Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-objective optimal layout of distributed storm-water detention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determination of locations and sizes for such a system is important in a drainage master plan or a storm-water management system. However, the distribution of detentions in the upstream and midstream is often more dispersed using many combinations of volume scales. This paper uses the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm combined with the Storm Water Management Model to explore and calculate the optimal layout scheme for decentralized rainwater detention. The purpose is to find a design and planning method that can achieve the optimal balance of decentralized detention considering the aspects of flood disaster control, peak flow reduction, and investment cost. The optimal results of Pareto in applied case show that among the five most unfavourable nodes, the detentions with different layout volumes and relatively smaller size can control water logging from rainstorm. The project cost is effectively reduced and the standard of the return period of the regional rainwater system is enhanced from 2 to 20 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behera PK, Papa F, Adams BJ (1999) Optimization of regional storm-water management systems. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management 125(2):107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummer J (1995) A constructive solution for optimal local control of runoff events. Math Comput Simul 39(1):39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cembrano G, Quevedo J, Salamero M, Puig V, Figueras J, MartÍ J (2004) Optimal control of urban drainage systems. A case study. Control Eng Pract 12(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-Ii. Evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans 6(2):182–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeland Kolbjørn, Braud Isabelle, Gottschalk Lars, Leblois Etienne (2006) Multi-objective regional modelling. J Hydrol 327(3–4):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Guangtao, Butler David, Khu Soon-Thiam (2008) Multiple objective optimal control of integrated urban wastewater systems. Environ Model Softw 23(2):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk Lars, Weingartner Rolf (1998) Distribution of peak flow derived from a distribution of rainfall volume and runoff coefficient, and a unit hydrograph. J Hydrol 208(3–4):148–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemette François, Plamondon André P, Prévost Marcel, Lévesque Denis (2005) Rainfall generated stormflow response to clearcutting a boreal forest: peak flow comparison with 50 world-wide basin studies. J Hydrol 302(1–4):137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbo Bekithemba, Munyamba Nelson, Sithole George, Savenije HHG (2002) Coupling of digital elevation model and rainfall-runoff model in storm drainage network design. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 27(11–22):755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Yao-Ming (2010) Experimental evaluation of design methods for in-site detention ponds. Int J Sedim Res 25(1):52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal Jawed, Guria Chandan (2009) Optimization of an operating domestic wastewater treatment plant using elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Chem Eng Res Des 87(11):1481–1496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaini P, Artita K, Nicklow JW (2007) Evaluating optimal detention pond locations at a watershed scale. World environmental and water resources congress 2007: restoring our natural habitat, 2007 ASCE

  • Kibler DF, Froelich CD, Aron G (2007) Analyzing urbanization impacts on Pennsylvania flood peaks. J Am Water Resour Assoc 17(2):270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski R, Reuber J, Köngeter J (1999) Investigations into and optimisation of the performance of sewage detention tanks during storm rainfall events. Water Sci Technol 39(2):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Jae Su, Li Ming-Han (2009) The impact of detention basin design on residential property value: case studies using gis in the hedonic price modeling. Landsc Urban Plan 89(1–2):7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard P, Beck MB (1991) Dynamic simulation of storm tanks. Water Res 25(4):375–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW, Bedient PB (1982) Model for optimal size and location of detention. J Water Resour Plann Manage 108(3):270–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah Saralees, Kotz Samuel (2007) Exact distribution of the peak runoff. J Hydrol 338(3–4):325–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nirupama N, Simonovic SP (2007) Increase of flood risk due to urbanization: a Canadian example. Nat Hazards 40:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa Fabian, Adams Barry J (1997) Application of derived probability and dynamic programming techniques to planning regional stormwater management systems. Water Sci Technol 36(5):227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson J (2000) The hydraulic performance of ponds of various layouts. Urban Water 2(3):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson J, Somes NLG, Wong THF (1999) Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Sci Technol 40(3):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathnam EV, Mahammad Abdulla S, Jayakumar KV (2002) Urban runoff estimation and optimization of stormwater detention systems-a case study for Hyderabad city. India, Urban Drainage

    Google Scholar 

  • Rié Komuro E, Ford David, Reynolds Joel H (2006) The use of multi-criteria assessment in developing a process model. Ecol Model 197(3–4):320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LA Rossman (2004) Storm water management model user’s manual (Version 5.0)

  • Scholz Miklas (2004) Case study: design, operation, maintenance and water quality management of sustainable storm water ponds for roof runoff. Bioresour Technol 95(3):269–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segarra Rafael I (1995) Optimal design of runoff storage/release systems. Water Sci Technol 32(1):193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim Low Kwai, Balamurugan G (1991) Urbanization and urban water problems in southeast Asia a case of unsustainable development. J Environ Manage 32(3):195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhyung J, Minock C (2007) Using SWMM as a tool for hydrologic impact assessment. Desalination 212:344–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis Quentin B, Mays Larry W (2008) Optimizing retention basin networks. J Water Resour Plann Manage 134(5):432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang S, Griffiths John F (1988) A survey of agrometeorological disasters in south China. Agric For Meteorol 43(3–4):261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh CH, Labadie JW (1997) Multiobjective watershed-level planning of storm water detention systems. J Water Resour Plann Manage 123(6):336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Lin, Zhang Liquan, Xiao Derong, Huang Huamei (2011) The application of cutting plus waterlogging to control spartina alterniflora On Saltmarshes in the Yangtze estuary, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 92(1):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhen X-Y, Yu S-L, Lin J-Y (2004) Optimal location and sizing of stormwater basins at watershed scale. J Water Resour Plann Manage 130(4):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding support from The Major Science and Technology Project-Water Pollution Control and Treatment (No. 2009ZX07317-008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Xin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, T., Wang, J., Xin, K. et al. Multi-objective optimal layout of distributed storm-water detention. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11, 1473–1480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0330-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0330-0

Keywords

Navigation