Signs and Symbolic Behavior

Abstract

Research in archaeology and anthropology on the evolution of modern patterns of human behavior often makes use of general theories of signs, usually derived from semiotics. Recent work generalizing David Lewis’ 1969 model of signaling provides a better theory of signs than those currently in use. This approach is based on the coevolution of behaviors of sign production and sign interpretation. I discuss these models and then look at applications to human prehistoric behavior, focusing on body ornamentation, tools, and other artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    For reviews, see McBrearty and Brooks (2000) and Henshilwood and Marean (2003).

  2. 2.

    For links to biology and economics, see Skyrms (2010), Zollman et al. (2012), and Wagner (2012); for information theory, Shannon (1948) and Cover and Thomas (2006).

  3. 3.

    For partial common interest, see Crawford and Sobel (1982) and Godfrey-Smith (2013). For cases with signaling despite complete conflict of interest, see Godfrey-Smith and Martinez (in press). Another sense of complete conflict of interest is the sense seen in a “zero-sum game.” Relationships between this sense and the preference-reversal sense are discussed in the Godfrey-Smith and Martinez paper. The cases where information use exists despite complete conflict of interest are not also zero-sum.

    For a model in which sender and receiver conflicts prevent them from settling into a stable pattern, see Wagner (2012).

  4. 4.

    For some other models see Robson (1990) and Farrell and Rabin (1996).

  5. 5.

    “Examples of recognizable external symbolic storage include art work, personal ornamentation, lithic style, and the social use of space” (Henshilwood and Marean 2003, p. 635).

References

  1. Atkin A (2013) Peirce’s theory of signs. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer 2013 edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/. Accessed 8 Aug 2013

  2. Chase PG (1991) Symbols and paleolithic artifacts: style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. J Anthropol Archaeol 10:193–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chase PG, Dibble H (1987) Middle paleolithic symbolism: a review of current evidence and interpretations. J Anthropol Archaeol 6:263–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheney D, Seyfarth RM (2007) Baboon metaphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clottes J, Lewis-Williams D (1998) The Shamans of prehistory: trance and magic in the painted caves. Harry Abrams, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cover TM, Thomas JA (2006) Elements of information theory, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50:1431–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deacon T (1998) The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the human brain. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell J, Rabin M (1996) Cheap talk. J Econ Perspect 10:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Godfrey-Smith P (2013) Information and influence in sender–receiver models, with applications to animal behavior. In: Stegmann U (ed) Animal communication theory: information and influence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 377–396

    Google Scholar 

  11. Godfrey-Smith P, Martinez M (2013) Communication and common interest. PLOS Comput Biol (in press)

  12. Henshilwood CS, Marean CW (2003) The origin of modern human behavior: critique of the models and their test implications. Curr Anthropol 44:627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiscock P (2014) Learning in lithic landscapes: a reconsideration of the hominid ‘tool-using’ niche. Biol Theory 9. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0158-3

  14. Hovers E, Ilani S, Bar-Yosef O, Vandermeersch B (2003) Ochre use by modern humans in Qafzeh Cave. Curr Anthropol 44:491–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hume D (1739) A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. J. Noon, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klein R (2003) Untitled. Comments on Henshilwood and Marean. Curr Anthropol 44:640–641

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krebs J, Dawkins R (1984) Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In: Krebs J, Davies R (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 380–402

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuhn SL (2014) Signaling theory and technologies of communication in the Paleolithic. Biol Theory 9. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0156-5

  19. Leach E (1976) Culture and communication: the logic by which symbols are connected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lévi-Strauss C (1969) In: Weightman J, Weightman D (trans.) The raw and the cooked: mythologies, vol 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  21. Lewis DK (1969) Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  23. McBrearty S, Brooks A (2000) The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behaviour. J Hum Evol 39:453–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Owren M, Rendall D, Ryan M (2010) Redefining animal signaling: influence versus information in communication. Biol Philos 25:755–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peirce CS (1998) In: Peirce Edition Project (ed) The essential Peirce. Vol. 2 (1893–1913): selected philosophical writings. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robb JE (1998) The archeology of symbols. Annu Rev Anthropol 27:329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robson A (1990) Efficiency in evolutionary games: Darwin, Nash, and the secret handshake. J Theor Biol 144:379–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rossano M (2010) Making friends, making tools, and making symbols. Curr Anthropol 51:S89–S98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sackett JR (1982) Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. J Anthropol Archaeol 1:59–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saussure F (1974) In: Harris R (trans) Course in general linguistics. Open Court, La Salle

  31. Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Math J 27:379–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Skyrms B (1996) Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  33. Skyrms B (2010) Signals: evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sterelny K (2012) The evolved apprentice: how evolution made humans unique. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stiner MC (2014) Finding a common band-width: causes of convergence and diversity in Paleolithic beads. Biol Theory 9. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0157-4

  37. Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wagner E (2012) Deterministic chaos and the evolution of meaning. Br J Philos Sci 63:547–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zollman KJ, Bergstrom CT, Huttegger SM (2012) Between cheap and costly signals: the evolution of partially honest communication. Proc R Soc Lond B 20121878. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1878

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all the participants at the 2012 “Symbols, Signals and the Archaeological Record” workshop at the Australian National University, and to the City University of New York for research support. Helpful comments on an earlier draft were provided by Peter Hiscock, Steven Kuhn, Jane Sheldon, Kim Sterelny, and Mary Stiner.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Godfrey-Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfrey-Smith, P. Signs and Symbolic Behavior. Biol Theory 9, 78–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0140-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Archaeology
  • Communication
  • Meaning
  • Prehistory
  • Sender–receiver model
  • Symbols