Skip to main content
Log in

The study of environmental and human factors affecting aquifer depth changes using tree algorithm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, more attention has been paid to water resources due to the development of agriculture and proper planning for better management of aquifers. Considering the effect of different factors on aquifer depth changes, in this study, human and environmental factors affecting the depth of aquifer changes in Qazvin plain were used. The Classification And Regression Tree (CART) algorithm was adopted to investigate and predict changes in aquifer depth. According to the results, the highest probability of the aquifer drop observed in July, August and September was 86.5%, and the highest probability of uprising aquifer depth arisen in December, January, February and March was 71.2%. According to sensitivity analysis by CART algorithm, the most important human and environmental factors affecting the number of aquifer depth changes in Qazvin plain were groundwater withdrawal from the agricultural abstraction well and the air temperature, respectively. Therefore, predicting the amount of aquifer depth changes by CART model, planning and managing groundwater resources is possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowski J, Chan HF (2011) A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J Hydrol 407(1–4):28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, vol 300, no 9, pp D05109

  • Bozkir AS, Sezer EA (2011) Predicting food demand in food courts by decision tree approaches. Proc Comput Sci 3:759–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and regression trees, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt CM (2007) Volumetric irrigation water pricing considerations. Irrigat Drain Syst 21(2):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattamvelli R (2011) Data mining algorithms, 1st edn. Alpha Science International, Oxford, pp 274–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Cichosz P (2015) Data mining algorithms: explained using R. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daud MNR, Corne DW (2007) Human readable rule induction in medical data mining: a survey of existing algorithms. In: WSEAS European computing conference, Athens, Greece

  • Dong D, Sun W, Zhu Z, Xi S, Lin G (2013) Groundwater risk assessment of the third aquifer in Tianjin city, China. Water Resour Manag 27(8):3179–3190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Seddawy AB, Sultan T, Khedr A (2013) Applying classification technique using DID3 algorithm to improve decision support under uncertain situations. Department of Business Information System, Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Department of Information System, Helwan University, Egypt. Int J Mod Eng Res 3(4):2139–2146

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng S, Huo Z, Kang S, Tang Z, Wang F (2011) Groundwater simulation using a numerical model under different water resources management scenarios in an arid region of China. Environ Earth Sci 62(5):961–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta GK (2011) Introduction to data mining with case studies, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 526–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2011) Data mining concepts and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, pp 365–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MM, Piantanakulchai M (2013) Groundwater arsenic contamination risk prediction using GIS and classification tree method. Eng Geol 156:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Lee CW (2015) Application of decision-tree model to groundwater productivity-potential mapping. Sustainability 7(10):13416–13432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley R, Casper MC, Hellebrand H, Merz R (2011) Catchment classification by runoff behaviour with self-organizing maps (SOM). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(9):2947–2962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Feng P, Zhang W, Zhang T (2013) An integrated groundwater management mode based on control indexes of groundwater quantity and level. Water Resour Manag 27(9):3273–3292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Yang C, Huang M, Wang D, Yoo C (2018) Modeling of subway indoor air quality using Gaussian process regression. J Hazard Mater 359:266–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loh WY (2011) Classification and regression trees. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 1(1):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran R, Khosa R (2013) Long term forecasting of groundwater levels with evidence of non-stationary and nonlinear characteristics. Comput Geosci 52:422–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantero P, Moser G, Serpico SB (2005) Partially supervised classification of remote sensing images through SVM-based probability density estimation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadrezapour O, Yoosefdoost I, Ebrahimi M (2019) Cuckoo optimization algorithm in optimal water allocation and crop planning under various weather conditions (case study: Qazvin plain, Iran). Neural Comput Appl 31(6):1879–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreaux M, Reynaud A (2006) Urban freshwater needs and spatial cost externalities for coastal aquifers: a theoretical approach. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(2):163–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C (2011) Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 13:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nampak H, Pradhan B, Manap MA (2014) Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation. J Hydrol 513:283–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DL, Delen D, Meng Y (2012) Comparative analysis of data mining methods for bankruptcy prediction. Decis Support Syst 52(2):464–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praveena SM, Abdullah MH, Bidin K, Aris AZ (2012) Sustainable groundwater management on the small island of Manukan, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 66(3):719–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinzio MD, Castellarin A, Toth E (2011) Data-driven catchment classification: application to the pub problem. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(6):1921–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MJ, Ganguli P (2012) Risk assessment of hydroclimatic variability on groundwater levels in the Manjara basin aquifer in India using Archimedean copulas. J Hydrol Eng 17(12):1345–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JA (1999) Remote sensing digital image analysis. Springer, Berlin, p 240

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Davraz A (2013) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 21(3):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpp C, Żurek AJ, Wachniew P, Gargini A, Gemitzi A, Filippini M, Witczak S (2016) A decision tree tool supporting the assessment of groundwater vulnerability. Environ Earth Sci 75(13):1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taormina R, Chau KW, Sethi R (2012) Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(8):1670–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui B, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Pradhan B, Chen W, Khosravi K, Panahi M, Ahmad B, Saro L (2018) Land subsidence susceptibility mapping in South Korea using machine learning algorithms. Sensors 18:2464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timofeev R (2004) Classification and regression trees (CART) theory and applications. Humboldt University, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth E (2013) Catchment classification based on characterisation of streamflow and precipitation time series. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(3):1149–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, He J, Chen H (2012) Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. Sci Total Environ 432:216–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeon YK, Han JG, Ryu KH (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using a decision tree. Eng Geol 116(3–4):274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Coordinatorship of the Scientific Research Projects of University Zabol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Haghighat jou.

Additional information

Communicated by Parveen Fatemeh Rupani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirhashemi, S.H., Haghighat jou, P., Mirzaei, F. et al. The study of environmental and human factors affecting aquifer depth changes using tree algorithm. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 1825–1834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02504-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02504-2

Keywords

Navigation