Comparative study of multiclass classification methods on light microscopic images for hepatic schistosomiasis fibrosis diagnosis
- 36 Downloads
Hepatic schistosomiasis is a prolonged disease resulting mainly from the solvable egg antigen of schistosomiasis infection due to the host’s granulomatous cell-mediated immune. Irreversible fibrosis results from the progress of the schistosomal hepatopathy. Sensitive diagnosis of this disease is based on the investigation of the microscopy images, liver tissues, and egg identification. Early diagnosis of schistosomiasis at its initial infection stage is vital to avoid egg-induced irreparable pathological reactions. Typically, there are several classification approaches that can be used for liver fibrosis staging. However, it is unclear which approaches can achieve high accuracy for analyzing and intelligently classifying the liver microscopic images. Consequently, this work aims to study the performance of the different machine learning classifiers for accurate fibrosis level staging of granuloma, namely cellular, fibrocellular and fibrotic granulomas as well as the normal samples. The classifiers include a multi-layer perceptron neural network, a decision tree, discriminant analysis, support vector machine (SVM), nearest neighbor, and the ensemble of classifiers. The statistical features of the microscopic images are extracted from the different fibrosis levels of granuloma, namely cellular, fibrocellular and fibrotic granulomas as well as the normal samples. The results established that the maximum achieved classification accuracies of value 90% were achieved using the subspace discriminant ensemble, the quadratic SVM, the linear SVM, or the linear discriminant classifiers. However, the linear discriminant classifier can be considered the superior classifier as it realized the best area under the curve of value 0.96 during the classification of the cellular granuloma as well as the fibro-cellular granuloma fibrosis levels.
KeywordsHepatic schistosomiasis Fibrosis Statistical features Ensemble classifier Decision tree Discriminant analysis Support vector machine Nearest neighbor
The authors are thankful to Dr. Dalia Salah Ashour and Dr. Dina M. Abou Rayia, Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt, for performing the parasitology part of the study and providing us with the used microscopic images dataset at the different fibrosis stages as well as the normal case.
- 10.Mika S, Ratsch G, Weston J, Scholkopf B, Mullers K.R. Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE signal processing society workshop on neural networks for signal processing IX, 1999. p. 41–48.Google Scholar
- 17.Boiman O, Shechtman E, Irani M. In defense of nearest-neighbor based image classification. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE; 2008. p. 1–8.Google Scholar
- 19.Sarkaleh AK, Poorahangaryan F, Zanj B, Karami A. A neural network based system for Persian sign language recognition. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on signal and image processing applications (ICSIPA). IEEE; 2009. p. 145–149Google Scholar
- 20.Dietterich T.G. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: International workshop on multiple classifier systems. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 1–15Google Scholar
- 23.Panahi N, Shayesteh MG, Mihandoost S, Varghahan BZ. Recognition of different datasets using PCA, LDA, and various classifiers. In: 2011 5th international conference on application of information and communication technologies (AICT). IEEE; 2011. pp. 1–5.Google Scholar