Effectiveness of rice husk ash in stabilizing Kenyan red coffee soil for road subgrades construction

Short Communication
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

The high cost of traditional stabilizing agents such as lime and cement has led to the research on industrial and agricultural wastes as suitable alternatives. Rice growing areas of Kenya accumulate large quantities of rice husk which pose serious disposal problems. When burnt as a means of disposal, the rice husk ash formed is difficult to coagulate and thus contribute to air and water pollution, require a large space for disposal, and cause respiratory health problems when inhaled. Red coffee soil poses serious engineering problems such as swelling due to wetting, shrinkage due to drying, low bearing capacity, and differential settlement leading to cracks and needs improvement for strength and stability in service. Red coffee soil and rice husks samples were obtained from Gatundu and Mwea, respectively. The rice husk was burnt at temperatures between 500 and 700 °C to ensure maximal formation of siliceous component. Chemical analysis on the rice husk ash gave the sum of SiO2, Fe2O3, and Al2O3 as 85.5 % indicating that it has pozzolanic activity. Rice husk ash was applied at 4, 6, 8, and 10 % by weight of dry soil. Plasticity index, liquid limit, and linear shrinkage decreased from 26.1, 67.1, and 13.0 % for lean sample to 18.5, 63.6, and 9.2 %, for 10 % rice husk ash stabilized samples, whereas plastic limit increased from 41.0 to 45.15 %. The soaked California bearing ratio value for rice husk ash stabilized samples increased from 5 to 22 % corresponding to soil subgrade class S4. However, lime-stabilized samples gave higher values.

Keywords

California bearing ratio Lime Liquid limit Plastic limit Pozzolana Red coffee soil Rice husk ash 

References

  1. ASTM C618 (2003) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. American Society For Testing and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  2. BS 1377 (1990) Methods of testing soils for civil engineering purposes. British Standard Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuisinier O, Auriol J-C, Borgne TL, Deneele D (2011) Microstructure and hydraulic conductivity of a compacted lime-treated soil. Eng Geol 123:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kamau GN, Mbindyo JKN, Githinji ZP, Tuts RJR, Kinyua AM (1993) Rice husk ash and its application as a cement replacement material in Kenya. Int J BioChem Phys 2:138–142Google Scholar
  5. Kenya Roads Design Manual Part 3, 1987. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  6. Kishore G, Pandey V, Singh JP (2015) Enhancing the engineering properties of soil stabilized with lime and rice husk ash. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 4:4857–4864Google Scholar
  7. Mandeed S, Anupam M (2014) A review on the soil stabilization with waste materials. Int J Eng Res Appl 2:11–16Google Scholar
  8. Musa A (2008) Potentials of rice husk ash for soil stabilization. Assumpt Univ J Technol 11:246–250Google Scholar
  9. Nair DG, Fraaij A, Adri AKK, Arno PMK (2008) A structural investigation relating to the pozzolanic activity of rice husk ashes. Cem Concr Res 38:861–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Siddique A, Hossain MA (2011) Effects of lime stabilization on engineering properties of an expansive soil for use in road construction. J Soc Transp Traffic Stud 2:1–9Google Scholar
  11. Tran TD, Cui Y-J, Tang AM, Audiguier M, Cojean R (2014) Effects of lime treatment on the microstructure and hydraulic conductivity of Hericourt clay. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wansom S, Janjaturaphan S, Sinthupinyo S (2009) Pozzolanic activity of rice husk ash: comparison of various electrical methods. J Met Mat Minerals 19:1–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Construction EngineeringThe Technical University of KenyaNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations