Accurate segmentation of the breast tissue is a significant challenge in the analysis of breast MR images, especially analysis of breast images with low contrast. Most of the existing methods for breast segmentation are semi-automatic and limited in their ability to achieve accurate results. This is because of difficulties in removing landmarks from noisy magnetic resonance images (MRI). Especially, when tumour is imaged for scanning, how to isolate the tumour region from chest will directly affect the accuracy for tumour to be detected. Due to low intensity levels and the close connection between breast and chest portion in MRIs, this study proposes an innovative, fully automatic and fast segmentation approach which combines histogram with inverse Gaussian gradient for morphology snakes, along with extended Stein’s unbiased risk estimator (eSURE) applied for unsupervised learning of deep neural network Gaussian denoisers, aimed at accurate identification of landmarks such as chest and breast.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Fass L, et al. Imaging and cancer: a review. Mol Oncol. 2008;2(2):115–52.
Rivera-Franco MM, Leon-Rodriguez E, Delays in breast cancer detection and treatment in developing countries. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2018; 12: 1178223417752677.
Wernli KJ, DeMartini WB, Ichikawa L, Lehman CD, Onega T, Kerlikowske K, Henderson LM, Geller BM, Hofmann M, Yankaskas BC. the breast cancer surveillance consortium, patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(1):125–32.
Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(8):500–10.
Nover AB, Jagtap S, Anjum W, Yegingil H, Shih WY, Shih W-H, Brooks AD, Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2009; Volume 2009, Article ID 902326
Berry E, A practical approach to medical image processing, CRC Press, 2019
Yin XX, Hadjiloucas S, Chen JH, Zhang Y, Wu JL, Su MY. Tensor based multichannel reconstruction for breast tumours identification from DCE-MRIs. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0176133.
Yin XX, Hadjiloucas S, Zhang Y. Pattern classification of medical images: computer aided diagnosis. Cham: Springer; 2017.
Yin XX, Ng BWH, Yang Q, Pitman A, Ramamohanarao K, Abbott D. Anatomical landmark localization in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012;50(1):91–101.
Nahid A-A, Kong Y, Involvement of machine learning for breast cancer image classification: a survey, computational and mathematical methods in medicine, Volume 2017, Article ID 3781951, 2017
Zilong Hu, Tang J, Wang Z, Zhang K, Zhang L, Sun Q. Deep learning for image-based cancer detection and diagnosis − A survey. Pattern Recogn. 2018;83:134–49.
Razzak MI, Naz S, Zaib A, Deep learning for medical image processing: overview, challenges and the future. In: Dey N, Ashour A, Borra S. (eds) Classification in BioApps. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 26. Springer, Cham 2018
Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L. Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology. 2019;292(3):520–36.
Yin XX, Zhang Y, Cao J, Wu JL, Hadjiloucas S. Exploring the complementarity of THz pulse imaging and DCE-MRIs: toward a unified multi-channel classification and a deep learning framework. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;137:87–114.
Li X, Jiang D, Shi Y, Li W, Segmentation of MR image using local and global region based geodesic model. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 14, Article number:8 2015
Guo M, Wang Z, Ma Y, Xie W. Review of parametric active contour models in image processing. J Converg Inform Technol (JCIT). 2013;8(11):248–58.
Kass M, Witkin A. D. Terzopoulos, Snake: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis. 1987;1:321–31.
Cohen LD, Cohen I. Finite-element methods for active contour models and balloons for 2-D and 3-D images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1993;15(11):1131–47.
Xu Y. Snakes shapes and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(3):359–69.
Li B, Acton ST. Active contour external force using vector field convolution for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007;16(8):2096–106.
Osher S, Sethian JA. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys. 1988;79(1):12–49.
Whitaker RT. A level-set approach to 3D reconstruction from range data. Int J Comput Vis. 1998;29(3):203–31.
Chan TF, Vese LA. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2001;10(2):266–77.
Dolz J, Kirişli HA, Fechter T, Karnitzki S, Oehlke O, Nestle U et al. Interactive contour delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy: clinical evaluation on NSCLC patients, Med Phys, 43(5), Art Number 2569, 2016.
Liu S, Peng Y. A local region-based Chan-Vese model for image segmentation. Pattern Recogn. 2012;45(7):2769–79.
Xu J, Gong L, Wang G, et al. Convolutional neural network initialized active contour model with adaptive ellipse fitting for nuclear segmentation on breast histopathological images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham, Wash). 2019;6(1):017501.
Guo X, Schwartz LH, Zhao B. Automatic liver segmentation by integrating fully convolutional networks into active contour models. Med Phys. 2019;46(10):4455–69.
