In-vehicle exposure of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and total volatile organic compounds from ethanol versus gasoline fuel

  • N. S. Alhajeri
  • F. M. Al-Fadhli
  • D. S. Alrukaibi
Original Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Alternative fuels, such as ethanol-based fuels (E85), have attracted attention as promising approaches for reducing emissions from on-road mobile sources. However, the in-vehicle exposure to pollutants when using E85 has not yet been addressed. This study aims to examine the contribution of E85 to in-vehicle exposure to carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) under different scenarios. A one-compartment mass-balance model incorporating outdoor concentration, infiltration, makeup and recirculated air exchange rate (λ), volume of the vehicle (V) and the internal emissions source (E) is developed to obtain the in-vehicle concentrations. The intake fraction (pollutant mass inhaled by an exposed individual per unit release of pollutant) was used to estimate the mass emission rate. The results show a small increase in interior CO and TVOC concentrations for vehicles fueled by E85 compared to those fueled by gasoline, mainly due to the increase in mass emission rate resulting from the exhaust system when E85 is burned. The in-vehicle concentration of CO and TVOCs for ethanol-fueled vehicles ranged from 6.2 to 42.2 mg/m3 (5.4–36.2 ppm) and from 67.9 to 1851 (µg/m3), respectively. The maximum increases in CO and TVOC concentrations were 2 (mg/m3) and 303.3 (µg/m3), observed when the air exchange rate was 2 h−1 and the vehicle was stationary. Despite the increase in CO and TVOC levels, the penetration of E85 positively impacted in-vehicle NO2 concentrations, with a maximum reduction of 293 (µg/m3). The study also developed a mathematical model to estimate the intake fraction under different scenarios for both E85 and gasoline fuels. The difference in intake fraction of CO is estimated to be in the range (2–1) (mg of pollution is inhaled per kg emitted). The difference in intake fraction of NO2 and TVOCs ranged from 10 to 2 and from 5 to 1, respectively.

Keywords

In-vehicle exposure Intake fraction Mass emissions rate E85 CO NO2 TVOC concentration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kuwait University for providing the facility to conduct this study.

