Increasing the utilization potential of fly ashes from fluidized bed combustion by mechanical treatments

  • K. OhenojaEmail author
  • M. Körkkö
  • V. Wigren
  • J. Österbacka
  • M. Illikainen
Original Paper


The increasing use of biomasses in the production of electricity and heat delivers an increased amount burning residue, fly ash that disposal is becoming more and more restricted and expensive. Therefore, there is a great interest to utilize fly ash in other means than disposal. This study aimed to determine the suitability of air jet sieving and air classification to separate detrimental elements, such as sulfate, chloride and some heavy metals, into fine fractions. Furthermore, the effect of fly ash deagglomeration on classification selectivity was studied. Experiments were conducted using two fly ash samples originated from fluidized bed combustion of peat, forest residues and wastes. The results showed that it is possible to significantly improve the utilization potential of fly ashes using air jet classification. In classification, calcium is concentrated into a fine fraction and silica and aluminum are concentrated in coarse fractions. Sulfate, chloride and studied detrimental metals (cadmium, copper, lead and zinc) enrich to the fine fraction with high selectivity. Deagglomeration had a minor effect, as it slightly improved the classification selectivity for some elements.


Bioenergy Fractionating Grinding Processing Sieving Sustainability 



This study was supported by the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation and the following Finnish companies: Boliden Harjavalta Oy, Ekokem Palvelu Oy, Fortum Power and Heat Oy, Helen Oy, Jyväskylän Energia Oy, Kemira Chemicals Oy, Metsä Board Oyj, Napapiirin Energia ja Vesi Oy, Nordkalk Oy Ab, Paroc Group Oy, SSAB Europe Oy, Stora Enso Oyj, UPM-Kymmene Oyj and Valmet Technologies Oy. We would like to thank Mr. Jarno Karvonen and Mr. Jani Österlund for their contributions to the laboratory work.


  1. Budhathoki R, Väisänen A (2016) Particle size based recovery of phosphorus from combined peat and wood fly ash for forest fertilization. Fuel Process Technol 146:85–89. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Camerani MC, Steenari B-M, Sharma R, Beckett R (2002) Cd speciation in biomass fly ash particles after size separation by centrifugal SPLITT. Fuel 81:1739–1753. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chindaprasirt P, Homwuttiwong S, Sirivivatnanon V (2004) Influence of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage and sulfate resistance of blended cement mortar. Cem Concr Res 34:1087–1092. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahl O, Nurmesniemi H, Pöykiö R, Watkins G (2009) Comparison of the characteristics of bottom ash and fly ash from a medium-size (32 MW) municipal district heating plant incinerating forest residues and peat in a fluidized-bed boiler. Fuel Process Technol 90:871–878. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davison RL, Natusch DFS, Wallace JR, Evans CA (1974) Trace elements in fly ash. Dependence of concentration on particle size. Environ Sci Technol 8:1107–1113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. du Erdo K, Türker P (1998) Effects of fly ash particle size on strength of portland cement fly ash mortars. Cem Concr Res 28:1217–1222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EN 450-1 (2012) SFS-EN 450-1 Fly ash for concrete. Definition, specifications and conformity criteriaGoogle Scholar
  8. European Union (2009) Directive 2009/28. Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealingGoogle Scholar
  9. Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2011) Decree of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry on Fertiliser Products 24/11 (in Finnish)Google Scholar
  10. Finnish Ministry of the Environment (2009) Government Decree amending the annexes to the Government Decree on the utilization of certain wastes in the earth constructionGoogle Scholar
  11. Hautala J, Niinimäki J, Jokinen H et al (2009) Screening and cleaning. In: Lönnberg B (ed) Mechanical pulping, 2nd edn. Finnish Paper Engineers’ Association, Helsinki, pp 282–326Google Scholar
  12. Illikainen M, Tanskanen P, Kinnunen P et al (2014) Reactivity and self-hardening of fly ash from the fluidized bed combustion of wood and peat. Fuel 135:69–75. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingerslev M, Skov S, Sevel L, Pedersen LB (2011) Element budgets of forest biomass combustion and ash fertilisation—a Danish case-study. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2697–2704. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Itskos G, Itskos S, Koukouzas N (2010) Size fraction characterization of highly-calcareous fly ash. Fuel Process Technol 91:1558–1563. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karnis A (1997) Pulp fractionation by fibre characteristics. Pap Timber 79:480–488Google Scholar
  16. Körkkö M (2012) On the analysis of ink content in recycled pulps. Ph.D. thesis, University of OuluGoogle Scholar
  17. Korpijärvi K, Mroueh U-M, Merta E et al (2009) Energiantuotannon tuhkien jalostaminen maarakennuskäyttöön. VTT, EspooGoogle Scholar
  18. Lanzerstorfer C (2015a) Air classification: potential treatment method for optimized recycling or utilization of fine-grained air pollution control residues obtained from dry off-gas cleaning high-temperature processing systems. Waste Manag Res 33:1041–1044. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lanzerstorfer C (2015b) Investigation of the contamination of a fly ash sample during sample preparation by air classification. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1437–1442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manskinen K (2013) Utilisation aspects of ashes and green liquor dregs from an integrated semichemical pulp and board mill. Ph.D. thesis, Aalto UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Narodoslawsky M, Obernberger I (1996) From waste to raw material—the route from biomass to wood ash for cadmium and other heavy metals. J Hazard Mater 50:157–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson G (1981) The screening quotient: a better index for screening performance. Tappi 64:133–134Google Scholar
  23. Obernberger I, Biedermann F, Widmann W, Riedl R (1997) Concentrations of inorganic elements in biomass fuels and recovery in the different ash fractions. Biomass Bioenergy 12:211–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohenoja K, Tanskanen P, Peltosaari O et al (2016a) Effect of particle size distribution on the self-hardening property of biomass-peat fly ash from a bubbling fluidized bed combustion. Fuel Process Technol 148:60–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ohenoja K, Tanskanen P, Wigren V et al (2016b) Self-hardening of fly ashes from a bubbling fluidized bed combustion of peat, forest industry residuals, and wastes. Fuel. Google Scholar
  26. Ohenoja K, Körkkö M, Wigren V et al (2018) Fly ash classification efficiency of electrostatic precipitators in fluidized bed combustion of peat, wood, and forest residues. J Environ Manag 206:607–614. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orava H, Nordman T, Kuopanportti H (2006) Increase the utilisation of fly ash with electrostatic precipitation. Miner Eng 19:1596–1602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patel A, Basu P, Acharya B (2017) An investigation into partial capture of CO2 released from a large coal/petcoke fired circulating fluidized bed boiler with limestone injection using its fly and bottom ash. J Environ Chem Eng 5:667–678. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pedersen AJ (2003) Characterization and electrodialytic treatment of wood combustion fly ash for the removal of cadmium. Biomass Bioenergy 25:447–458. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rajamma R, Ball R, Tarelho L et al (2009) Characterisation and use of biomass fly ash in cement-based materials. J Hazard Mater 172:1049–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rajamma R, Senff L, Ribeiro MJ et al (2015) Biomass fly ash effect on fresh and hardened state properties of cement based materials. Compos Part B Eng 77:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salman AD, Ghadiri M, Hounslow MJ (2007) Handbook of powder technology. Particle breakage, vol 12. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Method 3051A: microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils, part of test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. Accessed 19 Dec 2016
  34. Van de Velden M, Dewil R, Baeyens J et al (2008) The distribution of heavy metals during fluidized bed combustion of sludge (FBSC). J Hazard Mater 151:96–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Eijk RJ, Obernberger I, Supancic K (2012) Options for increased utilization of ash from biomass combustion and co-firing, vol 32. IEA Bioenergy Task, ArnhemGoogle Scholar
  36. wietlik R, Trojanowska M, Jóźwiak MA (2012) Evaluation of the distribution of heavy metals and their chemical forms in ESP-fractions of fly ash. Fuel Process Technol 95:109–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yliniemi J, Pesonen J, Tiainen M, Illikainen M (2015) Alkali activation of recovered fuel–biofuel fly ash from fluidised-bed combustion: stabilisation/solidification of heavy metals. Waste Manag 43:273–282. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang T-S, Yu Q-J, Wei J-X, Zhang P-P (2011) Effect of size fraction on composition and pozzolanic activity of high calcium fly ash. Adv Cem Res 23:299–307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fibre and Particle Engineering Research Unit, Faculty of TechnologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Haarla OyTampereFinland
  3. 3.Renotech OyTurkuFinland
  4. 4.Fortum Waste Solutions OyRiihimäkiFinland

Personalised recommendations