Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced control of activated sludge process using predetermined set-points

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of activated sludge process (ASP) is evaluated by the effluent quality which is determined by five different variables of the treated wastewater such as ammonia, total nitrogen, COD, BOD5 and TSS. To keep these five variables within the limits as per environmental regulations, nitrate and nitrite concentration (S NO) in the second anoxic reactor and the dissolved oxygen concentration (S O) in the last aerobic reactor of the ASP should be maintained at prescribed levels. To do that, a closed-loop control configuration is required and proper set-points for these closed-loop control configurations are needed. In this paper, the optimal values of controller set-points are determined for nitrogen removal in the activated sludge process. Effluent quality limits have been considered to evaluate the optimal set-points for the Indian climatic conditions. Once the optimal set-points are determined, PI controllers are used to control S NO in the second anoxic reactor and S O in the last aerobic reactor of the ASP. Further, feed-forward control is incorporated to minimize the effect of disturbances, which enters along with the influent. No case studies of BSM1 model have been reported in the literature for the Indian wastewater. In this work, the dynamic simulation of an activated sludge process is performed using the data collected from the sewage treatment plant, located in India. The results of the simulation showed that feed-forward with PI control strategy, ASP can be efficiently controlled without any effluent violations, when compared to BSM1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alex J, Benedetti L, Copp J, Gernaey KV, Jeppsson U, Nopens I, Pons MN, Rieger L, Rosen C, Steyer JP, Vanrolleghem P, Winkler S (2008) Benchmark simulation model no. 1 (BSM1). Technical report, Dept. of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation. Lund University, Sweden

  • Amand L, Carlsson B (2012) Optimal aeration control in a nitrifying activated sludge process. Water Res 46:2101–2110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo ACB, Gallani S, Mulas M, Olsson G (2011) Systematic approach to the design of operation and control policies in activated sludge systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:8542–8557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp JB (2002) The COST simulation benchmark—description and simulator manual. Office for official publications of the European communities

  • Gernaey KV, Jeppsson U, Vanrolleghem PA, Copp JB (2014) Benchmarking of control strategies for wastewater treatment plants. Scientific and technical report series no. 23. IWA Publishing, London

  • Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M (2000) Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingildsen P, Olsson G, Yuan Z (2002) A hedging point strategy—balancing effluent quality, economy and robustness in the control of wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):317–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Insel GH, Gorgun E, Artan N, Orhon D (2009) Model based optimization of nitrogen removal in a full scale activated sludge plant. Environ Eng Sci 26(3):471–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machado VC, Gabriel D, Lafuente J, Baeza JA (2009) Cost and effluent quality controllers design based on the relative gain array for a nutrient removal WWTP. Water Res 43:5129–5141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marlin TE (2000) Process control: designing processes and control systems for dynamic performance. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin SJ, Badgwell TA (2003) A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Eng Pract 11(7):733–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger L, Jones RM, Dold PL, Bott CB (2014) Ammonia-based feedforward and feedback aeration control in activated sludge processes. Water Environ Res 86(1):63–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson P, Halvarsson B, Carlsson B (2007) Cost-efficient operation of a denitrifying activated sludge process. Water Res 41:2325–2332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stare A, Vrecko D, Hvala N, Strmcnik S (2007) Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study. Water Res 41:2004–2014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs I, Patry GG, Nolasco D (1991) A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process. Water Res 25:1263–1271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrecko D, Hvala N, Kocijan J, Zec M (2001) System analysis for optimal control of a wastewater treatment benchmark. Water Sci Technol 43(7):199–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrecko D, Hvala N, Kocijan J (2002) Wastewater treatment benchmark: what can be achieved with simple control. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):127–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrecko D, Hvala N, Carlsson B (2003) Feedforward-feedback control of an activated sludge process: a simulation study. Water Sci Technol 47(12):19–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yong M, Yongzhen P, Jeppsson U (2006) Dynamic evaluation of integrated control strategies for enhanced nitrogen removal in activated sludge processes. Control Eng Pract 14:1269–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Z, Keller J (2003) Integrated control of nitrate recirculation and external carbon addition in a predenitrification system. Water Sci Technol 48(11–12):345–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Z, Oehmen A, Ingildsen P (2002) Control of nitrate recirculation flow in predenitrification systems. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):29–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Seshagiri Rao.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Binbin Huang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vivekanandan, B., Rao, A.S. & Saravananae, R. Enhanced control of activated sludge process using predetermined set-points. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 487–496 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1157-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1157-2

Keywords

Navigation