Abstract
What role does non-genetic inheritance play in evolution? In recent work we have independently and collectively argued that the existence and scope of non-genetic inheritance systems, including epigenetic inheritance, niche construction/ecological inheritance, and cultural inheritance—alongside certain other theory revisions—necessitates an extension to the neo-Darwinian Modern Synthesis (MS) in the form of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES). However, this argument has been challenged on the grounds that non-genetic inheritance systems are exclusively proximate mechanisms that serve the ultimate function of calibrating organisms to stochastic environments. In this paper we defend our claims, pointing out that critics of the EES (1) conflate non-genetic inheritance with early 20th-century notions of soft inheritance; (2) misunderstand the nature of the EES in relation to the MS; (3) confuse individual phenotypic plasticity with trans-generational non-genetic inheritance; (4) fail to address the extensive theoretical and empirical literature which shows that non-genetic inheritance can generate novel targets for selection, create new genetic equilibria that would not exist in the absence of non-genetic inheritance, and generate phenotypic variation that is independent of genetic variation; (5) artificially limit ultimate explanations for traits to gene-based selection, which is unsatisfactory for phenotypic traits that originate and spread via non-genetic inheritance systems; and (6) fail to provide an explanation for biological organization. We conclude by noting ways in which we feel that an overly gene-centric theory of evolution is hindering progress in biology and other sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
We note that while D&R attribute the distinction between general and specific evolutionary theories to Webb (2011), it is much older. Lewontin (1970), for example, clearly spelled out the general aspects of Darwinian evolution (variation, inheritance, and differential fitness), and explained how genetic evolution is but one specific theory that fulfills these criteria. It is curious that Webb (2011) cites no references in his paper, neither Lewontin (1970) nor any of the large subsequent literature that has built on Lewontin’s distinction.
Natural selection can also act on cultural or epigenetic variation, such as when differential birth rates affect the spread of different religions (Hout et al. 2001), or epigenetic variants that promote tameness are selected during domestication, as suggested by artificial selection experiments in silver foxes (Jablonka and Raz 2009).
Dickins and Barton (in press) maintain that all such cultural dynamics (such as language change) should be seen as proximate rather than ultimate causes. They equate cultural evolution with “historical accounts,” which “are not in any sense default ultimate accounts,” because (1) historical/cultural dynamics are governed by ultimate genetic causes at some higher level of organization, and (2) there is no adequately worked-out theory of cultural evolution that provides an equivalent level of explanatory power to genetic evolution. We disagree. Regarding point (2), decades of empirical and theoretical work in cultural evolution has identified numerous learning biases that can explain specific behavioral patterns (Mesoudi 2011; Richerson and Boyd 2005), including frequency-dependent (e.g., conformist or anti-conformist) biases and model-based biases such as prestige or success bias. Regarding point (1), as we argued above, the fact that cultural learning biases may have a genetic origin does not imply that the behavior that results from cultural dynamics is under direct genetic control. Hence our claim that these cultural dynamics are often more appropriately seen as ultimate, rather than (or as well as) proximate, causes of behavior.
References
Aoki K, Wakano JY, Feldman MW (2005) The emergence of social learning in a temporally changing environment: a theoretical model. Curr Anthropol 46:334–340
Ben-Ari Y (2008) Neuro-archaeology: pre-symptomatic architecture and signature of neurological disorders. Trends Neurosci 31:626–636
Ben-Ari Y, Spitzer NC (2010) Phenotypic checkpoints regulate neuronal development. Trends Neurosci 33:485–492
Bonduriansky R (2012) Rethinking heredity, again. Trends Ecol Evol 27:330–336
Bonduriansky R, Day T (2009) Non-genetic inheritance and its evolutionary implications. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:103–125
Bouckaert R, Lemey P, Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Alekseyenko AV, Drummond AJ, Gray RD, Suchard MA, Atkinson QD (2012) Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337:957–960
Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Boyd R, Richerson PJ, Henrich J (2011) The cultural niche: why social learning is essential for human adaptation. PNAS 108:10918–10925
Campbell DT (1960) Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol Rev 67:380–400
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1973) Cultural versus biological inheritance: phenotypic transmission from parents to children. Am J Hum Genet 25:618–637
Champagne FA (2008) Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocr 29:386–397
Danchin D, Wagner RH (2010) Inclusive heritability: combining genetic and non-genetic information to study animal behavior and culture. Oikos 119:210–218
Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487–491
Danchin E, Charmantier A, Champagne FA, Mesoudi A, Pujol B, Blanchet S (2011) Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 12:475–486
Dawkins R (2004) Extended phenotype–but not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biol Phil 19:377–396
Day T, Bonduriansky R (2011) A unified approach to the evolutionary consequences of genetic and non-genetic inheritance. Am Nat 178:E18–E36