Chen X, Williams BM, Vallabhaneni SR, Czanner G, Williams R, Zheng Y, Learning active contour models for medical image segmentation. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 11624–11632.
Shannon C, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press; 1998.
Vaishali S, Rao KK, Rao GVS, A review on noise reduction methods for brain MRI images. 2015 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Engineering Systems, Guntur, 2015, pp. 363–365.
Starck JL, Candes EJ, Donoho DL. The curvelet transform for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2002;11(6):670–84.
Singh S, Wadhwani S. Genetic algorithm based medical image denoising through sub band adaptive thresholding. Int J Sci Engineer Technol Res. 2015;4(5):1481–5.
Sharif M, Jaffara MA, Mahmood MT. Optimal composite morphological supervised filter for image denoising using genetic programming: application to magnetic resonance images. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2014;31:78–89.
Aharon M, Elad M, Bruckstein AM. K-SVD: an algorithm for designing over complete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2006;54:4311–22.
Binh NT, Khare A. Multilevel threshold based image denoising in curvelet domain. J Comput Sci Technol. 2010;25(3):632–40.
Pereira DC, Ramos RP, Nascimento MZ. Segmentation and detection of breast cancer in mammograms combining wavelet analysis and genetic algorithm. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;114:88–101.
Bermudez C, Plassard AJ, Davis LT, Newton AT, Resnick SM, Landman BA. Learning implicit brain MRI manifolds with deep learning. Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing, 2018; 105741L.
Jiang D, Dou W, Vosters L, Xu X, Sun Y, Tan T. Denoising of 3D magnetic resonance images with multi-channel residual learning of convolutional neural network. Jpn J Radiol. 2018;36:566–74.
Rao GS, Srinivas B. De-noising of MRI Brain Tumor image using Deep Convolutional Neural Network, 2019
Balafar MA. New spatial based MRI image de-noising algorithm. Artif Intell Rev. 2013;39(3):225–35.
Pantelic RS, et al. The discriminative bilateral filter: an enhanced denoising filter for electron microscopy data. J Struct Biol. 2006;155(3):395–408.
Sawant AR, et al. Adaptive median filter algorithm to remove impulse noise in x-ray and CT images and speckle in ultrasound images. Int Soc Opt Photon Med Imaging. 1999;99(1999):1263–74.
Zhussip M, Soltanayev S, Chun S. Extending Stein’s unbiased risk estimator to train deep denoisers with correlated pairs of noisy images. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst. 2019;32:1465–75.
Li M, Zhang L, Xu X-J, Shi Z, Zhao X-M. CT and MRI features of tumors and tumor-like lesions in the abdominal wall. Quant Imaging Med Surgery. 2019;9(11):41–58.
Saini AK, Bhadauria HS, Annapurna S, A survey of noise removal methodologies for lung cancer diagnosis. IEEE Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT). 2016; 673–678.
Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G. Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vis. 1997;22:61–79.
A. Medeiros, M. Guimarães, S. Peixoto, L. Santos, C. Barros, E. Rebouças, V.H.C. Albuquerque, & P.P. Filho. A new fast morphological geodesic active contour method for lung CT image segmentation. measurement. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.078.
Osher S, Sethian JA. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on hamilton-jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys. 1988;79:12–49.
Alvarez L, Baumela L, Henriquez P, Marquez-Neila P, “Morphological snakes,” in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010, pp. 2197–2202.
Marquez-Neila P, Baumela L, Alvarez L. A morphological approach to curvature-based evolution of curves and surfaces. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2014;36(1):2–17.
Gallego-Ortiz C, Martel AL. Automatic atlas-based segmentation of the breast in MRI for 3D breast volume computation. Med Phys. 2012;39:5835–48.
Fooladivanda A, Shokouhi SB, Ahmadinejad N. Localized-atlas-based segmentation of breast MRI in a decision making framework. Australas Phys Eng Sci. 2017;40(1):69–84.
Doran SJ, Hipwell JH, Denholm R, Eiben B, Busana M, Hawkes DJ, Leach MOD, Silva IDS. Breast MRI segmentation for density estimation: do difffferent methods give the same results and how much do difffferences matter? Med Phys. 2017;44(9):4573–92.
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, XX., Jian, Y., Zhang, Y. et al. Automatic breast tissue segmentation in MRIs with morphology snake and deep denoiser training via extended Stein’s unbiased risk estimator. Health Inf Sci Syst 9, 16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-021-00143-x
- Image segmentation
- Inverse Gaussian gradient
- Morphology snakes
- Breast cancer
- Adaptive histogram equalization
- Extended Stein’s unbiased risk estimator