Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pollution potential of the wastes of used oil treatment plants and their possible remediation techniques

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, wastes of used oil treatment plants have been studied for their pollution potential and geotechnical characteristics. A random sampling plan was used to collect 11 samples from the dump site. Moreover, statistical analysis indicated that six samples were required to prepare a representative sample for the wastes. Thus, a mixed sample was prepared to determine moisture content, pH, Atterberg limits and density of the waste. The analysis of organic compounds and heavy metals showed the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and Barium as the main pollutants. The results also showed waste as a fine-grained soil heavily contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons. The mean concentration of TPH was more than 216 g/kg, which is 832, 108 and 433 times greater than the acceptable cleanup levels for diesel range organics, oil range organics and TPH, respectively. Nevertheless, heavy metals concentrations are lower than proposed cleanup levels for industrial area. The moisture content, pH, liquid limit, plastic limit, plastic index and density of the mixed sample were 12.26%, 9.6, 25.91, 15.83, 10.08 and 1.22 g/cm3, respectively. After that, several remediation techniques were evaluated to propose the best one based on the physical and chemical properties of the waste, the applicability of the method and implementation costs. Finally, solidification/stabilization technique using organophilic clay as the stabilizer, incineration and bioremediation techniques was recommended for cleanup of the site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiri A, Ghanbarzadeh M, Ghorban A (2011). Recycling of used oil in Iran and compare it with the new environmental techniques. In: 5th national conference and exhibition on environmental engineering. Tehran, Iran 20–21 November. University of Tehran, Environmental Faculty. http://www.civilica.com/Paper-CEE05-CEE05_320.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Araruna JT, Portes VLO, Soares APL, Silva MG, Sthel MS, Schramm DU, Tibana S, Vargas H (2004) Oil spills debris clean up by thermal desorption. J Hazard Mater 110(1):161–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arizona Secretary of State (2004) Title 18, Environmental quality. Department of environmental quality, remedial action, chapter 7

  • Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) (2016) Hazardous waste division, guidance screening levels for total petroleum hydrocarbons. http://www2.adeq.state.ar.us/hazwaste/branch_tech/risk_assessment.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Ball AS, Stewart RJ, Schliephake K (2012) A review of the current options for the treatment and safe disposal of drill cuttings. Waste Manag Res 30(5):457–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DL, Laderach SR, Showers C (2002) Treatment of petroleum contaminated soil in cold, wet, remote regions. United States department of agriculture, Forest service, technology and development program

  • Beyer WH (1987) CRC standard mathematical tables, 28th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 536–571

    Google Scholar 

  • California Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Use of California human health screening levels (CHHSLs) in evaluation of contaminated properties

  • Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2008) Canada-Wide standard for petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) in soil. Table 5.2

  • Cuypers C, Pancras T, Grotenhuis T, Rulkens W (2002) The estimation of PAH bioavailability in contaminated sediments using hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and Triton X-100 extraction techniques. Chemosphere 46(8):1235–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva LJ, Alves FC, de França FP (2012) A review of the technological solutions for the treatment of oily sludges from petroleum refineries. Waste Manag Res 30(10):1016–1030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Division of Waste Management (DWM) program rules (2005) Groundwater and surface water cleanup target levels. Florida, Table 1

  • Dong ZY, Huang WH, Xing DF, Zhang HF (2013) Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the integration of electrokinetics and biostimulation. J Hazard Mater 260:399–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ershadi L, Ebadi T, Ershadi V, Rabbani AR (2011) Chemical oxidation of crude oil in oil contaminated soil by Fenton process using nano zero valent Iron. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on environmental science and technology, Singapore, pp 26–28

  • Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR) (1994) Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide. v.4.0. http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/top_page.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Hamawand I, Yusaf T, Rafat S (2013) Recycling of waste engine oils using a new washing agent. Energies 6(2):1023–1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • https://www.epa.gov/hw/special-wastes#crude. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Iturbe R, López J (2015) Bioremediation for a soil contaminated with hydrocarbons. J Petrol Environ Biotechnol 6(2):1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kajdas C (2000) Major pathways for used oil disposal and recycling. Part 1. Lubr Sci 7(1):61–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi D, Soroush M (2008) Acid sludge characteristics of used oil treatment plants and its methods of removal, disposal and recycling. In: 2nd national conference and exhibition on environmental engineering. Tehran, Iran 20–21 May, University of Tehran. http://www.civilica.com/Paper-CEE02-CEE02_425.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Khalladi R, Benhabiles O, Bentahar F, Moulai-Mostefa N (2009) Surfactant remediation of diesel fuel polluted soil. J Hazard Mater 164(2):1179–1184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kriipsalu M, Nammari D (2010) Monitoring of biopile composting of oily sludge. Waste Manag Res 28(5):395–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JK, Park D, Kim BU, Dong JI, Lee S (1998) Remediation of petroleum-contaminated soils by fluidized thermal desorption. Waste Manag 18(6):503–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) (2003) Screening option and screening standards for soil and groundwater. RECAP Table 2

  • Lund HF (1992) The McGraw-hill recycling handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, Yu J (2015) Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: a review. J Hazard Mater 285:419–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi Z, Ghorbani A (2011) Environmental damage caused by oil re-refining waste disposal unit and provide appropriate solutions. In: 5th national conference and exhibition on environmental engineering. Tehran, Iran 20–21 November, University of Tehran, Environmental Faculty. http://www.civilica.com/Paper-CEE05-CEE05_068.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Mohebbi M, Gitipour S, Madadian E (2013) Solidification/stabilization of cresol-contaminated soil: mechanical and leaching behavior. Soil Sediment Contam Int J 22(7):783–799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mortier RM, Orszulik ST (eds) (2010) Chemistry and technology of lubricants, vol 107115. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NDEC) and New York State Department of Health (NDH) (2006) Final human health-based soil cleanup objectives. Table 5.6-1

  • Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (2012) Risk-based levels for total petroleum hydrocarbons

  • Oliveira FJS, da Rocha Calixto RO, Felippe CEC, de Franca FP (2013) Waste management and contaminated site remediation practices after oil spill: a case study. Waste Manag Res 31(12):1190–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D, Fann S, Wight S (1998) Application guide for thermal desorption systems (No. NFESC-TR-2090-ENV). Naval facilities engineering service center port Hueneme CA

  • Pichtel J (2005) Waste management practices: municipal, hazardous, and industrial. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard SJ, Hrudey SE, Fedorak PM (1994) Bioremediation of petroleum-and creosote-contaminated soils: a review of constraints. Waste Manag Res 12(2):173–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potter TL, Simmons KE (1998) Composition of petroleum mixtures. Total petroleum hydrocarbon criteria working group series

  • Sandu C, Popescu M, Rosales E, Pazos M, Lazar G, Sanromán MA (2017) Electrokinetic oxidant soil flushing: a solution for in situ remediation of hydrocarbons polluted soils. J Electroanal Chem 799:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shri Kannan C, Mohan Kumar KS, Sakeer Hussain M, Deepa Priya N, Saravanan K (2014) Studies on reuse of re-refined used automotive lubricating oil. Res J Eng Sci 3(6):8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard, A.S.T.M., D422-63 e2 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils (Withdrawn 2016). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D422. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Standard A.S.T.M., D7678-11 (2011) Standard Test Method for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) in Water and Wastewater with Solvent Extraction using Mid-IR Laser Spectroscopy. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D7678. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Standard A.S.T.M., D854-14 (2014) Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D854. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • Standard A.S.T.M., D4318-17 (2017) Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D4318. Accessed 15 Oct 2015

  • State of Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (2013) Remediation standard. Appendix A to sections 22a-133k-1 through 22a-133k-3

  • State of Maryland Department of the Environmental (SMDE) (2008) Cleanup standard for soil and groundwater

  • United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002) Technical guidelines on used oil re-refining or other re-uses of previously used oil. Secretariat of the Basel Convention International Environment House, No. 5

  • USEPA (1979) Manual entitled “Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes”

  • USEPA (1986) Method 8100, Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1989) Stabilization/solidification of CERCLA and RCRA wastes, physical tests, chemical testing procedure, technology screening, and field activities. EPA/625/6-89/022. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

  • USEPA (1994) Test methods for evaluating solid waste, Physical/chemical methods (SW-846). Revision 2, Chapter 9, sampling plan. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

  • USEPA (1996a) Method 3050B, Acid digestion of sediments, sludge, and soils. Revision 2. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

  • USEPA (1996b) Method 3600C, cleanup. Revision 3. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

  • USEPA (1996c) Method 3630C, Silica gel cleanup. Revision 3. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

  • Washington State Department of Ecology (2001) Soil cleanup levels for unrestricted land use. Table 1: Quick summary-basis for method A, Table 740-1

  • Yeung AT, Gu YY (2011) A review on techniques to enhance electrochemical remediation of contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 195:11–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zakharchenko AV, Korzhov YV, Lapshina ED, Kul’kov MG, Yarkov DM, Khoroshev DI (2011) Remediation of oil-contaminated soil using the CLEANSOIL technology. Eurasian Soil Sci 44(4):453–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this research highly acknowledge the Kaharazmi University for the laboratory analysis in the civil engineering department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

    M. T. Jebeli & N. Heidarzadeh

  2. Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    S. Gitipour

Authors
  1. M. T. Jebeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Heidarzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Gitipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Heidarzadeh.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jebeli, M.T., Heidarzadeh, N. & Gitipour, S. Pollution potential of the wastes of used oil treatment plants and their possible remediation techniques. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 3565–3578 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1780-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1780-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation