Advertisement

Biological Theory

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 21–29 | Cite as

Code Biology, Peircean Biosemiotics, and Rosen’s Relational Biology

  • Marcello BarbieriEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The classical theories of the genetic code (the stereochemical theory and the coevolution theory) claimed that its coding rules were determined by chemistry—either by stereochemical affinities or by metabolic reactions—but the experimental evidence has revealed a totally different reality: it has shown that any codon can be associated with any amino acid, thus proving that there is no necessary link between them. The rules of the genetic code, in other words, obey the laws of physics and chemistry but are not determined by them. They are arbitrary, or conventional, rules. The result is that the genetic code is not a metaphorical entity, as implied by the classical theories, but a real code, because it is precisely the presence of arbitrary rules that divides a code from all other natural processes. In the past 20 years, furthermore, various independent discoveries have shown that many other organic codes exist in living systems, which means that the genetic code has not been an isolated case in the history of life. These experimental facts have one outstanding theoretical implication: they imply that in addition to the concept of information we must introduce in biology the concept of meaning, because we cannot have codes without meaning or meaning without codes. The problem is that at present we have two different theoretical frameworks for that purpose: one is Code Biology, where meaning is the result of coding, and the other is Peircean biosemiotics, where meaning is the result of interpretation. Recently, however, a third party has entered the scene, and it has been proposed that Robert Rosen’s relational biology can provide a bridge between Code Biology and Peircean biosemiotics.

Keywords

Biosemiotics Code Biology Information Interpretation Meaning Organic codes Peirce Relational biology Rosen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am most grateful to Jan-Hendrik Hofmeyr, to Nikola Štambuk, and to an anonymous referee for comments that have allowed me to substantially improve the first version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M et al (2007) Molecular biology of the cell, 5th edn. Garland, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnellos A, Bruni LE, El-Hani CN, Collier J (2012) Anticipatory functions, digital-analog forms and biosemiotics. Biosemiotics 5(3):331–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbieri M (2002) Has biosemiotics come of age? Semiotica 139:283–295Google Scholar
  4. Barbieri M (2003) The organic codes. An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbieri M (2006) Life and semiosis: the real nature of information and meaning. Semiotica 158:233–254Google Scholar
  6. Barbieri M (2011) A mechanistic model of meaning. Biosemiotics 4(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbieri M (2015) Code biology. A new science of life. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbieri M (2016) What is information? Philoso Trans A R Soc 374:20150060.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bechtel W (2007) Biological mechanisms: organized to maintain autonomy. In: Boogerd F, Bruggerman F, Hofmeyr JH, Westerhoff HV (eds) Systems biology: philosophical foundations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brier S, Joslyn C (2012) What does it take to produce interpretation? Biosemiotics 6(1):143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckeridge MS, De Souza AP (2014) Breaking the “Glycomic Code” of cell wall polysaccharides may improve second-generation bioenergy production from biomass. Bioenergy Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9460-6 Google Scholar
  12. Budisa N (2004) Prolegomena to future efforts on genetic code engineering by expanding its amino acid repertoire. Angew Chem Int Ed 43:3387–3428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Budisa N (2014) Xenobiology, new-to-nature synthetic cells and genetic firewall. Curr Org Chem 18:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buratti E, Baralle M, Baralle FE (2006) Defective splicing, disease and therapy: searching for master checkpoints in exon definition. Nucleic Acids Res 34:3494–3510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crick F (1981) Life itself. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. De Beule J (2014) Sketch for a theory of evolution based on coding. Biosemiotics 7(2):181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Beule J, Hovig E, Benson M (2011) Introducing dynamics into the field of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics 4(1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farina A, Pieretti N (2014) Acoustic codes in action in a soundscape context. Biosemiotics 7(2):321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fu XD (2004) Towards a splicing code. Cell 119:736–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gabius H-J (2000) Biological information transfer beyond the genetic code: the sugar code. Naturwissenschaften 87:108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gabius H-J (2009) The sugar code. Fundamentals of glycosciences. Wiley-Blackwell, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  22. Gimona M (2008) Protein linguistics and the modular code of the cytoskeleton. In: Barbieri M (ed) The codes of life: the rules of macroevolution. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Görlich D, Dittrich P (2013) Molecular codes in biological and chemical reaction networks. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54,694,  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054694
  24. Görlich D, Artmann S, Dittrich P (2011) Cells as semantic systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 1810(10):914–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartman MCT, Josephson K, Lin C-W, Szostak JW (2007) An expanded set of amino acid analogs for the ribosomal translation of unnatural peptides. PLoS ONE 2(10):e972.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hofmeyr J-HS (2007) The biochemical factory that autonomously fabricates itself: a systems-biological view of the living cell. In: Boogard F, Bruggeman F, Hofmeyr J, Westerhoff H (eds) Towards a philosophy of systems biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 217–242Google Scholar
  27. Hofmeyr J-HS (2017) Basic biological anticipation. In: Poli R (ed) Handbook of anticipation: theoretical and applied aspects of the use of future in decision making. Springer, Cham, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  28. Hofmeyr J-HS (2018) Causation, constructors and codes. BioSystems 164:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holland JA (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopfield JJ (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2554–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hou Y-M, Schimmel P (1988) A simple structural feature is a major determinant of the identity of a transfer RNA. Nature 333:140–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Janke C (2014) The tubulin code: molecular components, readout mechanisms, and functions. J Cell Biol 206(4):461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kohonen T (1984) Self-organization and associative memory. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Komander D, Rape M (2012) The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem 81:203–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kühn S, Hofmeyr J-HS (2014) Is the “Histone Code” an organic code? Biosemiotics 7(2):203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kull K (ed) (2001) Jakob von Uexküll: a paradigm for biology and semiotics. Semiotica, vol 134(1/4). Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Levin M (2014) Endogenous bioelectrical networks store non-genetic patterning information during development and regeneration. J Physiol 592(11):2295–2305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ling J, O’Donoghue P, Söll D (2015) Genetic code flexibility in microorganisms: novel mechanisms and impact on bacterial physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:707–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Machamer P, Darden L, Craver CF (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philos Sci 67(1):1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1086/392759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maraldi NM (2008) A lipid-based code in nuclear signalling. In: Barbieri M (ed) The codes of life: the rules of macroevolution. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realisation of the living. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maynard Smith J (1986) The problems of biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Nicholson D (2012) The concept of mechanism in biology. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C: Stud Hist Philos Biological Biomed Sci 43(1):152–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peirce CS (1906) The basis of Pragmaticism. In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P (eds) The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. vols I–VI. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 1931–1935Google Scholar
  45. Posner R, Robering K, Sebeok TA (1997) Semiotik/semiotics: a handbook on the sign-theoretical foundations of nature and culture, vol 1. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosen R (1991) Life itself. A comprehensive enquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosen R (2012) Anticipatory systems. Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations. Springer, New York [1st edn (1985) Pergamon Press, Ontario]Google Scholar
  48. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Schimmel P (1987) Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases: general scheme of structure–function relationship in the polypeptides and recognition of tRNAs. Annu Rev Biochem 56:125–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schimmel P, Giegé R, Moras D, Yokoyama S (1993) An operational RNA code for amino acids and possible relationship to genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8763–8768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strahl BD, Allis D (2000) The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tazi J, Bakkour N, Stamm S (2009) Alternative splicing and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1792:14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomkins MG (1975) The metabolic code. Science 189:760–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trifonov EN (1989) The multiple codes of nucleotide sequences. Bull Math Biol 51:417–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trifonov EN (1996) Interfering contexts of regulatory sequence elements. Cabios 12:423–429Google Scholar
  56. Trifonov EN (1999) Elucidating sequence codes: three codes for evolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 870:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tseng AS, Levin M (2013) Cracking the bioelectric code. Probing endogenous ionic controls of pattern formation. Communicative Integrative Biology 6(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turner BM (2000) Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. BioEssays 22:836–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner BM (2002) Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell 111:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner BM (2007) Defining an epigenetic code. Nat Cell Biol 9:2–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vega F (2018) A critique of Barbieri’s Code Biology through Rosen’s relational biology: reconciling Barbieri’s biosemiotics with Peircean biosemiotics. Biol Theory.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-018-0302-1 Google Scholar
  62. Verhey KJ, Gaertig J (2007) The tubulin code. Cell Cycle 6(17):2152–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. von Neumann J (1966) In: Burks A (ed) The theory of self-reproducing automata. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang Z, Burge C (2008) Splicing regulation: from a part list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code. RNA 14:802–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Morphology and EmbryologyUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations