Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Waste management strategies for cleaner recycling of spent batteries: lead recovery and brick production from slag

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recycling of spent lead-acid batteries is leading to the production of slag which may be classified as hazardous waste because of its toxicity or lead (Pb) content. The leaching behavior of metals in the raw and solidification/stabilization (S/S) applied slag samples is evaluated with the toxicity characterization leaching procedure (TCLP). Then, TCLP results are compared to the threshold values given in USEPA Method 1311: 1992 and EU standard EN12457-4 2002 which suggest different pH values for TCLP. Raw slag sample were classified as hazardous waste according to USEPA and as non-hazardous according to EU-EN. The blocks which are produced by S/S applied slag with cement (slag ratio 25%—B25L and 50%—B50L) are classified as non-hazardous according to USEPA Method. However, the overall toxicity of blocks for B50L is classified as highly acute toxic (TU > 100 class 4). Therefore, B25L can be reused in the construction since it is not toxic and classified as high-quality concrete. It is suggested that appropriate waste management should be as follows: (1) spraying the acid solution to slag heap and collecting drained water in coagulation/flocculation tank, (2) recovery of lead (%3.3–4.0 Pb) and significant amount of iron (%18–25 Fe) from dried sludge and return to furnace and (3) S/S to slag for safer disposal to landfill or reuse of blocks as construction materials. Moreover, the results showed that toxicity test is a more convenient criterion to designate hazardous waste since it is directly reflecting the hazardous characteristics of waste.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(adapted by Talinli et al. 2016)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT) (2004) Solid wastes classification (Resíduos sólidos e classificação). NBR 10004

  • Bernardes AM, Espinosa DCR, Tenório JAS (2004) Recycling of batteries: a review of current processes and technologies. J Power Sources 130:291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bestgen JO, Cetin B, Tanyu BF (2016) Effects of extraction methods and factors on leaching of metals from recycled concrete aggregates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(13):12983–13002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TT, Dutrizac JE (1996) The mineralogical characterization of lead-acid battery paste. Hydrometallurgy 40:223–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JR, Hoeffner SL (1998) The history of stabilization/solidification technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 28(4):325–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coya B, Marañon E, Sastre B (2000) Ecotoxicity assessment of slag generated in the process of recycling lead from waste batteries. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(4):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coz A, Andrés A, Soriano S et al (2004) Environmental behavior of stabilized foundry sludge. J Hazard Mater 109:95–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis G, Medici F, Montereali M et al (2002) Reuse of residues arising from lead batteries recycles: a feasibility study. Waste Manag 22(8):925–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis TW, Mirza AH (2010) The refining of secondary lead for use in advanced lead-acid batteries. J Power Sources 195:4525–4529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EN12457-4 (2002) Characterization of waste-leaching-compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges—part 4: one stage batch test at a liquid to solid ratio of 10 l/kg for materials with particle size below 10 mm (without or with size reduction). European Standard ICS 13.030.10; 13.030.20

  • Farré M, García M, Tirapu L et al (2001) Wastewater toxicity screening of non-ionic surfactants by Toxalert and Microtox bioluminescence inhibition assays. Anal Chim Acta 427:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes GM, Mendes TF, Wada K (2011) Reduction in toxicity and generation of slag in secondary lead process. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):1096–1103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan U, Chegenizadeh A, Budihardjo MA et al (2016) Experimental evaluation of construction waste and ground granulated blast furnace slag as alternative soil stabilizers. Geotech Geol Eng 34(6):1707–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 11348-3 (2008) Water quality: determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent Bacteria Test) part 3: method using freeze-dried bacteria. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurado E, Fernández-Serrano M, Núñez Olea J et al (2012) Acute toxicity of alkylpolyglucosides to Vibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and microalgae: a comparative study. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 88(2):290–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malviya R, Chaudhary R (2006) Factors affecting hazardous waste solidification/stabilization: a review. J Hazard Mater 137(1):267–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantis I, Voutsa D, Samara C (2005) Assessment of the environmental hazard from municipal and industrial wastewater treatment sludge by employing chemical and biological methods. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 62(3):397–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf and Eddy (2004) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. Mc Graw Hill, New York, p 1818

    Google Scholar 

  • Musee N, Lorenzen L, Aldrich C (2008) A new methodology for hazardous waste classification using fuzzy set theory. Part I. Knowledge acquisition. J Hazard Mater 154:1040–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pablos MV, Fernández C, del Mar Babín M et al (2009) Use of a novel battery of bioassays for the biological characterization of hazardous wastes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72(5):1594–1600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandard P, Devillers J, Charissou AM et al (2006) Selecting a battery of bioassays for eco-toxicological characterization of wastes. Sci Total Environ 363:114–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radovanović DĐ, Kamberović ŽJ, Korać MS et al (2016) Solidified structure and leaching properties of metallurgical wastewater treatment sludge after solidification/stabilization process. J Environ Sci Health A 51(1):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall P, Chattopadhyay S (2004) Advances in encapsulation technologies for the management of mercury-contaminated hazardous wastes. J Hazard Mater B114:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rha CY, Kang SK, Kim CE (2000) Investigation of the stability of hardened slag paste for the stabilization/solidification of wastes containing heavy metal ions. J Hazard Mater 73:255–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sloot HA, Kosson DS (2012) Use of characterization leaching tests and associated modeling tools in assessing the hazardous nature of wastes. J Hazard Mater 207–208:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talinli I, Topuz E, Aydin E (2016) Waste management alternatives for hazardous waste lists. Eur Water 53:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Talınlı İ, Yamantürk R, Aydın E (2005) A rating system for determination of hazardous wastes. J Hazard Mater B126:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TS EN 206-1 (2002) Concrete-part 1: specification, performance, production and conformity. Turkish Standards Institution, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2014) Characteristics introduction and regulatory definitions, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, Washington, DC

  • USEPA Method 1311:1992. Toxicity characterization leaching procedure (TCLP). In: Response, office of solid waste and emergency. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, Washington, DC

  • Wilke BM, Riepert F, Koch C et al (2008) Eco toxicological characterization of hazardous wastes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 70:283–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Yang J, Wu X et al (2016) A critical review on secondary lead recycling technology and its prospect. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 61:108–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Li L, Sun X et al (2012) Preparation of basic lead oxide from spent lead acid battery paste via chemical conversion. Hydrometallurgy 117–118:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support of Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Project Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Topuz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: J Aravind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Topuz, E., Erkan, O.V. & Talınlı, I. Waste management strategies for cleaner recycling of spent batteries: lead recovery and brick production from slag. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 7901–7910 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02308-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02308-4

Keywords