Advertisement

Waste water management and water quality of river Yamuna in the megacity of Delhi

  • M. Parween
  • AL. Ramanathan
  • N. J. Raju
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study aims at assessing water quality of river Yamuna in one of the world’s most polluted and populated megacities, Delhi. Conductivity, salinity and sodium content were within the permissible categories. Chloride concentration exceeded acceptable levels of drinking water guidelines. Water quality was poor at all locations with respect to heavy metal contamination, especially along the lower section of the Delhi stretch. Heavy metal concentrations were manifold higher than the acceptable limits of drinking water according to the BIS guidelines and reached ~29, 4.9, 10, 31, 27, 83, 7.3 and 27 times higher, respectively, for metals aluminum, copper, chromium, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese and nickel. The Najafgarh and the Shahdara drains are major point sources. Low oxidation–reduction potential reflected high organic loads and traces of eutrophication together with significant levels of nitrate and total phosphate. Discharges from agriculture, sewage and power plants could be important sources of high metal concentration. This calls for urgent measures to be taken for prevention of metal contamination in the river, through both, technology as well as implementation of regulations in order to sustain huge populations in megacities like Delhi. Waste water treatment from point sources needs tremendous improvement on the city. Treatment of the entire waste generated up to the tertiary level is required for minimizing dissolved solids, especially toxic metals, and rendering reuse in agriculture suitable. Treatment plants need proper operation, maintenance, uninterrupted power supply and regular monitoring. Various measure and programmes need to be undertaken to ensure safe reuse of wastewater.

Keywords

Heavy metals Hydrochemistry Major ions nutrients Pollution Sewage treatment Toxic metals Waste water treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This piece of research is a part of the Ph.D. thesis of one of the authors. Facilities provided by the School of Environmental Sciences, the Central Instrumentation Facility of the school and the Advanced Instrumentation Research Facility, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi are duly acknowledged by the authors.