References

  1. Alameddine I, Esber LA, Zeid EB, Hatzopoulou M, El-Fadel M (2016) Operational and environmental determinants of in-vehicle CO and PM 2.5 exposure. Sci Total Environ 551:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygiene (ACGIH) (1994) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices for 1994–1995. In: American conference of governmental industrial hygiene, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  3. ASHRAE (2010) Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62–1 2007. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc., AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaloulakou A, Mavroidis I (2002) Comparison of indoor and outdoor concentrations of CO at a public school. Evaluation of an indoor air quality model. Atmos Environ 36(11):1769–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan AT (2003) Commuter exposure and indoor–outdoor relationships of carbon oxides in buses in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 37(27):3809–3815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan L, Liu Y (2001) Carbon monoxide levels in popular passenger commuting modes traversing major commuting routes in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 35(15):2637–2646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan CC, Ozkaynak H, Spengler JD, Sheldon L (1991) Driver exposure to volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, ozone and nitrogen dioxide under different driving conditions. Environ Sci Technol 25(5):964–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan L, Liu Y, Lee S, Chan C (2002) Carbon monoxide levels measured in major commuting corridors covering different landuse and roadway microenvironments in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 36(2):255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chao CY (2001) Comparison between indoor and outdoor air contaminant levels in residential buildings from passive sampler study. Build Environ 36(9):999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clifford M, Clarke R, Riffat S (1997) Drivers’ exposure to carbon monoxide in Nottingham, UK. Atmos Environ 31(7):1003–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dockery DW, Spengler JD (1981) Indoor-outdoor relationships of respirable sulfates and particles. Atmos Environ (1967) 15(3):335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duci A, Chaloulakou A, Spyrellis N (2003) Exposure to carbon monoxide in the Athens urban area during commuting. Sci Total Environ 309(1):47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ekberg LE (1994) Outdoor air contaminants and indoor air quality under transient conditions. Indoor Air 4(3):189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Fadel M, Abi-Esber L (2009) In-vehicle exposure to carbon monoxide emissions from vehicular exhaust: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39(8):585–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esber LA, El-Fadel M, Nuwayhid I, Saliba N (2007) The effect of different ventilation modes on in-vehicle carbon monoxide exposure. Atmos Environ 41(17):3644–3657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Esmen NA (1978) Characterization of contaminant concentrations in enclosed spaces. Environ Sci Technol 12(3):337–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fletcher B, Saunders C (1994) Air change rates in stationary and moving motor vehicles. J Hazard Mater 38(2):243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ginnebaugh DL, Liang J, Jacobson MZ (2010) Examining the temperature dependence of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline emissions on air pollution with a largely-explicit chemical mechanism. Atmos Environ 44(9):1192–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes S (1989) Estimating the effect of being indoors on total personal exposure to outdoor air pollution. JAPCA 39(11):1453–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes S (1991) Use of an indoor air quality model (IAQM) to estimate indoor ozone levels. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 41(2):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Health Canada (2016) Exposure guidelines for residential indoor air quality. Environmental and Workplace Health, Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/air-quality/residential-indoor-air-quality-guidelines.html. Accessed Jan 2017
  22. Heinsohn P, Jewett DL (1993) Exposure to blood-containing aerosols in the operating room: a preliminary study. Am Ind Hygiene Assoc J 54(8):446–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humbert S, Marshall JD, Shaked S, Spadaro JV, Nishioka Y, Preiss P et al (2011) Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45(11):4808–4816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishizu Y (1980) General equation for the estimation of indoor pollution. Environ Sci Technol 14(10):1254–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobson MZ (2007) Effects of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline vehicles on cancer and mortality in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 41(11):4150–4157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joodatnia P, Kumar P, Robins A (2013) Fast response sequential measurements and modelling of nanoparticles inside and outside a car cabin. Atmos Environ 71:364–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim KH, Szulejko JE, Jo HJ, Lee MH, Kim YH, Kwon E, Ma CJ, Kumar P (2016) Measurements of major VOCs released into the closed cabin environment of different automobiles under various engine and ventilation scenarios. Environ Pollut 215:340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klepeis NE (1999) An introduction to the indirect exposure assessment approach: modeling human exposure using microenvironmental measurements and the recent National Human Activity Pattern Survey. Environ Health Perspect 107(Suppl 2):365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P et al (2001) The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 11(3):231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kraenzmer M (1999) Modeling and continuous monitoring of indoor air pollutants for identification of sources and sinks. Environ Int 25(5):541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lai AC, Thatcher TL, Nazaroff WW (2000) Inhalation transfer factors for air pollution health risk assessment. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50(9):1688–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lavigne A, Powers SE (2007) Evaluating fuel ethanol feedstocks from energy policy perspectives: A comparative energy assessment of corn and corn stover. Energy Policy 35(11):5918–5930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leech J, Wilby K, McMullen E, Laporte K (1995) The Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey: report of methods and population surveyed. Chronic Dis Can 17(3–4):118–123Google Scholar
  34. Li T-T, Bai Y-H, Liu Z-R, Liu J-F, Zhang G-S, Li J-L (2006) Air quality in passenger cars of the ground railway transit system in Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 367(1):89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall JD, Teoh S-K, Nazaroff WW (2005) Intake fraction of nonreactive vehicle emissions in US urban areas. Atmos Environ 39(7):1363–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nazaroff WW (2008) Inhalation intake fraction of pollutants from episodic indoor emissions. Build Environ 43(3):269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. OEHHA (1996) Technical support document for exposure assessment and stochastic analysis, California Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment. http://www.oehha.org/airhot_spots/finalStoc.html. Accessed Apr 2006
  38. Ott W, Switzer P, Willits N (1994) Carbon monoxide exposures inside an automobile traveling on an urban arterial highway. Air Waste 44(8):1012–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ott W, Klepeis N, Switzer P (2008) Air change rates of motor vehicles and in-vehicle pollutant concentrations from secondhand smoke. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 18(3):312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Park J-H, Spengler JD, Yoon D-W, Dumyahn T, Lee K, Ozkaynak H (1998) Measurement of air exchange rate of stationary vehicles and estimation of in-vehicle exposure. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 8(1):65–78Google Scholar
  41. Rosenbaum RK, Margni M, Jolliet O (2007) A flexible matrix algebra framework for the multimedia multipathway modeling of emission to impacts. Environ Int 33(5):624–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shair FH, Heitner KL (1974) Theoretical model for relating indoor pollutant concentrations to those outside. Environ Sci Technol 8(5):444–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spengler J, Schwab M, Ryan PB, Colome S, Wilson AL, Billick I, Becker E (1994) Personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide in the Los Angeles Basin. Air Waste 44(1):39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullivan JB Jr, Krieger GB, Thomas RJ (1992) Hazardous materials toxicology: clinical principles of environmental health. J Occup Environ Med 34(4):365–371Google Scholar
  45. The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme (1999). Carbon monoxide, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  46. The Kuwait Envieonment Public Authority (KEPA) (2015) Air quality monitoring department. Air quality monitoring stations data. https://www.epa.org.kw/department.php?id=14. Accessed June 2016
  47. The United States Department of Energy (U.S. DoE) (2017) Energy efficiency and renewable energy. Alternative Fuels Data Center. Ethanol (E85). https://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels/ethanol_e85.html. Accessed Apr 2017
  48. The United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2002) Carbon monoxide poisoning. OSHA Factsheet. U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Safety and Health Association, Washington, DC. https://www.osha.gov/pls/publications/publication.athruz?pType=Industry&pID=30. Accessed Nov 2016
  49. The United States Envioenmntal Protection Aganacy (U.S. EPA) (2017) Volatile organic compounds’ impact on indoor air quality, indoor air quality (IAQ). https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/volatile-organic-compounds-impact-indoor-air-quality. Accessed May 2017
  50. Zhai H, Frey HC, Rouphail NM, Gonçalves GA, Farias TL (2009) Comparison of flexible fuel vehicle and life-cycle fuel consumption and emissions of selected pollutants and greenhouse gases for ethanol 85 versus gasoline. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59(8):912–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. S. Alhajeri
    • 1
  • F. M. Al-Fadhli
    • 2
  • D. S. Alrukaibi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Technology Management, College of Life SciencesKuwait UniversitySafatKuwait
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringKuwait UniversitySafatKuwait
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringKuwait UniversitySafatKuwait

Personalised recommendations