University with Grant No. of 5072-S1-17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
İlay, R., Kavdır, Y., Memici, M. et al. Grain size-induced changes in carbon and nitrogen concentrations and characteristics of tomato harvest residue biochar. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 3917–3926 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02751-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02751-8