Evolution: Limited and Predictable or Unbounded and Lawless?
In this brief commentary I compare and contrast two different views of evolution: one of limited (convergent) evolution and mathematical predictability, and one of unbounded diversity and no entailing laws. Clearly these opposing views cannot both be true at the same time. Their disagreement seems to rest on different underlying assumptions, and the challenge is to see if they can be reconciled.
KeywordsConvergence Evolution No entailing laws Predictability
- Devaney RL (1986) An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Hordijk W (2013) Correlation analysis of coupled fitness landscapes. In: Engelbrecht A, Richter H (eds) Recent advances in the theory and application of fitness landscapes. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 369–393Google Scholar
- Hordijk W (2014) The algorithmic mind and what it means to solve a problem. Emerg Complex Org 16(4):H1Google Scholar
- Kauffman S (2016a) Beyond pythagoras: no laws entail evolution. Lecture presented at the Konrad Lorenz Institute, Klosterneuburg. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWo7-azGHic
- Kauffman S (2016b) Humanity in a creative universe. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Longo G, Montévil M, Kauffman S (2012) No entailing laws, but enablement in the evolution of the biosphere. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on genetic and evolutionary computation conference companion, ACM, pp 1379–1392Google Scholar
- Odling-Smee FJ, Laland K, Feldman M (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Jersey CityGoogle Scholar
- Turing A (1936) On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. Proc Lond Math Soc Ser 2(42):230–265Google Scholar
- Zia A, Kauffman S, Niiranen S (2012) The prospects and limits of algorithms in simulating creative decision making. Emerg Complex Org 14(3):89–109Google Scholar