Biological Theory

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 391–401

Life as a Technological Product: Philosophical and Ethical Aspects of Synthetic Biology

Thematic Issue Article: Synthesis (σύνθεσις)

Abstract

Synthetic biology is a new biotechnology that is developing at an impressive pace and attracting a considerable amount of attention from outside the scientific community as well. In this article, two main philosophically and ethically relevant characteristics of this field of research will be laid bare, namely its reliance on mechanistic metaphors to denominate simple forms of life and its appeal to the semantic field of creativity. It is argued that given these characteristics synthetic biology can be understood as a prime example of a kind of human interference with reality that German philosopher Hannah Arendt called “fabrication.” This kind of self-world-relation contrasts to “action,” a relation that introduces, among other things, the idea of an inherent value of the object acted upon. Taking up this latter perspective, one scientific and two ethical challenges to synthetic biology’s take on the realm of life are identified.

Keywords

Action Arendt Communication Concept of life Creation Engineering Ethics Habermas Synthetic biology Technology 

References

  1. Anders G (1980) Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen, Band II. Über die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt H (1998) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedau MA (2011) The intrinsic scientific value of reprogramming life. Hastings Cent Rep 41:29–31Google Scholar
  4. Benner SA (2003) Synthetic biology: act natural. Nature 6919:118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boldt J, Müller O (2008) Newtons of the leaves of grass. Nat Biotechnol 26:387–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feature News (2009) What’s in a name? Nat Biotech 27:1071–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibson DG, Glass JI, Lartigue C, Noskov VN, Chuang RY, Algire MA et al (2010) Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 5987:52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Habermas J (2003) The future of human nature. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonas H (2001) The phenomenon of human life. Toward a philosophical biology. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  10. Kwok R (2010) Five hard truths for synthetic biology. Nature 7279:288–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morange M (2009) Synthetic biology. A bridge between functional and evolutionary biology. Biological Theory 4:368–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2010) New directions. The ethics of synthetic biology and emerging technologies. http://bioethics.gov/cms/sites/default/files/PCSBI-Synthetic-Biology-Report-12.16.10.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2013
  13. Schmidt M (2009) Do I understand what I can create? Biosafety issues in synthetic biology. In: Schmidt M, Kelle A, Ganguli A, de Vriend H (eds) Synthetic biology. The technoscience and its societal consequences. Springer Academic Publishing, Heidelberg, pp 81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sennett R (2008) The craftsman. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  15. Silver LM (2007) Life 2.0. Newsweek International, June 4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling StudiesUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations