Advertisement

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 163–176 | Cite as

A simple human vulnerability index to climate change hazards for Pakistan

  • Fazal Ali KhanEmail author
  • Ali Salman
Open Access
Article

Abstract

This article explores the spatial pattern of vulnerability to climate change hazards in Pakistan by developing a Human Vulnerability Index (HVI). For this purpose, we use Population Census 1998 and Agriculture Census 2000 data. The HVI places the 103 districts of Pakistan in rank order and looks at whether there is a correlation between human vulnerability and exposure to disaster of the districts with respect to climate change hazards such as floods. The HVI is further validated using an independent flood recovery data set. The study found that the HVI is a useful tool for identifying vulnerable regions and districts for resource allocation. But the HVI is a poor tool for vulnerability assessment at community and household levels. For this purpose we used logistic regression analysis, which indicates that the adult literacy rate, ownership of livestock, and access to electricity are the three (out of six) key variables that play a critical positive role in recovery after the 2010 floods. The primary data collected from households also reveal that the 2010 Pakistan floods have equally affecte d standing crops, livestock, and house structures. More than two-thirds of sample households had rebuilt their house structures, whereas livestock recovery was negligible since the floods. We also found that the 2010 floods affected some of the poverty regions of the country, but that there is a very weak systematic correlation between human vulnerability and disaster exposure.

Keywords

climate change Pakistan index validation flood vulnerability Human Vulnerability Index (HVI) 

References

  1. Acosta-Michlik, L. 2005. Intervulnerability Assessment, Shifting Foci From Generic Indices to Adaptive Agents in Assessing Vulnerability to Global Environmental Chnage (A pilot Project in the Philippines). Louvain-la-Nauve, Belgium: Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Department of Geography.Google Scholar
  2. ADB (Asian Develoment Bank), WB (World Bank), and GOP (Goverment of Pakistan). 2010. Pakistan Floods Damage and Need Assessment. Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  3. Adger, W. N. 2006. Vulnerability. Science Direct 16(3): 268–281.Google Scholar
  4. Arif, G. M., N. Iqbal, and S. Farooq. 2010. The 2010 Flood and Poverty in Pakistan: A Preliminary District-Level Analysis. Background paper prepared for the Conference on the Environments of the Poor, 24–26 Nevember 2010, New Delhi. http://www.scribd.com/doc/42890203/Flood-and-Poverty-in-Pakistan-A-Preliminary-Analysis-at-District-level-of-Systemic-and-Disaster-Induced-Causes-of-Poverty-paper 33.
  5. Birkmann, J. 2006. Measuring Vulnerability to Promote Disaster-Resilient Societies: Conceptual Frameworks and Definitions. In Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies, edited by J. Birkmann, 9–54. Tokyo: United Nations Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cardona, O. D. 2005. System of Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Program for Latin America and the Carribean: Summary Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, G. E., S. C. Moser, S. J Ratik, K. Dow, W. B. Meyer, S. Emani, W. Jin, J. X. Kasperson, R. E. Kasperson, and H. E Schwarz. 1998. Assessing the Vulnerablity of Coastal Communities to Extreme Storms: The case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Stretegies for Global Change 3(1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cross, J. A. 2001. Megacities and Samll Towns: Differnt Perspectives on Hazard Vulnerability. Environmental Hazard 3(2): 63–80.Google Scholar
  9. Cutter, S. L. 1996. Vulnerablity to Environmental Hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20(4): 529–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutter, S. L., J. K. Mitchell, and M. S. Scott. 2000. Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(4): 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, B. 2002. Is It Possible to Avoid a Lemon? Reflections on Choosing a Poverty Mapping Method. Agriculture in Economic Development Service, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  12. Dwyer, A., C. Zoppou, O. Nielsen, S. Day, and S. Roberts. 2004. Quantifying Social Vulnerability: A Methodology for Identifying those at Risk to Natural Hazards. Canberra City: Geoscience Australia Record.Google Scholar
  13. Fekete, A. 2009. Validation of a Social Vulnerability Index in Context to River-Floods in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9(2): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Government of Pakistan. 1998. Population and Housing Census. Statistics Division, Population Census Organization.Google Scholar
  15. —. 2000. Agriculture Census. Statistics Division, Agricultural Census Organization.Google Scholar
  16. ISET (Institute for Social Science and Environmental Transition) and RSPN (Rural Support Programmes Network. 2011–2012. Indus Flood Research Project (IFRP). Unpublished.Google Scholar
  17. Jamal, H., A. J. Khan, I. A. Toor, and N. Amir. 2003. Mapping the Spatial Deprivation of Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 42(2): 91–111.Google Scholar
  18. Kropp, J. P., A. Block, F. Reusswig, K. Zickfeld, and H. J. Schellnhuber. 2006. Semiquantitative Assessment of Regional Climate Vulnerability: The North-Rhine Westphalia Study. Climate Change 76(3–4): 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumpulainen, S. 2006. Vulnerablility Concepts in Hazard and Risk Assessment. In Natural and Technological Haszards and Risks Affecting the Spatial Development of European Regions, edited by P. Schmidt-Thomé, 65–74. Geological Survey of Finland Special Paper 42. Helsinki: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies/Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
  20. Maple Croft. 2010. Big Economies of the Future-Bangladesh, India, Philippines, Vietnam and Pakistan-Most at Risk from Climate Change. http://maplecroft.com/about/news/ccvi.html.
  21. McCarthy, J. J., O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken, and K. S. White. 2001. Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerablity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mustafa, D. 1998. Structural Causes of Vulnerability to Flood Hazard in Pakistan. Economic Geography 74(3): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mustafa, D., S. Ahmed, E. Saroch, and H. Bell. 2011. Pinning Down Vulnerability: From Narratives to Numbers. Disasters 35(1): 62–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rygel, L., D. O’sullivan, and B. Yarnal. 2006. A Method for Constructing a Social Vulnerability Index: An Application to Hurricane Storm Surges in a Developed Country. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(3): 741–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salman, A., and A. Khalil. 2009. Economic Freedom in Pakistan-Sub National Index. Islamabad: Development Pool Pakistan.Google Scholar
  26. Said, F., T. Musaddiq, and M. Mahmud. 2011. Macro Level Determinants of Poverty: Investigation through Poverty Mapping of Districts of Pakistan. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting and Conference of Pakistan Society of Development Economists, 13–15Google Scholar
  27. Tapsell. S. M., E. C. Penning-Rowsell, S. M. Tunstall, and T. L. Wilson. 2002. Vulnerability to Flooding: Health and Social Dimensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathimatical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 360(1796): 1511–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UNOCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs). 2011. Pakistan Floods 2011. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Full%20Report_737.pdf.
  29. Wu, S. Y., B. Yarnal, and A. Fisher. 2002. Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Sea-Level Rise: A Case Study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Climate Research 22: 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weichselgartner, J. 2002. About the Capacity to Be Wounded: The Need to Link Disaster Mitigation and Sustainable Development. In Extreme Naturereignisse-Folgen, Vorsorge, Werkzeuge, edited by G. Tetzlaff, T. Trautmann, and K. L. Radtke, 150–158. Zweites Forum Katastrophevorsorge, 24–26 September, Leipzig. Bonn: German Committee for Disaster Reduction (DKKV).Google Scholar
  31. Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2002. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerablity and Disasters. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Yarnal, B. 2007. Vulnerability and All that Jazz: Addressing Vulnerability in New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina. Technology in Society 29(2): 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Science and Economics DepartmentShaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST)IslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Rural Support Programmes Network (RSPN)IslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Development PoolIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations