Abstract
Sludge of tap water production was modified by iron nanoparticles via borohydride reduction in ferric chloride as an adsorbent for arsenic removal from contaminated water. Factors affecting the adsorption of As(III) and As(V) were studied. The maximum adsorption capacity was 24.2 and 35.7 mg/g for As(III) and As(V), respectively. The modified sludge with 10% (w/w) iron was effective for As(III) and As(V) removal from wastewater, surface water, and groundwater. The arsenic-contaminated sludge was stabilized/solidified using cement. The leaching study of arsenic by the dynamic monolithic leaching test (DMLT) showed that arsenic was mildly leached from the solidified adsorbent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Babatunde AO, Zhao YQ (2010) Equilibrium and kinetic analysis of phosphorus adsorption from aqueous solution using waste alum sludge. J Hazard Mater 184:746–752
Bhowmick S, Chakraborty S, Mondal P, Van Renterghem W, Van den Berghe S, Roman-Ross G, Chatterjee D, Iglesias M (2014) Montmorillonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron for removal of arsenic from aqueous solution: kinetics and mechanism. Chem Eng J 243:14–23
Chammui Y, Sooksamiti P, Naksata W, Thiansem S, Arqueropanyo OA (2014) Removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by adsorption on Leonardite. Chem Eng J 240:202–210
Du Q, Zhang S, Pan B, Lv L, Zhang W, Zhang Q (2013) Bifunctional resin-ZVI composites for effective removal of arsenite through simultaneous adsorption and oxidation. Water Res 47:6064–6074
European Committee for Standardization (2012) CEN/TS 15863-characterization of waste—leaching behaviour test for basic characterization—dynamic monolithic leaching test with periodic leachant renewal, under fixed test conditions
Falciglia PP, Cannata S, Romano S, Vagliasindi FGA (2014) Stabilisation/solidification of radionuclide polluted soils—part I: assessment of setting time, mechanical resistance, γ-radiation shielding and leachate γ-radiation. J Geochem Explor 142:104–111
Hossain I, Anjum N, Tasnim T (2016) Removal of arsenic from contaminated water utilizing tea waste. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:843–848
Jacukowicz-Sobala I, Ociński D, Kociołek-Balawejder E (2015) Iron and aluminium oxides containing industrial wastes as adsorbents of heavy metals: application possibilities and limitations. Waste Manag Res 33(7):612–629
Jain CK, Singh RD (2012) Technological options for the removal of arsenic with special reference to South East Asia. J Environ Manage 107:1–18
Kim YS, Kim DH, Yang JS, Baek K (2012) Adsorption characteristics of As(III) and As(V) on alum sludge from water purification facilities. Sep Sci Technol 47:2211–2217
Ko MS, Kim JY, Lee JS, Ko JI, Kim KW (2013) Arsenic immobilization in water and soil using acid mine drainage sludge. Appl Geochem 35:1–6
Korte NE, Fernando Q (1991) A review of arsenic (III) in groundwater. Crit Rev Env Contr 21:1–39
Luo S, Shen MN, Wang F, Zeng QR, Shao JH, Gu JD (2016) Synthesis of Fe3O4-loaded porous carbons developed from rice husk for removal of arsenate from aqueous solution. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:1137–1148
Ma J, Guo H, Lei M, Zhou X, Li F, Yu T, Wei R, Zhang H, Zhang X, Wu Y (2015) Arsenic adsorption and its fractions on aquifer sediment: effect of pH, arsenic species, and iron/manganese minerals. Water Air Soil Pollut 226(8):260
Mehta VS, Chaudhari SK (2015) Arsenic removal from simulated groundwater using household filter columns containing iron filings and sand. J Water Process Eng 6:151–157
Mosaferi M, Nemati S, Khataee A, Nasseri S, Hashemi AA (2014) Removal of arsenic (III, V) from aqueous solution by nanoscale zero-valent iron stabilized with starch and carboxymethyl cellulose. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12:1–11
Nakseedee P, Tanboonchuy V, Pimpha N, Khemthong P, Liao CH, Grisdanurak N (2015) Arsenic removal by nanoiron coupled with gas bubbling system. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 47:182–189
Ociński D, Jacukowicz-Sobala I, Kociołek-Balawejder E (2016a) Alginate beads containing water treatment residuals for arsenic removal from water-formation and adsorption studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(24):24527–24539
Ociński D, Jacukowicz-Sobala I, Mazur P, Raczyk J, Kociołek-Balawejder E (2016b) Water treatment residuals containing iron and manganese oxides for arsenic removal from water—characterization of physicochemical properties and adsorption studies. Chem Eng J 294:210–221
Ramos MAV, Yan W, Li XQ, Koel BE, Zhang WX (2009) Simultaneous oxidation and reduction of arsenic by zero-valent iron nanoparticles: understanding the significance of the core–shell structure. J Phys Chem C 113:14591–14594
Sharma AK, Kumar R, Mittal S, Hussain S, Arora M, Sharma RC, Babu JN (2015) In situ reductive regeneration of zerovalent iron nanoparticles immobilized on cellulose for atom efficient Cr(VI) adsorption. RSC Adv 5:89441–89446
Singh R, Singh S, Parihar P, Singh VP, Prasad SM (2015) Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 112:247–270
Sorlini S, Gialdini F (2012) Conventional oxidation treatments for the removal of arsenic with chlorine dioxide, hypochlorite, potassium permanganate and monochloramine. Water Res 44:5653–5659
Srechainate P (2013) Removal of arsenite, arsenate and dimethylarsenic acid from wastewater by sludge from tap water production. Master Thesis, Chulalongkorn University
Sullivan C, Tyrer M, Cheeseman CR, Graham NJ (2010) Disposal of water treatment wastes containing arsenic—a review. Sci Total Environ 408:1770–1778
Tchounwou PB, Udensi UK, Isokpehi RD, Yedjou CG, Kumar S (2015) Arsenic and cancer, handbook of arsenic toxicology. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, pp 533–555
Ungureanu G, Santos S, Boaventura R, Botelho C (2015) Arsenic and antimony in water and wastewater: overview of removal techniques with special reference to latest advances in adsorption. J Environ Manag 151:326–342
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1996) Stabilization/solidification processed for mixed waste, Washington, DC
Wang Y, Tsang DCW (2013) Effects of solution chemistry on arsenic(V) removal by low-cost adsorbents. J Environ Sci 25:2291–2298
Wang C, Luo H, Zhang Z, Wu Y, Zhang J, Chen S (2014) Removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions using nanoscale zero valent iron-reduced graphite oxide modified composites. J Hazard Mater 268:124–131
Wu K, Liu R, Li T, Liu H, Peng J, Qu J (2013) Removal of arsenic(III) from aqueous solution using a low-cost by-product in Fe-removal plants-Fe-based backwashing sludge. Chem Eng J 226:393–401
Yadav R, Sharma AK, Babu JN (2016) Sorptive removal of arsenite [As (III)] and arsenate [As (V)] by fuller’s earth immobilized nanoscale zero-valent iron nanoparticles (F-nZVI): effect of Fe0 loading on adsorption activity. J Environ Chem Eng 4:681–694
Yan W, Lien HL, Koel BE, Zhang WX (2013) Iron nanoparticles for environmental clean-up: recent developments and future outlook. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:63–77
Yoon IH, Moon DH, Kim KW, Lee KY, Lee JH, Kim MG (2010) Mechanism for the stabilization/solidification of arsenic-contaminated soils with Portland cement and cement kiln dust. J Environ Manag 91:2322–2328
Acknowledgment
In remembrance of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej (1927–2016), for his life-time dedication to Thailand. The success of this research can be attributed to the Environmental Analysis Research Unit and the Thai Stimulus Package 2. This work is financially supported by the National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), NSTDA, Ministry of Science and Technology, Thailand through its program of Center of Excellence Network.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarntanayoot, P., Fuangswasdi, S. & Imyim, A. Iron nanoparticle-modified water treatment residues for adsorption of As(III) and As(V) and their cement-based solidification/stabilization. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 4285–4292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2062-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2062-7