Skip to main content
Log in

Lacosamide in patients with intellectual disability and refractory epilepsy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) in residential patients at our epilepsy centre. We assessed retrospectively 80 patients (mean age 36.2 years, range 18–63 years; 29 female) with intellectual disability (ID) and drug-resistant epilepsy using an industry-independent, non-interventional study design based on standardised seizure records. Evaluation, including calculation of retention rate, was carried out for the intervals 3–6, 9–12 and 21–24 months after LCM initiation. The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) was used to allow assessment of qualitative changes in seizure severity and clinical status. CGI improved for 61% of the patients. The responder rate was 48%; ten patients (13%) became seizure free. The response was not related to the degree of ID. The retention rates after 12 and 24 months were 71% and 65%, and were significantly lower in patients taking other sodium-channel blockers (SCBs; 76% vs. 55%). The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was related to the administration of concomitant SCBs (48% with SCBs vs. 26% without). Sedation (15%), ataxia (13%), vertigo (11%), and nausea (9%) were the commonest AEs. While 60% of our patients had concomitant psychiatric diagnosis, we found no relevant effect of this on challenging behaviour. Adjunctive LCM may provide an antiepileptic treatment option for patients with ID with or without additional psychiatric diagnosis. The occurrence of AEs and the LCM retention rate were affected by concomitant SCB use but not by psychiatric comorbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shneker B, Fountain N (2003) Epilepsy. Dis Mon 49:426–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Airaksinen E, Matilainen R, Mononen T, Mustonen K, Partanen J, Jokela V et al (2000) A population-based study on epilepsy in mentally retarded children. Epilepsia 41(9):1214–1220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez N, Besag F, Iivanainen M (1998) Use of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of epilepsy in people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 42(Suppl 1):1–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson G (2002) Efficacy of levetiracetam in developmentally disabled patients: a review of the literature and six case reports. Epilepsy Behav 3:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerr M, Espie C (1997) Learning disability and epilepsy, 1: towards common outcome measures. Seizure 6:331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Errington S, Coyne L, Stöhr T, Selve N, Lees G (2006) Seeking a mechanism of action for the novel anticonvulsant lacosamide. Neuropharmacology 50(8):1016–1029 (abstract)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hovinga C (2003) SPM-927 (Schwarz Pharma). IDrugs 6:479–485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bialer M, Johannessen S, Kupferberg H, Levy R, Perucca E, Tomson T (2007) Progress report on the new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the EILAT Conference (EILAT VIII). Epilepsy Res 73(1):1–52 (abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horstmann R, Bonn R, Cawello W, Doty P, Rudd G (2002) Basic clinical pharmacological investigations of the new antiepileptic drug SPM-927. Epilepsia 43:188

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas D, Scharfenecker U, Nickel B, Doty P, Cawello W, Horstmann R (2006) Low potential for drug-drug interactions of lacosamide. Epilepsia 47:200

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kropeit D (2006) Lacosamide has low potential for drug-drug interaction. J Pain 7:S63 (abstract 851)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Menachem E, Biton V, Abou-Khalil B, Doty P, Rudd D (2007) Efficacy and safety of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures. Epilepsia 48(7):1308–1317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung S, Sperling M, Biton V, Krauss G, Rudd G, Doty P, SP754 Study Group (2010) Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures: a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia 51(6):958–967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Halász P, Kälviäinen R, Mazurkiewicz-Beldzińska M, Rosenow F, Doty P, Hebert D et al (2009) Adjunctive lacosamide for partial-onset seizures: efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia 50(3):443–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sawh S, Newman J, Deshpande S, Jones P (2013) Lacosamide adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures: a meta-analysis. PeerJ 1:e114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Weston J, Shukralla A, McKay AJ, Marson AG (2015) Lacosamide add-on therapy for partial epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD008841 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Biton V, Gil-Nagel A, Isojarvi J, Doty P, Hebert D, Fountain N (2015) Safety and tolerability of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures: analysis of data pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Epilepsy Behav 52:119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Runge U, Arnold S, Brandt C, Reinhardt F, Kühn F, Isensee K et al (2015) A noninterventional study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of lacosamide added to monotherapy in patients with epilepsy with partial-onset seizures in daily clinical practice: the VITOBA study. Epilepsia 56(12):1921–1930 (abstract)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Andrade-Machado R, Benjumea-Cuartas V, Jaramillo-Jimenez E (2012) Lacosamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: case report. Clin Neuropharmacol 35(3):148–149 (abstract)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cuzzola A, Ferlazzo E, Italiano D, Calabrò R, Bramanti P, Genton P (2010) Does lacosamide aggravate Lennox-Gastaut syndrome? Report on three consecutive cases. Epilepsy Behav 19(4):650–651 (abstract)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Böttcher S, Lutz M, Mayer T (2017) Lacosamide in the treatment of patients with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities: a long-term study of 136 patients. Epilepsia 58(10):1749–1754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrade-Machado R, Luque-Navarro-de Los Reyes J, Benjumea-Cuartas V, Restrepo J, Jaramillo-Jiménez E, Andrade-Gutierrez G et al (2015) Efficacy and tolerability of add-on Lacosamide treatment in adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: an observational study. Seizure 33:81–87 (abstract)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Flores L, Kemp S, Colbeck K, Moran N, Quirk J, Ramkolea P et al (2012) Clinical experience with oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with uncontrolled epilepsy: a multicenter study in epilepsy clinics in the United Kingdom (UK). Seizure 21(7):512–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grosso S, Coppola G, Cusmai R, Parisi P, Spalice A, Foligno S et al (2014) Efficacy and tolerability of add-on lacosamide in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 129(6):420–424 (abstract)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Linden M, Baier D, Beitinger H, Kohnen R, Osterheider M, Philipp M et al (1994) Leitlinien zur Durchführung von Anwendungsbeobachtungen in der Psychopharmakotherapie. Der Nervenarzt 65:638–644

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheffer IE, Berkovic S, Capovilla G, Connolly MB, French J, Guilhoto L et al (2017) ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 58(4):512–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guy W (1976) CGI: clinical global impressions. ECDEU assessment manual for Psychopharmacology, revised, pp 217–222

  28. Steffenburg U, Hedström A, Lindroth A, Wiklund LM, Hagberg G, Kyllermann M (1998) Intractable epilepsy in a population-based series of mentally retarded children. Epilepsia 39(7):767–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Uvebrant P, Bauzienè R (1994) Intractable epilepsy in children. The efficacy of lamotrigine treatment, including non-seizure-related benefits. Neuropediatrics 25(6):284–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Crawford P, Brown S, Kerr M, Parke Davis Clinical Trials Group (2001) A randomised open-label study of gabapentine and lamotrigine in adults with learning disability and resistant epilepsy. Seizure 10:107–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. King JA, Knight JE, Oommen KJ (1996) Efficacy of lamotrigine in the developmentally disabled (abstract). Epilepsia 37:162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huber B, Tomka-Hoffmeister M (2003) Limited efficacy of gabapentin in severe therapy-resistant epilepsies of learning-disabled patients. Seizure 12(8):602–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huber B, Bömmel W, Hauser I, Horstmann V, Liem S, May T et al (2004) Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in patients with therapy-resistant epilepsy and learning disabilities. Seizure 13(3):168–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kelly K, Stephen L, Sills G, Brodie M (2002) Topiramate in patients with learning disability and refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia 43(4):399–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh BK, White-Scott S (2002) Role of topiramate in adults with intractable epilepsy, mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Seizure 11(1):47–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenow F, Kelemen A, Ben-Menachem E et al (2015) Long-term adjunctive lacosamide treatment in patients with partial-onset seizures. Acta Neurol Scand 133(2):136–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beran R, Gibson R (1998) Aggressive behaviour in intellectually challenged patients with epilepsy treated with lamotrigine. Epilepsia 39(3):280–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Harden C (2001) Safety profile of levetiracetam. Epilepsia 42(Suppl 4):36–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Andres E, Kerling F, Hamer H, Burkhard K, Winterholler M (2017) Behavioural changes in patients with intellectual disability treated with perampanel. Acta Neurol Scan 136(6):645–653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Coppola G, Verrotti A, Resicato G, Ferrarelli S, Auricchio G, Operto FF, Pascotto A (2008) Topiramate in children and adolescents with epilepsy and mental retardation: a prospective study on behavior and cognitive effects. Epilepsy Behav 12(2):253–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Andres E, Kerling F, Hamer H, Winterholler M (2018) Behavioural changes in patients with intellectual disability treated with brivaracetam. Acta Neurol Scand 138(3):195–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Foldvary-Schaefer N, Fong J, Morrison S et al (2016) Lacosamide tolerability in adult patients with partial-onset seizures: impact of planned reduction and mechanism of action of concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsy Behav 57:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Novy J, Patsalos PN, Sander JW et al (2011) Lacosamide neurotoxicity associated with concomitant use of sodium channel-blocking antiepileptic drugs: a pharmacodynamic interaction? Epilepsy Behav 20:20–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed by Anika Kleist in partial fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. med.”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Anika Kleist declares that she has no conflict of interest. Frank Kerling and Hajo Hamer have received honoraria from Eisai, UCB, Desitin, Novartis, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis. Martin Winterholler declares that he has no conflict of interest. All data generated and analysed during the current study are included in this published article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Furthermore, the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (Ethics vote no. 290-14Bc).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants or their legal representatives included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kleist, A., Kerling, F., Hamer, H. et al. Lacosamide in patients with intellectual disability and refractory epilepsy. Acta Neurol Belg 119, 423–430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01098-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01098-3

Keywords

Navigation