Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New treatment alternatives in the ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: ultrasound and low-level laser therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common entrapment neuropathy of the arm. Conservative treatment is the treatment of choice in mild to moderate cases. Elbow splints and avoiding flexion of the involved elbow constitute majority of the conservative treatment; indeed, there is no other non-invasive treatment modality. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound (US) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of UNE to provide an alternative conservative treatment method. A randomized single-blind study was carried out in 32 patients diagnosed with UNE. Short-segment conduction study (SSCS) was performed for the localization of the entrapment site. Patients were randomized into US treatment (frequency of 1 MHz, intensity of 1.5 W/cm2, continuous mode) and LLLT (0.8 J/cm2 with 905 nm wavelength), both applied five times a week for 2 weeks. Assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of the treatment, and at the first and third months by visual analog scale, hand grip strength, semmes weinstein monofilament test, latency change at SSCS, and patient satisfaction scale. Both treatment groups had significant improvements on clinical and electrophysiological parameters (p < 0.05) at first month with no statistically significant difference between them. Improvements in all parameters were sustained at the third month for the US group, while only changes in grip strength and latency were significant for the LLLT group at third month. The present study demonstrated that both US and LLLT provided improvements in clinical and electrophysiological parameters and have a satisfying short-term effectiveness in the treatment of UNE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell WW (2000) Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 23:450–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Posner MA (1998) Compressive ulnar neuropathies at the elbow: I. Etiology and diagnosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6:282–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozentka DJ (1998) Cubital tunnel syndrome pathophysiology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 351:90–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green JR, Rayan GM (1999) The cubital tunnel: anatomic, histologic, and biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 8:466–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Azrieli Y, Weimer L, Lovelace R, Gooch C (2003) The utility of segmental nerve conduction studies in ulnar mononeuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 7:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beekman R, Van der Plas J, Uıtdehaag BM, Schellens RL, Visser L (2004) Clinical, electrodiagnostic and sonographic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 30:202–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell WW (1999) Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 8(suppl):171–205

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L (2012) Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11(7):CD006839. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  9. McGowan AJ (1950) The results of transposition of the ulnar nerve for traumatic ulnar neuritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32(B(3)):293–301 PMID: 14778847

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar S, Fernando DJ, Veves A, Knowles EA, Young MJ, Boulton AJ (1991) Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive screening device for identifying diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 13:63–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haruo Imai H, Tajima T, Natsuma Y (1989) Interpretation of cutaneous pressure threshold (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament measurement) following median nerve repair and sensory reeducation in the adult. Microsurgery 10:142–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Visser LH, Beekman R, Franssen H (2005) Short segment nerve conduction studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 31:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Korkmaz M, On AY, Caliş FA (2011) Reference data for ulnar nerve short segment conduction studies at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 44(5):783–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong CZ, Long HA, Kanakamedala RV, Chang YM, Yates L (1996) Splinting and local steroid injection for the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: clinical and electrophysiological evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77(6):573–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alblas CL, Van KV, Jellema K (2012) Injection with corticosteroids (ultrasound guided) in patients with an ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, feasibility study. Eur J Neurol 19(12):1582–1584. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03676.x (Epub 2012 Feb 16)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson C, Saratsiotis J (2005) A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Manip Physiol Ther 28:345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Svernlöv B, Larsson M, Rehn K, Adolfsson L (2009) Conservative treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur 34:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamichi K, Tachibana S, Ida M, Yamamoto S (2009) Patient education for the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:1839–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paik NJ, Cho SH, Han TR (2002) Ultrasound therapy facilitates the recovery of acute pressure-induced conduction block of the median nerve in rabbits. Muscle Nerve 26(3):356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong CZ, Liu HH, Yu J (1988) Ultrasound thermotherapy effect on the recovery of nerve conduction in experimental compression neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:410–414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebenbichler GR, Resch KL, Nicolakis P, Wiesinger GF, Uhl F, Ghanem AH, Fialka V (1998) Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised “sham” controlled trial. BMJ 316(7133):731–735

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ekim A, Çolak E (2008) Ultrasound treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome: a placebo controlled study. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 54:96–101

    Google Scholar 

  23. Page MJ, O’Connor D, Pitt V, Massy WN (2013) Therapeutic ultrasound for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28(3):CD009601. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009601.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kramer JF (1985) Effect of therapeutic ultrasound intensity on subcutaneous tissue temperature and ulnar nerve conduction velocity. Am J Phys Med 64(1):1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Irvine J, Chong SL, Amirjani N, Chan KM (2004) Double-blind randomized controlled trial of low-level laser therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 30(2):182–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yagci I, Elmas O, Akcan E, Ustun I, Gunduz OH, Guven Z (2009) Comparison of splinting and splinting plus low-level laser therapy in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 28:1059–1065. doi:10.1007/s10067-009-1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lopes-Martins R, Penna SC, Joensen J, Iversen VV, Bjordal JM (2007) Low level laser therapy (LLLT) in inflammatory and rheumatic diseases: a review of therapeutic mechanisms. Curr Rheumatol Rev 3:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jan M, Bjordal JM, Lopes-Martins RA, Joensen J, Couppe C, Ljunggren AE, Stergioulas A, Johnson MI (2008) A systematic review with procedural assessments and meta-analysis of low level laser therapy in lateral elbow tendinopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Dis 9:75. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashmi JT, Huang YY, Sharma SK, Kurup DB, De Taboada L, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR (2010) Effect of pulsing in low-level light therapy. Lasers Surg Med 42(6):450–466. doi:10.1002/lsm.20950

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feyza Unlu Ozkan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozkan, F.U., Saygı, E.K., Senol, S. et al. New treatment alternatives in the ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: ultrasound and low-level laser therapy. Acta Neurol Belg 115, 355–360 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-014-0377-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-014-0377-9

Keywords

Navigation