Dickins TE, Barton RA (2012) Reciprocal causation and the proximate–ultimate distinction. Biol Phil (in press)
Dickins TE, Dickins BJA (2007) Designed calibration: naturally selected flexibility, not non-genetic inheritance. Behav Brain Sci 30:368–369
Dickins TE, Dickins BJA (2008) Mother Nature’s tolerant ways: why non-genetic inheritance has nothing to do with evolution. New Ideas Psychol 26:41–54
Dickins TE, Rahman Q (2012) The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution. Proc R Soc B 279:2913–2921
Furrow RE, Christiansen FB, Feldman MW (2011) Environment-sensitive epigenetics and the heritability of complex diseases. Genetics 189:1377–1387
Galef BG, Laland KN (2005) Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience 55:489–499
Garcia J, Kimeldorf DJ, Koelling RA (1955) Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science 122:157–158
Geoghegan JL, Spencer HG (2012) Population-epigenetic models of selection. Theor Popul Biol 81:232–242
Gerbault P, Liebert A, Itan Y, Powell A, Currat M, Burger J, Swallow DM, Thomas MG (2011) Evolution of lactase persistence: an example of human niche construction. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:863–877
Gray RD, Atkinson QD (2003) Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426:435–439
Haig D (2007) Weismann rules! OK? epigenetics and the lamarckian temptation. Biol Phil 22:415–428
Hout M, Greeley A, Wilde MJ (2001) The demographic imperative in religious change in the United States. Am J Sociol 107:468–500
Huxley JS (1942) Evolution, the modern synthesis. Allen & Unwin, London
Jablonka E (2012) Epigenetic inheritance and plasticity: the responsive germline. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.08.014
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jablonka E, Raz G (2009) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 84:131–176
Kaminsky ZA, Tang T, Wang SC, Ptak C, Oh GHT, Wong AHC, Feldcamp LA, Virtanen C, Halfvarson J, Tysk C (2009) DNA methylation profiles in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Nat Genet 41:240–245
Kendal JR (2012) Cultural niche construction and human learning environments: investigating sociocultural perspectives. Biol Theor 6:241–250
Kirby S, Cornish H, Smith K (2008) Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: an experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. PNAS 105:10681–10686
Labov W (2001) Principles of linguistic change (II): social factors. Blackwell, Malden
Lachmann M, Jablonka E (1996) The inheritance of phenotypes: an adaptation to fluctuating environments. J Theor Biol 181:1–9
Laland KN, Plotkin HC (1990) Social learning and social transmission of foraging information in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Anim Learn Behav 18:246–251
Laland KN, Kumm J, Feldman MW (1995) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Curr Anthropol 36:131–156
Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Myles S (2010) How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nat Rev Genet 11:137–148
Laland KN, Sterelny K, Odling-Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T (2011) Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate–ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science 334:1512–1516
Layton R (2010) Why social scientists don’t like Darwin and what can be done about it. J Evol Psychol 8:139–152
Lefebvre L (1995) The opening of milk bottles by birds: evidence for accelerating learning rates, but against the wave-of-advance model of cultural transmission. Behav Process 34:43–53
Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18
Lorenz K (1969) Innate bases of learning. In: Pribram K (ed) On the biology of learning. Harcourt, New York, pp 13–91
Mameli M (2004) Nongenetic selection and nongenetic inheritance. Brit J Phil Sci 55:35–71
Mayr E, Provine W (eds) (1980) The evolutionary synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Mery F, Varela SAM, Danchin E, Blanchet S, Parejo D, Coolen I, Wagner RH (2009) Public versus personal information for mate copying in an invertebrate. Curr Biol 19:730–734
Mesoudi A (2011) Cultural evolution: how Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Mesoudi A, Laland KN (2007) Culturally transmitted paternity beliefs and the evolution of human mating behaviour. Proc R Soc B 274:1273–1278
Müller GB (2007) Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 8:943–949
Odling Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman M (2003) Niche construction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Pagel M (2009) Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator. Nat Rev Genet 10:405–415
Pigliucci M, Müller GB (2010) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge
Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Schmitz RJ, Schultz MD, Lewsey MG, O’Malley RC, Urich MA, Libiger O, Schork NJ, Ecker JR (2011) Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants. Science 334:369–373
Scott-Phillips TC, Dickins TE, West SA (2011) Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspect Psychol Sci 6:38–47
Shapiro JA (2011) Evolution: a view from the 21st century. FT Press Science, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Whiten A, Goodall J, McGrew WC, Nishida T, Reynolds V, Sugiyama Y, Tutin CEG, Wrangham RW, Boesch C (1999) Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399:682–685
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mesoudi, A., Blanchet, S., Charmantier, A. et al. Is Non-genetic Inheritance Just a Proximate Mechanism? A Corroboration of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. Biol Theory 7, 189–195 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0091-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0091-5
Keywords
- Biological organization
- Cultural evolution
- Epigenetic inheritance
- Extended Evolutionary Synthesis
- Modern Synthesis
- Niche construction
- Non-genetic inheritance