Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the cognitive functions in patients with chronic renal failure before and after renal transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic renal failure (CRF) and dialysis treatment affect central nervous system and studies have shown that neurocognitive dysfunctions are caused by CRF and dialysis treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in cognitive functions of CRF patients after renal transplantation. Neurocognitive functions of 40 renal transplantation patients aged 18–65 years were determined before, 6 and 12 months after transplantation between 2008 and 2010 using neuropsychological tests. Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RVLT), Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT), ADAS-cog Test, Stroop Test (ST), Digit Span Test (DST), and Trail Making Test (TMT) were applied. The test results were statistically compared taking into consideration the patients’ levels of education, age, gender, donor type, duration of dialysis, dialysis type, and duration of CRF. Neuropsychological test results statistically significantly increased in all the patients after renal transplantation (p < 0.05). The female patients’ RVLT test results were statistically higher than the test results of the male patients (p < 0.05). DST, RCFT, RVLT, and (Verbal Fluency Test) VFT results were statistically higher in the patients who were 33 years old or younger (p < 0.05). The patients with high school and college education had statistically significantly higher results in all the tests when compared with the patients that were elementary school graduates (p < 0.05). DST forward task, ST, and RVLT results of the patients, who had received dialysis treatment for 1 year or less, were found to be statistically higher than the results of the patients who had received dialysis for more than 1 year (p < 0.05). The results of RCFT, RVLT, DST backward task, and VFT were statistically higher in the peritoneal dialysis patients than in the hemodialysis patients (p < 0.05). The donor type and the duration of CRF had no significant effects on the results (p > 0.05). The results of this study showed significant improvement in attention, memory, executive functions, pace of data processing and language functions in CRF patients after renal transplantation, as proven with neuropsychological tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Petersen RC (2003) Essentials of the proper diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and major subtypes of dementia. Mayo Clin Proc 78:1290–1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Madero M, Gul A, Sarnak MJ (2008) Cognitive function in chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial 21(1):29–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brouns R, De Deyn PP (2004) Neurological complications in renal failure: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107(1):1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mavioglu H, Gedizlioglu M, Akyel S et al (2006) The validity and reliability of Turkish version of Alzheimer disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (Adas-Cog) in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer disease and normal subjects. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 21(3):259–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oktem O (1994) Neuropsychological tests and neuropsychological evaluation. Turkish J Psychol 9(33):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ozdeniz Varan E, Oktem O, Gurvit H (2007) Rey complex figure test and recognition trial (RCFT): norm determination study on Turkish adult sample. Turkish J Neurol 13(6):387–394

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cangoz B, Karakoc E, Selekler K (2007) Standardization study of “Trial Making Test” for Turkish adults and elderly people (ages 50 and over). Turkish J Geriatr 10(2):73–82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karakas S, Erdogan E, Sak L (1999) Stroop test TBAG form: standardization for Turkish culture, reliability and validity. Turkish J Clin Psychiatry 2:75–88

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karakas S, Yalın A (1995) Standardization study of visual and auditory digit span test B form in 13–54 year old patients. Turkish J Psychol 10(34):20–31

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bingol A, Eroglu G, Haktanir I (1994) Standardization study of verbal fluency skill in Turkish population. 15th National Neurology Congress, Adana, Turkey

  11. Burn DJ, Bates D (1998) Neurology and the kidney. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 65:810–821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pereira AA, Weiner DE, Scott T et al (2005) Cognitive function in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 45(3):448–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Burrows NR et al (2009) Comprehensive public health strategies for preventing the development, progression and complications of CKD: report of an expert panel convened by the centers for disease control and prevention. Am J Kidney Dis 53(3):522–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pliskin NH, Yurk HM, Ho LT et al (1996) Neurocognitive function in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 49:1435–1440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murray AM, Tupper DE, Knopman DS et al (2006) Cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is common. Neurology 67:216–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vos PF, Zilch O, Jennekens-Schinkel A et al (2006) Effect of short daily home hemodialysis on quality of life, cognitive functioning and the electroencephalogram. Nephrol Dial Transpl 21:2529–2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendley SR, Zelko FA (1999) Improvement in specific aspects of neurocognitive performance in children after renal transplantation. Kidney Int 56:318–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Griva K, Hansraj S, Thompson D et al (2004) Neuropsychological performance after kidney transplantation: a comparison between transplant types and in relation to dialysis and normative data. Nephrol Dial Transpl 19:1866–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Griva K, Thompson D, Jayasena D et al (2006) Cognitive functioning pre- to post-kidney transplantation—a prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transpl 21:3275–3282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kramer L, Madl C, Stockenhuber F et al (1996) Beneficial effect of renal transplantation on cognitive brain function. Kidney Int 49:833–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Teschan PE, Ginn HE, Bourne JR et al (1976) Neurobehavioral responses to “middle molecule” dialysis and transplantation. Transactions Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 22:190–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harciarek M, Biedunkiewicz B, Lichodziejewska-Niemierko M et al (2006) Cognitive function in dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease awaiting kidney transplant. Acta Neuropsychologica 4:125–139

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lacerda SS, Guimaro MS, Prade CV et al (2008) Neuropsychological assessment in kidney and liver transplantation candidates. Transpl Proc 40:729–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harciarek M, Biedunkiewicz B, Lichodziejewska-Niemierko M et al (2009) Cognitive performance before and after kidney transplantation: a prospective controlled study of adequately dialyzed patients with end-stage renal disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 15:684–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Widjicks EF (2001) Neurotoxity of immunosuppressive drugs. Liver Transpl 7:937–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yildiz Kaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaya, Y., Ozturkeri, O.A., Benli, U.S. et al. Evaluation of the cognitive functions in patients with chronic renal failure before and after renal transplantation. Acta Neurol Belg 113, 147–155 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-012-0139-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-012-0139-5

Keywords

Navigation