Development of industrial waste disposal scenarios using life-cycle assessment approach

Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, environmental impacts of industrial waste disposal of used lubricating oils and sulphur wastes scenarios have been investigated and modeled. The life-cycle assessment methodology was selected among the environmental impact assessment methods. In this method environmental issues and burdens were quantitated in order to facilitate the comparison. In this regard, options with the least adverse impacts were suggested. Functional unit of the study has also been defined as amount of used lubricating oils and sulphur wastes in terms of kilograms based on capacity of transitional barrel. Accordingly, the system boundaries were selected for life cycle of the wastes produced in sulphur unit of Tehran Oil Refinery. Since the main disposal method applied in Tehran Oil Refinery was transference to the municipal landfill, two incineration and landfilling scenarios were modeled for used lubricating oils and sulphur wastes by means of Simapro-7.1 software. Then, the outputs of these scenarios were compared in terms of the least environmental impacts by EDIP 2003 and Ecoindicator 99 methods. Finally, incineration scenarios were recommended as the most efficient ones.

Keywords

Industrial waste Life-cycle assessment Oil refinery Sulphur solid waste Used lubricating oil disposal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to extend their sincere gratitude to PRẻ Consultant Institute who provided the appropriate software and to the Graduate School of the Environment and Energy, Tehran Science and Research Branch, IAU.

References

  1. Al-Salem SM (2009) Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management in the state of Kuwait. Eur J Sci Res 34(3):395–405Google Scholar
  2. Chen HW, Yu RF, Liaw SL, Huang WC (2010) Information policy and management framework for environmental protection organization with ecosystem conception. Int J Sci Tech 7(2):313–326Google Scholar
  3. Curran MA (2006) Environmental life cycle assessment. National risk management research laboratory, office of research and development, U.S. Environmental protection agency, EPA/600/R-92/245, McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Dando DA, Martin DE (2003) A guide for reduction and disposal of waste from oil refineries and marketing installations. CONCAWE/6/03. BrusselGoogle Scholar
  5. DOE (1995) Oil refineries and bulk storage of crude oil and petroleum products, department of the environment industry profile. Crown copyrightGoogle Scholar
  6. Elshorbagy W, Alkamali A (2005) Solid waste generation from oil and gas industries in United Arab Emirates. J Hazard Mater 120(2):89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Epstein PR, Slber J (2002) Oil/life cycle analysis of its health and environmental impacts. The center for health and global environment Publishing Chge Web. http://www.med.harvard.edu/chge/oil.html
  8. Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg A (2000) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste. fms/2000/R-2/137. FOA Repro, UrsvikGoogle Scholar
  9. Goedkoop M, Schryver AD, Oele M (2008) Introduction to LCA with Simapro. Product ecology consultants (Pre), Pre/2008/4.2Google Scholar
  10. Guereca LP, Gasso S, Baldasano JM, Guerrero PJ (2006) Life cycle assessment of two biowaste management systems for Barcelona. Resour Conserv Recycl 49(1):32–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guinee JB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment, operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  12. Guinee JB (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ISO 14041 (1998) Environmental management-life cycle assessment: goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Organisation for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO 14042 (2000) Environmental management-life cycle assessment: life cycle impact assessment. International Organisation for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. Levan SL (2007) Life cycle assessment: measuring environmental impact. Int J Life Cycle Ass 12(1):61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liamsanguan C, Gheewala SH (2007) LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems. J Environ Manage 87(1):132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monavari SM (2009) Management and design of urban solid wastes collection. Jihad Daneshgahi Amir Kabir Industrial Unit, TehranGoogle Scholar
  18. Nouri N, Poorhashemi SA, Monavari SM, Dabiri F, Hassani AH (2011) Legal criteria and executive standards of solid waste disposal subjected to solid waste management act. Int J Environ Res 5(4):971–980Google Scholar
  19. Ortiz M, Raluy RG, Serra L, Uche J (2006) Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town. J Desalination 204(2):121–131Google Scholar
  20. Tehrani SM, Karbassi AR, Monavari SM, Mirbagheri SA (2010) Role of e-shopping management strategy in urban environment. Int J Environ Res 4(4):681–690Google Scholar
  21. White N, Clift R, Holmes P, Basson L, Weston N (2011) Streamlined life cycle approaches for use at oil refineries and other large industrial facilities. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(3):1624–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zaman AU (2010) Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycle assessment method. Int J Sci Tech 7(2):225–234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CEERS, IAU 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Management, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Doctoral Program in Environmental Management, Earth and Environmental StudiesMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA

Personalised recommendations