Biological Theory

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 67–71 | Cite as

Three Modes of Evolution by Natural Selection and Drift: A New or an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis?

Commentary

Abstract

According to sources both in print and at a recent meeting, evolutionary theory is currently undergoing change which some would characterize as a New Synthesis, and others as an Extended Synthesis. This article argues that the important changes involve recognizing that there are three means by which evolutionary change can be initiated (genetically, ecologically, and developmentally) and three corresponding modes of evolutionary drift. It compares the three and goes on to discuss the scale of innovation and extended or inclusive and Lamarckian inheritance. It concludes from these that “new trends in evolutionary biology” are in part a new, and in part an extended evolutionary synthesis.

Keywords

Evolutionary drift Extended evolutionary synthesis Extended inheritance Lamarckian inheritance Lamarckian evolution New evolutionary synthesis 

References

  1. Arthur W (2004) Biased embryos and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin JM (1896) A new factor in evolution. Am Nat 30:441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell G (2009) The oligogenic view of adaptation. Cold Spring Harb Sym 74:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blute M (1979) Sociocultural evolutionism: an untried theory. Beh Sci 24:46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blute M (2008) Is it time for an updated ‘eco-evo-devo’ definition of evolution by natural selection? Spontaneous Gener I:1–5Google Scholar
  6. Blute M (2010) Darwinian sociocultural evolution: solutions to dilemmas in cultural and social theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blute M (2016) Evolution and learning: a response to Watson and Szathmáry. Trends Ecol Evol 31:891–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brakefield PM, Roskam JC (2006) Exploring evolutionary constraints is a task for an integrative biology. Am Nat 168(supplement):S4–S13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Cairns J, Overbaugh J, Miller S (1988) The origin of mutants. Nature 335:142–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caporael LR, Griesemer JR, Wimsatt WC (2014) Developing scaffolds in evolution, culture and cognition. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Chouard T (2010) Revenge of the hopeful monster. Nature 463:864–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark E (2011) Plant individuality and multilevel selection theory. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) The major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 227–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawkins R (1995) River out of Eden: a Darwinian view of life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Gissis SB, Jablonka E (2011) Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths P, Stotz K (2013) Genetics and philosophy: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1995) Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: the Lamarckian dimension. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirschner MW, Gerhart JC (2005) The plausibility of life: resolving Darwin’s dilemma. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  21. Kupiec JJ (2009) The origin of individuals. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Yes, urgently. Nature 514:161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laland K, Uller T, Feldman MW et al (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. P Roy Soc B Biol Sci 282:1019–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Losos JB (2014) The Princeton guide to evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Marouli E et al (2017) Rare and low-frequency coding variants alter human adult height. Nature 542:186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newman SA, Bhat R (2011) Lamarck’s dangerous idea. In: Newman SA, Bhat R (eds) Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Oyama S (2000) The ontogeny of information: developmental systems and evolution, 2nd edn. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  30. Pigliucci M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evol Int J Org Evol 61:2743–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pigliucci M, Müller GB (2010) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Royal Society (2016) New trends in evolutionary biology: biological, philosophical and social science perspectives. http://royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2016/11/evolutionary-biology/
  34. Schwander T, Leimar O (2011) Genes as leaders and followers in evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 26:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waddington C (1953) Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evol Int J Org Evol 7:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner A (2014) Arrival of the fittest: solving evolution’s greatest puzzle. Current, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Wagner A (2017) The white-knight hypothesis, or does the environment limit innovations? Trends Ecol Evol 32:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson RA (2006) Compositional evolution: the impact of sex, symbiosis, and modularity on the gradualist framework of evolution. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson RA, Szathmáry E (2016) How can evolution learn? Trends Ecol Evol 31:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wellenreuther M, Hansson B (2016) Detecting polygenic evolution: problems, pitfalls and promises. Trends Genet 32:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Wray GA, Hoekstra HE, Futuyma DJ et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? No, all is well. Nature 514:161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations