Plasmon resonance-enhanced internal reflection ellipsometry for the trace detection of mercuric ion

  • M. O. Caglayan
Original Paper


Mercuric ion in aqueous media is extremely toxic to the environment and organisms. Surface plasmon resonance-based optical sensors have been reported that can detect low concentrations as low as fg analytes per cm2 of the sensor surface. Moreover, the ellipsometry, which detects the changes in polarization states of reflected light from the sensor surface, can be combined with SPR technique to figure out the changes in dielectric media beneath the sensor surface. In this paper, this technique called as surface plasmon resonance-enhanced total internal reflection was used to make trace monitoring of mercuric ion in aqueous media. A protein and an aptamer-based biosensor were developed for this purpose. Bovine serum albumin and mercury-specific aptamer were immobilized on sensor chip via self-assembly routes. The limit of detection was 40.7 nM Hg2+ for protein sensor and 26 pM Hg2+ for anti-Hg aptamer-based sensor. The selectivity of the protein sensor was lower than anti-Hg aptamer sensor when Pb2+ ion was used as the competent ion.


Surface plasmon resonance Total internal reflection Aptamers Ellipsometry Heavy metal detection 



This study is supported by Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects (CUBAP) with Grant Number M482. The main concept of this study partly overlaps with the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) Project MAG-112M563. Author thanks both the institutions for their support.


  1. Aragoni MC, Area M, Demartin F et al (2002) Fluorometric chemosensors. Interaction of toxic heavy metal ions PbII, CdII, and HgII with novel mixed-donor phenanthroline-containing macrocycles: spectrofluorometric, conductometric, and crystallographic studies. Inorg Chem 41:6623–6643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arakawa T, Miwa S (1996) Selective gas detection by means of surface plasmon resonance sensors. Thin Solid Films 282:466–468Google Scholar
  3. Asasian A, Kaghazchi T (2015) Sulfurized activated carbons and their mercury adsorption/desorption behavior in aqueous phase. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:2511–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batayneh AT (2012) Toxic (aluminum, beryllium, boron, chromium and zinc) in groundwater: health risk assessment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caglayan MO, Sayar F, Demirel G, Garipcan B, Otman B, Celen B, Piskin E (2009) Stepwise formation approach to improve ellipsometric biosensor response. Nanomedicine 5:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chah S, Yi J, Zare RN (2004) Surface plasmon resonance analysis of aqueous mercuric ions. Sens Actuators B 99:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demirel G, Caglayan MO, Garipcan B, Duman M, Piskin E (2007) Oriented immobilization of IgG on hydroxylated Si(001) surfaces via protein-a by a multiple-step process based on a self-assembly approach. J Mater Sci 42:9402–9408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demirel G, Caglayan MO, Garipcan B, Piskin E (2008) A novel DNA biosensor based on ellipsometry. Surf Sci 602:952–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dikinya O, Areola O (2010) Comparative analysis of heavy metal concentration in secondary treated wastewater irrigated soils cultivated by different crops. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding X, Kong L, Wang J, Fang F, Li D, Liu J (2013) Highly sensitive SERS detection of Hg2+ ions in aqueous media using gold nanoparticles/graphene heterojunctions. Appl Mater Interfaces 5:7072–7078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gbaruko BC, Friday OV (2007) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in some fauna and flora. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanumegowda NM, White IM, Fan X (2006) Aqueous mercuric ion detection with microsphere optical ring resonator sensors. Sens Actuators B 120:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim Y, Johnson RC, Hupp JT (2001) Gold nanoparticle-based sensing of “Spectroscopically silent” heavy metal ions. Nano Lett 1:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kretschmann E, Raether H (1968) Radiative decay of non-radiative surface plasmons excited by light. Z Naturforsch 23a:2135–2136Google Scholar
  15. Li Q, Zhou X, Xing D (2010) Rapid and highly sensitive detection of mercury ion (Hg2+) by magnetic beads-based electrochemiluminescence assay. Biosens Bioelectron 26:859–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mehdinia A, Basiri S, Jabbari A (2016) A novel label-free method for determination of inorganic mercury in environmental aqueous media using BSA-modified silver nanoparticles. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:2663–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mrksich M, Whitesides GM (1996) Using self-assembled monolayers to understand the interactions of manmade surfaces with proteins and cells. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 25:55–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olayan AH, Thomas BV (2014) Assessment of the ultra-trace mercury levels in selected desert plants. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:1413–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poksinski M, Arwin H (2003) In situ monitoring of metal surfaces exposed to milk using total internal reflection ellipsometry. Sens Actuators B 94:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rahimi E, Hashemi M, Baghbadorani ZT (2009) Determination of cadmium and lead in human milk. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6:671–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raja CE, Selvam GS (2011) Construction of green fluorescent protein based bacterial biosensor for heavy metal remediation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8:793–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogers B, Manning L, Jones M, Sulchek T et al (2003) Mercury vapor detection with a self-sensing, resonating piezoelectric cantilever. Rev Sci Instrum 74:4899–4901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sambles JR, Bradbery GW, Yang F (1991) Optical excitation of surface plasmons: an introduction. Contemp Phys 32:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sathawara NG, Parikh DJ, Agarwal YK (2004) Essential heavy metals in environmental samples from western India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73:756–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Şen A, Pereira H, Olivella MA, Villaescusa I (2015) Heavy metals removal in aqueous environments using bark as a biosorbent. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(1):391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sota H, Hasegawa Y, Iwakura M (1998) Detection of conformational changes in an immobilized protein using surface plasmon resonance. Anal Chem 70:2019–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner APF, Karube I, Wilson GS (1987) Biosensors: fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Ustundag Z, Caglayan MO, Guzel R, Piskin E, Solak AO (2011) A novel surface plasmon resonance enhanced total internal reflection ellipsometric application: electrochemically grafted isophtalic acid nanofilm on gold surface. Analyst 136:1464–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yap WF, Yunus M, Mahmood W et al (2011) Surface plasmon resonance optical sensor for mercury ion detection by crosslinked chitosan thin film. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 13:279–285Google Scholar
  30. Yu JCC, Lai EPC, Sadeghi S (2004) Surface plasmon resonance sensor for Hg(II) detection by binding interactions with polypyrrole and mercaptobenzothiazole. Sens Actuators B 101:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang XB, Guo CC, Li ZZ, Shen GL, Yu RQ (2002) An optical fiber chemical sensor for mercury ions based on a porphyrin dimer. Anal Chem 74:821–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanotechnology DepartmentCumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey

Personalised recommendations