Skip to main content

Sensitivity and specificity of Ankara University Cerebral Dominance Inventory in comparison with the Wada test

Abstract

We aimed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Ankara University Cerebral Dominance Inventory (AUCDI) in determining left cerebral dominance compared with the Wada test. The AUCDI and Wada test were applied to 49 patients referred to Ankara University for epilepsy surgery. Hand, foot and ‘total’ preference scores were specified according to the results of the inventory. Thirty-eight of the patients had left cerebral dominance and 11 had atypical cerebral dominance for language. 86 % of the patients were right-handed and 43 % were right-footed. When compared with the results of the Wada test, the sensitivity of the AUCDI for each ‘total preference’, and hand and foot preference was 90, 95 and 50 % and specificity was 46, 46 and 82 %, respectively. The percentage of right-footed patients was low when compared with the other studies. This difference might result from the method used for assessing foot preference by the actual demonstration of the task rather than just asking about the performance. The AUCDI was found to be sensitive in terms of ‘total preference’ and hand preference, and specific in terms of foot preference for determining the left hemisphere dominance in patients preferring the right side. It was a cheap and noninvasive alternative to the Wada test, appropriate for clinical bedside evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Guberman AH, Bruni J (1999) Diagnosis. In: Guberman AH, Bruni J (eds) Essentials of clinical epilepsy, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, United States, pp 11–50

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wellmer J, Fernández G, Linke DB et al (2005) Unilateral intracarotid amobarbital procedure for language lateralization. Epilepsia 46:1764–1772

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brázdil M, Zákopcan J, Kuba R et al (2003) Atypical hemispheric language dominance in left temporal lobe epilepsy as a result of the reorganization of language functions. Epilepsy Behav 4:414–419

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saltzman-Benaiah J, Scott K, Smith ML (2003) Factors associated with atypical speech representation in children with intractable epilepsy. Neuropsychologia 41:1967–1974

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knecht S, Deppe M, Ebner A et al (1998) Noninvasive determination of language lateralization by functional transcranial Doppler sonography. A comparison with the Wada test. Stroke 29:82–86

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meador KJ (2004) Ambiguous language in Wada evaluations. Epilepsia 45(Suppl. 4):S24–S25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schachter SC (1997) Handedness measurement and correlation with brain structure. In: Schahter SC, Devinsky O (eds) Behavioral neurology and the legacy of Norman Geschwind. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 257–270

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elias LJ, Bryden MP (1998) Footedness is a better predictor of language lateralization than handedness. Laterality 3:41–51

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Strauss E, Satz P, Wada J (1990) An examination of the crowding hypothesis in epileptic patients who have undergone the carotid amytal test. Neuropsychologia 28:1221–1227

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rassmussen T, Milner B (1977) The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 299:355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Risse GL, Gates JR, Fangman MC (1997) A reconsideration of bilateral language representation based on the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Brain Cogn 33:118–132

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coren S (1993) Measurement of handedness via self-report: the relationship between brief and extended inventories. Percept Mot Skills 76:1035–1042

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Annett M (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 61:303–321

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman LJ, Chapman JP (1987) The measurement of handedness. Brain Cogn 6:175–183

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nalcacı E, Kalaycıoglu C, Guneş E et al (2002) El tercihi anketinin gecerlik ve guvenilirligi. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 13:99–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watson GS, Pusakulich RL, Ward JP et al (1998) Handedness, footedness and language laterality: evidence from Wada testing. Laterality 3:323–330

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabbard C, Hart S (1996) A question of foot dominance. J Gen Psychol 123:289–296

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reiss M, Reiss G (1997) Lateral preferences in a German population. Percept Mot Skills 85:569–574

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Strauss E, Wada J (1983) Lateral preferences and cerebral speech dominance. Cortex 19:165–177

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilliam FG, Brenda A (2011) Identifying epilepsy surgery candidates in the outpatient clinic. Epilepsy Behav 20:156–159

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No financial disclosure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nesrin Helvacı Yılmaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yılmaz, N.H., Bingol, A.P. Sensitivity and specificity of Ankara University Cerebral Dominance Inventory in comparison with the Wada test. Acta Neurol Belg 114, 11–14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-013-0212-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-013-0212-8

Keywords

  • Cerebral dominance
  • Handedness inventory
  • Laterality
  • Wada test