Advertisement

Biological Theory

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 73–85 | Cite as

The Evolutionary Significance of the Arts: Exploring the By-product Hypothesis in the Context of Ritual, Precursors, and Cultural Evolution

  • Derek Hodgson
  • Jan Verpooten
Long Article

Abstract

The role of the arts has become crucial to understanding the origins of “modern human behavior,” but continues to be highly controversial as it is not always clear why the arts evolved and persisted. This issue is often addressed by appealing to adaptive biological explanations. However, we will argue that the arts have evolved culturally rather than biologically, exploiting biological adaptations rather than extending them. In order to support this line of inquiry, evidence from a number of disciplines will be presented showing how the relationship between the arts, evolution, and adaptation can be better understood by regarding cultural transmission as an important second inheritance system. This will allow an alternative proposal to be formulated as to the proper place of the arts in human evolution. However, in order for the role of the arts to be fully addressed, the relationship of culture to genes and adaptation will be explored. Based on an assessment of the cognitive, biological, and cultural aspects of the arts, and their close relationship with ritual and associated activities, we will conclude with the null hypothesis that the arts evolved as a necessary but nonfunctional concomitant of other traits that cannot currently be refuted.

Keywords

Adaptation Arts By-product Evolution Ritual 

Notes

Acknowledgments

JV thanks the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) for support (Grant no. G085012N).

References

  1. Aiken N (1999) How art arouses emotion. In: Bedaux B, Cooke B (eds) Sociobiology and the arts. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 159–173Google Scholar
  2. Andrews P, Gangestad S, Matthews D (2002) Adaptationism: how to carry out an exaptationist program. Behav Brain Sci 25:489–553Google Scholar
  3. Arak A, Enquist M (1993) Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Phil Trans R Soc B 340:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arak A, Enquist M (1995) Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form. Phil Trans R Soc B 349:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnqvist G (2006) Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Phil Trans R Soc B 361:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson QD, Whitehouse H (2011) The cultural morphospace of ritual form: examining modes of religiosity cross-culturally. Evol Hum Behav 32:50–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atran S, Henrich J (2010) The evolution of religion: how cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biol Theory 5:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahn PG, Vertut J (1997) Journey through the Ice Age. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd B (2005) Evolutionary theories of art. In: Gottschall J, Wilson DS (eds) The literary animal. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, pp 149–178Google Scholar
  10. Boyd B (2009) On the origin of stories: evolution, cognition, and fiction. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2005) The origin and evolution of cultures. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2007) Cultural adaptation and maladaptation: of kayaks and commissars. In: Gangestad S, Simpson J (eds) The evolution of mind: fundamental questions and controversies. Guilford, New York, pp 327–331Google Scholar
  14. Boyer P, Liénard P (2008) Ritual behavior in obsessive and normal individuals: moderating anxiety and reorganizing the flow of action. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 17:291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown S, Dissanayake E (2009) The arts are more than aesthetics: neuroaesthetics as narrow aesthetics. In: Skov M, Vartanian O (eds) neuroaesthetics. Baywood, Amityville, pp 43–57Google Scholar
  16. Buss DM (2004) Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Carneiro RL (2010) The evolution of the human mind: from supernaturalism to naturalism—an anthropological perspective. Eliot Werner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll J (2008) An evolutionary paradigm for literary study. Style 42:103–425Google Scholar
  19. Changizi M (2011) Harnessed: how language and music mimicked nature and transformed ape to man. Benbella Books, DallasGoogle Scholar
  20. Danto A (2003) The abuse of beauty: aesthetics and the concept of art. Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies S (2012) The artful species: aesthetics, art, and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De La Cruz I, Gonzalez-Oliver A, Brian MK et al (2008) Sex identification of children sacrificed to the ancient Aztec rain gods in Tlatelolco. Curr Anthropol 49:519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Smedt J, De Cruz H (2010) Toward an integrative approach of cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies of art. Evol Psychol 8:695–719Google Scholar
  24. De Smedt J, De Cruz H (2012) Human artistic behavior: adaptation, byproduct, or cultural group selection? In: Plaisance KS, Reydon TAC (eds) Philosophy of behavioral biology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dehaene S, Cohen L (2007) Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56:384–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dehaene S, Naccache L (2001) Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 79:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dissanayake E (1988) What is art for? University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dissanayake E (1995) Homo aestheticus: where art comes from and why. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  29. Dissanayake E (1999) “Making special”: an undescribed human universal and the core of a behavior of art. In: Cooke B, Turner F (eds) Biopoetics. ICUS, Lexington, pp 27–46Google Scholar
  30. Dissanayake E (2008) The arts after Darwin: does art have an origin and adaptive function? In: Zijlmans K, Van Damme W (eds) World art studies: exploring concepts and approaches. Valiz, Amsterdam, pp 241–263Google Scholar
  31. Dissanayake E (2010) The deep structure of Pleistocene rock art: the “artification hypothesis.” Pré-actes du congrès, IFRAO Ariège 2010, Pleistocene art of Europe, Lacombe, Tarascon-sur-Ariège. http://ifrao.sesta.fr/docs/Articles/Dissanayake-Signes.pdf
  32. Dissanayake E (2011) “My glyph is more beautiful than yours”—but does it matter? Rock Art Res 28:168–171Google Scholar
  33. Donald M (1991) Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Dutton D (2009) The art instinct. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Edgerton RB (1992) Sick societies: challenging the myth of primitive harmony. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Eibl K, Mellmann K (2008) Misleading alternatives. Style 42:166–171Google Scholar
  37. Fausto C (2007) Feasting on people: eating animals and humans in Amazonia. Curr Anthropol 48:497–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fiske AP, Haslam N (1997) Is obsessive-compulsive disorder a pathology of the human disposition to perform socially meaningful rituals? Evidence of similar content. J Nerv Ment Dis 185:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Flenley J, Bahn P (2003) The enigmas of Easter Island. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Gamble C (1998) Paleolithic society and the release from proximity: a network approach to intimate relations. World Archaeology 29:426–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghazanfar AA (2008) Language evolution: neural differences that make a difference. Nat Neurosci 11:382–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gill KZ, Purves D (2009) A biological rationale for musical scales. PLoS One 4:e8144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gino F, Norton, MI (2013) Why rituals work. Scientific American. URL: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-rituals-work/
  44. Gombrich EH (1958) The story of art. Phaidon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1997) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc London B 205:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15Google Scholar
  47. Hannon EE, Trainor LJ (2007) Music acquisition: effects of enculturation and formal training on development. Trends Cogn Sci 11:467–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hattori Y, Masaki T, Matsuzawa T (2012) Spontaneous synchronized tapping to an auditory rhythm in a chimpanzee. Sci Rep 3:1566. doi: 10.1038/srep01566 Google Scholar
  49. Hauser MD, McDermott J (2003) The evolution of the music faculty: a comparative perspective. Nat Neurosci 6:663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Helvenston PA, Hodgson D (2010) The neuropsychology of “animism”: implications for understanding rock art. Rock Art Res 27:61–94Google Scholar
  51. Henrich J, McElreath R (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evol Anthropol 12:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Henshilwood CS, Marean CW (2003) The origin of modern human behavior. Curr Anthropol 44:627–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hodder I (2010) Probing religion at Çatalhöyük: an interdisciplinary experiment. In: Hodder I (ed) Religion in the emergence of civilization: Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hodder I (2012) Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Wiley-Blackwell, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hodgson D (2000) Art, perception and information processing:an evolutionary perspective. Rock Art Res 17: 3–34Google Scholar
  56. Hodgson D (2003) The biological foundations of Upper Palaeolithic art: stimulus, percept and representational imperatives. Rock Art Res 20:3–22Google Scholar
  57. Hodgson D (2013) Ambiguity, perception, and the first representations. In: Sachs-Hombach K, Schirra JRJ (eds) Origins of pictures. Papers from the Chemnitz conference, Germany 2010. Halem, Köln, pp 401–423Google Scholar
  58. Hodgson D, Helvenson PA (2006) The emergence of the representation of animals in palaeoart: insights from evolution and the cognitive, limbic and visual systems of the human brain. Rock Art Res 23:3–40Google Scholar
  59. Ingold T (2006) Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos 71:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Johnson MH (2011) Face perception: a developmental perspective. In: Calder A, Rhodes G, Johnson M et al (eds) Oxford handbook of face perception. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  61. Kaas JH (2008) The evolution of the complex sensory and motor systems of the human brain. Brain Res Bull 75:384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Keane W (2010) Marked, absent, habitual: approaches to Neolithic religion at Çatalhöyük. In: Hodder I (ed) Religion in the emergence of civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 187–219Google Scholar
  63. Killin A (2013) The arts and human nature: evolutionary aesthetics and the evolutionary status of art behaviours. Biol Philos 28:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Konopka G, Friedrich T, Davis-Turak J et al (2012) Human-specific transcriptional networks in the brain. Neuron 75:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leslie M (1987) Pretense and representation: the origins of “theory of mind.” Psychol Rev 94:412–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Liénard P, Boyer P (2006) Whence collective rituals? A cultural selection model of ritualized behavior. Am Anthropol 108:814–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Madden JR, Tanner K (2003) Preferences for colored bower decorations can be explained in a nonsexual context. Anim Behav 65:1077–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Malafouris L (2013) How things shape the mind: a theory of material engagement. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Mellmann K (2010) The multifunctionality of idle afternoons. Art and fiction in Boyd’s vision of evolution [review of Boyd 2009]. J Lit Theory online (09.03.2010). URL: http://www.jltonline.de/index.php/reviews/article/view/170/530
  70. Miller GF (1999) Sexual selection for cultural displays. In: Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C (eds) The evolution of culture. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 71–91Google Scholar
  71. Miller GF (2001) Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bull Psychol Arts 2:20–25Google Scholar
  72. Moore JD (2012) Visions of culture: an introduction to anthropological theories and theorists. AltiMira, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  73. Morphy H (1994) The anthropology of art. In: Ingold T (ed) Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Routledge, London, pp 648–685Google Scholar
  74. Morris D (1962) The biology of art. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Pinker S (1997) How the mind works. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Rappaport RA (1999) Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Renfrew C (2008) Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: the factuality of value and of the sacred. Philos Trans R Soc London B 363:2041–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2001) Built for speed, not for comfort: darwinian theory and human culture. Hist Phil Life Sci 23:425–465Google Scholar
  79. Richerson PJ, Boyd R, Henrich J (2010) Gene-culture coevolution in the age of genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8985–8992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 7:157–195Google Scholar
  81. Ryan MJ (1998) Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281:1999–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Saito A, Hayashi M, Takeshita H et al (2010) Drawing behavior of chimpanzees and human children: the origin of representational drawing. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on Kansei, Fukuoka, Japan, 22–23 Feb 2010Google Scholar
  83. Schmidt K (2010) Göbekli Tepe—the Stone Age sanctuaries: new results of ongoing excavations with a special focus on sculptures and high reliefs. Documenta Praehistorica 37:239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Seeberger F (2003) Klangwelten der Altsteinzeit. CD recorded for Urgeschichtliches Museum, BlaubeurenGoogle Scholar
  85. Shennan S (2008) Canoes and cultural evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:3175–3176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Snowdon CT, Teie D (2010) Affective responses in tamarins elicited by species-specific music. Biol Lett 6:30–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sober E (2006) Parsimony. In: Sarkar A, Pfeifer J (eds) The philosophy of science: an encyclopedia. Routledge, New York, pp 531–538Google Scholar
  88. Soffer O, Conkey MW (1997) Studying ancient visual cultures. In: Conkey M, Soffer O, Stratmann D et al (eds) Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  89. Sosis R (2000) Religion and intragroup cooperation: preliminary results of a comparative analysis of utopian communities. Cross-Cult Res 34:70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sperber D, Hirschfeld LA (2004) The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends Cogn Sci 8:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sterelny K (2006) The evolution and evolvability of culture. Mind Lang 21:137–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tanaka M, Tomonaga M, Matsuzawa T (2003) Finger drawing by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 6:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tooby J, Cosmides L (2001) Does beauty build adapted minds? toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. SubStance 30:6–27Google Scholar
  94. VanPool CS, Newsome E (2012) The spirit in the material: a case study of animism in the American Southwest. Am Antiquity 77:243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Verpooten J, Nelissen M (2010) Sensory exploitation and cultural transmission: the late emergence of iconic representations in human evolution. Theor Biosci 129:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weiner J (1994) Aesthetics as a cross-cultural category. Manchester: groups for debates in anthropological theory. Debate held 30th Oct 1993, Muriel Stott Centre, John Rylands University Library of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  97. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  98. Wilson EO (1998) Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Zaidel DW, Nadal M, Flexas A et al (2013) An evolutionary approach to art and aesthetic experience. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 7:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Research Center for Marketing and Consumer Science, Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of LeuvenLeuven LouvainBelgium
  3. 3.Research Group Ethology, Department of BiologyUniversity of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium

Personalised recommendations