References

  1. Adriano DC (1986) Trace elements in the terrestrial environment. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Alloway BJ (ed) (1995) Heavy metals in soils. Blackie Academic and Professional, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora J, Mehra NK (2003) Seasonal dynamics of rotifers in relation to physical and chemical conditions of the river Yamuna (Delhi), India. Hydrobiologia 491(1):101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2000) Toxicological profile for chromium: updates. Department of Health and Human Services, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  6. Back W (1966) Hydrochemical facies and ground-water flow patterns in northern part of Atlantic Coastal Plain. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper: 498-A. 42Google Scholar
  7. BIS (2012) Indian Standard drinking water—specification (Second Revision). IS 10500: 2012, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India Google Scholar
  8. Chakrapani GJ (2005) Major and trace element geochemistry in upper Ganga river in the Himalayas, India. Environ Geol 48(2):189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chuang MC, Shu GY, Lin JC (1996) Solubility of heavy metals in a contaminated soil: effects of redox potential pH. Water Air Soil Pollut 90:543–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CPCB (1999). Status of water supply and wastewater collection treatment and disposal in class I Cities-1999, Control of Urban Pollution Series: CUPS/44/1999-2000Google Scholar
  11. CPCB (2005a) Status of sewage treatment in India. Central Pollution Control Board November 2005Google Scholar
  12. CPCB (2005b) Performance status of common effluent treatment plants in India. Central Pollution Control Board, India.Google Scholar
  13. CPCB (2007) Advance methods for treatment of textile industry effluents, Resource Recycling Series: RERES/&/2007. Central Pollution Control Board, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalai TK, Krishnaswami S, Sarin MM (2002) Major ion chemistry in the headwaters of the Yamuna river system: chemical weathering, its temperature dependence and CO2 consumption in the Himalaya. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66(19):3397–3416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis SN, De Wiest RJM (1966) Hydrogeology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhillon MK, George MP, Mishra S (2013) Water quality of River Yamuna-Delhi stretch. Int J Environ Sci 3(5):1416Google Scholar
  17. DJB (Delhi Jal Board), Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) (2017). http://www.delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/doit_djb/DJB/Home/About+Us
  18. Dzombak DA, Morel FM (1987) Adsorption of inorganic pollutants in aquatic systems. J Hydraul Eng 113(4):430–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fan Q, He J, Xue H, Lü C, Sun Y, Shen L et al (2008) Heavy metal pollution in the Baotou section of the Yellow River, China. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 20(2):65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grasshoff K, Kremling K, Ehrhardt M (1999) Methods of seawater analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta VK, Ali I, Saleh TA, Nayak A, Agarwal S (2012) Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—an overview. RSC Adv 2(16):6380–6388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta VK, Kumar R, Nayak A, Saleh TA, Barakat MA (2013) Adsorptive removal of dyes from aqueous solution onto carbon nanotubes: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 193:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang PM, Germida JJ (2002) Chemical and biological processes in the rhizosphere: metal pollutants. IUPAC Ser Anal Phys Chem Environ Syst 8:381–438Google Scholar
  24. Husson O (2013) Redox potential (Eh) and pH as drivers of soil/plant/microorganism systems: a transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative opportunities for agronomy. Plant Soil 362(1–2):389–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaur R, Wani SP, Singh AK, Lal K (2012) Wastewater production, treatment and use in India. In: National report presented at the 2nd regional workshop on safe use of wastewater in agricultureGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan MT, Biswas S (2013) Investigation of heavy metal pollution in peripheral river water around Dhaka city. Pensee 75(10)Google Scholar
  27. Klein DH, Andren AW, Carter JA, Emery JF, Feldman C, Fulkerson W et al (1975) Pathways of thirty-seven trace elements through coal-fired power plant. Environ Sci Technol 9(10):973–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee RE Jr, Duffield FV (1977) Sources of environmentally important metals in the atmosphere. Adv Chem Ser 172:146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandal P, Upadhyay R, Hasan A (2010) Seasonal and spatial variation of Yamuna River water quality in Delhi, India. Environ Monit Assess 170(1):661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLaughlin MJ, Palmer LT, Tiller KG, Beech TA, Smart MK (1994) Increased soil salinity causes elevated cadmium concentrations in field-grown potato tubers. J Environ Qual 23(5):1013–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MFE (2008) Possible contaminants from activities grouped by landuse. Ministry of Environment, New Zealand. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/water/introduction-users-nes-human-drinking-water-jun08/html/table-a1.html
  32. Parween M, Ramanathan AL, Raju NJ, Khillare PS (2014) Persistence, variance and toxic levels of organochlorine pesticides in fluvial sediments and the role of black carbon in their retention. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(10):6525–6546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parween M, Ramanathan AL, Raju NJ, Khillare PS (2016) Persistent pesticides in fluvial sediment and their relationship with black carbon. In: Raju NJ (ed) Geostatistical and Geospatial Approaches for the Characterization of Natural Resources in the Environment. Springer, cham, pp 355–359Google Scholar
  34. Piper AM (1953) A graphic procedure in the chemical interpretation of water analysis. USGS Groundwater Note, 12Google Scholar
  35. Ravindra K, Kaushik A (2003) Seasonal variations in physico-chemical characteristics of River Yamuna in Haryana and its ecological best-designated use. J Environ Monit 5(3):419. doi: 10.1039/b301723k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rawat M, Moturi MCZ, Subramanian V (2003) Inventory compilation and distribution of heavy metals in wastewater from small-scale industrial areas of Delhi, India. J Environ Monit 5(6):906. doi: 10.1039/b306628b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richards LA (ed) (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils [Online]. http://www.ussl.ars.usda.gov/hb60/hb60.htm. Verified 17 June 2004. Agriculture Handbook No. 60. USDA, Riverside, CA
  38. Saleh TA, Gupta VK (2012) Photo-catalyzed degradation of hazardous dye methyl orange by use of a composite catalyst consisting of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and titanium dioxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 371(1):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saleh A, Al-Ruwaih F, Shehata M (1999) Hydrogeochemical processes operating within the main aquifers of Kuwait. J Arid Environ 42(3):195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saravanan R, Karthikeyan S, Gupta VK, Sekaran G, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2013) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnO/CuO nanocomposite for the degradation of textile dye on visible light illumination. Mater Sci Eng C 33(1):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saravanan R, Gupta VK, Mosquera E, Gracia F, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2015a) Visible light induced degradation of methyl orange using β-Ag 0.333 V 2 O 5 nanorod catalysts by facile thermal decomposition method. J Saudi Chem Soc 19(5):521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saravanan R, Gracia F, Khan MM, Poornima V, Gupta VK, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2015b) ZnO/CdO nanocomposites for textile effluent degradation and electrochemical detection. J Mol Liq 209:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharmeen R, Khan MZ, Yasmeen G, Ghalib SA (2014) Levels of heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, copper and lead) on water and selected tissues of Oreochromis mossambicus from different locations of Malir River, Karachi. Can J Pure Appl Sci 3011Google Scholar
  44. Singh M (2001) Heavy metal pollution in freshly deposited sediments of the Yamuna River (the Ganges River tributary): a case study from Delhi and Agra urban centres, India. Environ Geol 40(6):664–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh SK, Trivedi JR, Pande K, Ramesh R, Krishnaswami S (1998) Chemical and Sr, O, C isotopic compositions of carbonates from the Lesser Himalaya: implications to the Sr isotope composition of the source waters of the Ganga, Ghaghara and the Indus Rivers. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skjelkvsle BL (1994) Factors influencing fluoride in Norwegian lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut 77:151–167Google Scholar
  47. Tahri M, Benyaich F, Bounakhla M, Bilal E, Gruffat JJ et al (2005) Multivariate analysis of heavy metals in soils, sediments and water in the region of Meknes (Central Mexico). Environ Monit Assess 102:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tare V (2010) Sewage Treatment in Class I Towns: Recommendations and Guidelines. Report Code: 003_GBP_IIT_EQP_S&R_02_Ver 1_Dec 2010Google Scholar
  49. Trisal C, Tabassum T, Kumar R (2008) Water quality of the river Yamuna in the Delhi stretch: key determinants and management issues. Clean Soil Air Water 36(3):306–314. doi: 10.1002/clen.200700044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. UNEP (ed) (2004) Chapter 4. Wastewater technologies. In: UNEP (ed) (2004) A directory of environmentally sound technologies for the integrated management of solid, liquid and hazardous waste for SIDS in the Caribbean Region. Nairobi, pp 63–125Google Scholar
  51. Upadhyay R, Dasgupta N, Hasan A, Upadhyay SK (2011) Managing water quality of River Yamuna in NCR Delhi. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 36(9):372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weggler K, McLaughlin MJ, Graham RD (2004) Effect of chloride in soil solution on the plant availability of biosolid-borne cadmium. J Environ Qual 33(2):496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. WHO, World Health Organization (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: incorporating first addendum, vol 1, 3rd ed. RecommendationsGoogle Scholar
  54. WHO, World Health Organization (2008) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 3rd ednGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilcox LV (1948) The quality of water for irrigation use (No. 170282). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  56. WSP (ed) (2008) Technology options for urban sanitation in India. A guide to decision-making. pdf presentation. Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), New DelhiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Advanced StudiesBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations